We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Marit R. Westergaard, Definite NP anaphora: a pragmatic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, and Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 1986. Pp. 118.
Review products
Marit R. Westergaard, Definite NP anaphora: a pragmatic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, and Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 1986. Pp. 118.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
28 November 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bolinger, D. (1979). Pronouns in discourse. In Givón, T. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press. 289–309.Google Scholar
Bosch, P. (1983). Agreement and anaphora. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (1986). Anaphoric relations in English and French. London & Canberra: Groom Helm.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English. Travaux linguistiques de Prague2. 339–356.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London & Canberra: Croom Helm.Google Scholar