Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T18:05:25.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

M. M. Slaughter, Universal languages and scientific taxonomy in the seventeenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Pp. x+277.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Joseph L. Subbiondo
Joseph L. Subbiondo
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Santa Clara.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 199 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrade, C. N. da C. (1936). The real character of Bishop Wilkins. Annals of Science I, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. (1977). Sensible words: linguistic practice in England 1640–1785. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Knowlson, J. (1975). Universal language schemes in England and France 1600–1800. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purver, M. (1967). The Royal Society: concept and creation. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1979). The study of language in 17th-century England. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Syfert, R. H. (1948). The origins of the Royal Society. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 5, 75–137.Google Scholar