Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:24:26.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

James D. McCawley, The syntactic phenomena of English, vols 1 & 2. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1988. Pp. xliv + 768.

Review products

James D. McCawley, The syntactic phenomena of English, vols 1 & 2. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1988. Pp. xliv + 768.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

David Lightfoot
David Lightfoot
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 267 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Binnick, R. I. (1971). Will and be going to. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 40–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. (1978). The verbal complex V'-V in French. LIn 9. 151–175.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. (1977). Towards a theory of tense. LIn 3. 521–557.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Thompson, H. (1975). Introducing cognitive grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 1. 295–313.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. (1981). Restricting the theory of transformations: a case study. In Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D. W. (eds), Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1987). The English verb. 2nd edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1983). Studies in relational grammar. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. & Wilson, D. (1977). Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Lg 53. 741–788.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1976). The syntactic domain of anaphora. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1969). Auxiliaries as main verbs. In Todd, W. (ed.), Studies in Philosophical Linguistics, Series I. Evanston: Great Expectations.Google Scholar
Weinberg, A. S. (in press). Markedness vs. maturation: the case of Subject Auxiliary Inversion. Language Acquisition 1. 2.Google Scholar