Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:53:28.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

John M. Andersen, The grammar of case: towards a localistic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971. Pp. x + 244.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ronald W. Langacker
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chafe, W. L. (1968). Idiomaticity as an anomaly in the Chomskyan paradigm. FL 4. 109127.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. 188. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1970). Idioms within a transformational grammar. FL 6. 2242.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1969). On derivational constraints. In Binnick, R. I. et al. , (eds.), Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 117139. Chicago: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1970a). Global rules. Lg 46. 627639.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1970b). Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1972). Review of W. L. Chafe, Meaning and the structure of language Lg 48. 134161.Google Scholar
Postal, P. (1970). On the surface verb remind. LIn 1. 37120.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. (1970). Dependency structures and transformational rules. Lg 46. 259285.Google Scholar