Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:47:00.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marit R. Westergaard, Definite NP anaphora: a pragmatic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, and Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 1986. Pp. 118.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Christopher Lyons
Christopher Lyons
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , September 1988 , pp. 561 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolinger, D. (1979). Pronouns in discourse. In Givón, T. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press. 289–309.Google Scholar
Bosch, P. (1983). Agreement and anaphora. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (1986). Anaphoric relations in English and French. London & Canberra: Groom Helm.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2. 339–356.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London & Canberra: Croom Helm.Google Scholar