Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:15:01.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hagit Borer, Structuring sense, vol. III: Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xxvi + 671.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2014

Marijke De Belder*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven campus Brussels/CRISSP/FWO
*
Author's address: Warmoesberg 26, 1000 Brussels, Belgium[email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2009. On the role of syntactic locality in morphological processes: The case of Greek derived nominals. In Giannakidou, Anastasia & Rathert, Monika (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 253280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1982. Where's morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13, 571621.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya. 2003. Roots and patterns: Hebrew morphosyntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark, Johnson, Kyle & Roberts, Ian. 1999. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 373416.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1981. The Indo-European lexicon. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme based morphology. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005a. Structuring sense, vol I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005b. Structuring sense, vol II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick & Rosenbaum, Peter (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
De Belder, Marijke & van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. To appear. How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. To appear. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Word-formation and the lexicon. In Ingemann, Frances (ed.), Proceedings of the Mid-America Linguistics Conference, 332. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2001. Phases and words. Ms., New York University.Google Scholar
Sichel, Ivy. 2010. Even structure constraints in nominalization. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Rathert, Monika (eds.), The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks (Interface Explorations 23), 159198. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Hout, Angeliek & Roeper, Thomas. 1998. Events and aspectual structure in derivational morphology. In Harley, Heidi (ed.), UPenn/MIT Roundtable on the Lexicon (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35), 185211. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar