Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:29:21.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hagit Borer (ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics. (Syntax & Semantics, 19.) New York: Academic Press, 1986. Pp. xii + 380.

Review products

Hagit Borer (ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics. (Syntax & Semantics, 19.) New York: Academic Press, 1986. Pp. xii + 380.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Haiman
John Haiman
Affiliation:
Linguistics Program, Macalester College, St Paul, Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 250 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1975). Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Lg 51. 406–418.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (1983). Hierarchies, targets, and controllers: agreement patterns in Slavic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. (1986). Primary objects, secondary objects, and anti-dative. Lg 62. 808–845.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1985). Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Haiman, J. (ed.) Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 187–220.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1974). Targets and syntactic change. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1977). Reinterpretation. Lg 53. 312–328.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Lg 59. 781–819.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (1975). Some functional relationships in grammar. Lg 51. 89–104.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1957). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Department of Slavic Languages, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1975). French syntax: the transformational cycle. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. & Munro, P. (1975). Passives and their meaning. Lg 51. 789–830.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. (1932). Icon, index, and symbol. In Hartshorne, C. & Weiss, P. (eds), Collected writings, Vol. 2, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Postal, P. (1970). Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Spiess, F. (1956). Die Verwendung des Subjekt-personalpronomens in den lombardischen Mundarten. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, J. (1892). Über ein Gesetz der Indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen 4. 336–433.Google Scholar