Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:25:29.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heinz J. Giegerich, Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Pp. vii + 301.

Review products

Heinz J. Giegerich, Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Pp. vii + 301.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Bruce Hayes
Bruce Hayes
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 229 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abercrombie, D. (1965). Syllable quantity and enclitics in English. In Abercrombie, D. et al. (eds.), In honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longmans, Green. 216–222.Google Scholar
Benware, W. (1980). Zum Fremdwortakzent im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 47. 298–312.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, B. (1978). A study in comparative prosody: German and English iambic pentameter. Stuttgart: Akademischer Verlag Hans-Dieter Heinz.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1972). Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In Peters (1972), 63–130.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (forthcoming). Grids and trees. To appear in the proceedings of the 1984 Phonologietagung, Eisenstadt, Austria.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1984). Constraining metrical theory: a modular theory of rhythm and distressing. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Forthcoming from Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. LIn 13. 227–276.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1973). Phonological representations. In Fujimura, O. (ed.), Three dimensions in linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1977). The rhythmic structure of English verse. LIn 8. 189–247.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. LIn 10. 421–441.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part I). Dordrecht: Foris. 131–175.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1973). The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. JAcS 51. 2018–2024.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LIn 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Peters, S. (1972). Goals of linguistic theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Postal, P. (1972). The best theory. In Peters (1972), 131–170.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1983). Relating to the grid. LIn 14. 19–100.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. (1970). Der Fremdwortakzent im Deutschen. Linguistics 56. 87–108.Google Scholar