We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
A. J. Aitken & T. McArthur (eds), Languages of Scotland. (The Association for Scottish Literary Studies Occasional Paper No. 4.) Edinburgh: W. & R. Chambers, 1979. Pp. 160.
Review products
A. J. Aitken & T. McArthur (eds), Languages of Scotland. (The Association for Scottish Literary Studies Occasional Paper No. 4.) Edinburgh: W. & R. Chambers, 1979. Pp. 160.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
28 November 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Fishman, J. (1972). Varieties of ethnicity and varieties of language consciousness. In Dil, A. (ed), Language in sociocullural change. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 179–191.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1977). The spread of English as a new perspective for the study of language maintenance and language shift. In Fishman, J., Cooper, R. & Conrad, A.The spread of English. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publishers. 108–137.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966a). Dialect, language, nation. AmA68. 922–935.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966b). Language conflict and language planning. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kremnitz, G. (1975). Die ethnischen Minderheiten Frankreichs. Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik. Tübingen.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. (1971). Successes and failures in the movement for the restoration of Irish. In Rubin, J. & Jernudd, B. (eds), Can language be planned?Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 65–95.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1980). The relative clause marker in Scots English: Diffusion, complexity and style as dimensions of syntactic change. Language in society9, 221–247.Google Scholar