Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:26:12.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fusion of functions: The syntax of once, twice and thrice1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2007

JOHN PAYNE ,
RODNEY HUDDLESTON  and
GEOFFREY K. PULLUM
JOHN PAYNE*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
RODNEY HUDDLESTON*
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
GEOFFREY K. PULLUM*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
Authors' addresses: Linguistics and English Language, School of Languages, Linguistics and Cultures, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]
School of English, Media Studies and Art History, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Qld 4072Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Linguistics and English Language, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 14 Buccleuch Place, EdinburghEH8 9LN, Scotland, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we present a detailed new analysis of the English expressions once, twice and thrice. These, we claim, are primarily compound determinatives, analogous in many respects to expressions like someone and somewhere. The new analysis exploits the framework of the Cambridge grammar of the English language (2002) in which the morphological nature of the compound determinative category reflects a fusion of functions, typically determiner (or modifier) and head of NP. We refine the notion of fusion of functions, and show that constructions which employ fusion of functions have properties which clearly distinguish them from superficially similar constructions which employ incorporation or hybridization. The paper therefore provides further evidence for the existence of fusion of functions as a distinct syntactic configuration, and indirectly supports theoretical frameworks which treat functions and categories as distinct primitives.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , November 2007 , pp. 565 - 603
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aarts, Bas & Liliane, Haegeman. 2006. English word classes and phrases. In Bas, Aarts & April, McMahon (eds.) Handbook of English linguistics, 117–145. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2005. Remarks on gerunds. In Orgun, C. & Sells, Peter (eds.) Morphology and the web of grammar: Essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe, 25–47. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Brame, Michael. 1982. The head-selector theory of lexical specifications and the non-existence of coarse categories. Linguistic Analysis 10, 321–325.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1997. Mixed categories as head sharing constructions. In Miriam, Butt & Tracy, King (eds.) Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference, University of California, San Diego. http://www-csli.stanford.edu/publications/LFG2/lfg97.html (20 May 2007).Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Grimshaw, Jane. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9 (3), 331–391.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving and local transformations. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Groos, Anneke & van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1981. The matching effects in free relatives: A parameter of core grammar. In Adriana, Belletti, Brandi, Luciana & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.) Theory of markedness in generative grammar. Pisa: Scuola Normal Superiore.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander. 1994. Three studies in locality and case. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander. 1996. The proper analysis of ‘missing-P’ free relative constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 257–293.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander. 2003. A unified theory of ‘standard’ and ‘transparent’ free relatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 247–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbert, Wayne. 1983. On the nature of the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review 2, 237–284.Google Scholar
Hirschbühler, Paul & Rivero, Maria-Luisa. 1983. Remarks on free relatives and matching phenomena. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 505–519.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, K. Geoffrey. 2005. A student's introduction to English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, K. Geoffrey et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2003. Gerunds without phrase structure. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 579–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924 The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Hideki. 2000. Indefinite pronouns and overt N-raising. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Sige Yuki. 1968. English relativization and certain related problems. Language 44, 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1987. ‘Missing prepositions’ and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 239–266.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. & Marušič, Franc. 2004. On indefinite pronoun structures with APs: Reply to Kishimoto. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 268–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2004. Something invisible in English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL) 11(1): Penn Linguistics Colloquium 28, 143–155.Google Scholar
Malouf, Robert P. 2000. Mixed categories in the hierarchical lexicon. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Huddleston, & Pullum, et al. , 326–523.Google Scholar
Proctor, Paul (ed.-in-chief). 1995. Cambridge international dictionary of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1991. English nominal gerund phrases as noun phrases with verb phrase heads. Linguistics 29, 763–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk C. van. 1998. Head movement and adjacency. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16, 633–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooryck, Johan. 1994. Generalized transformations and the Wh-cycle: Free relatives and bare Wh-CPs. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 37, 195–208.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sara T. 1989. Two types of noun incorporation: A lexical analysis. Language 65, 294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Arnold, Doug J.. 1994. Prenominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinction. Journal of Linguistics 30, 187–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1975. The single mother condition. Journal of Linguistics 11, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John (ed.-in-chief). 1987. Collins COBUILD English language dictionary. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1995. Incorporation in Chukchi. Language 71, 439–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Ralf. 2001. Towards an optimal typology of the free relative construction. In Alexander, Grosu (ed.) IATL8: The 16th Annual Conference and the Research Workshop of the Israel Science Foundation ‘The syntax and semantics of relative clause constructions’ Tel Aviv University 2000. 107–119. Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics.Google Scholar
Vogel, Ralf. 2002. Free relative constructions in OT syntax. In Gisbert, Fanselow & Caroline, Féry (eds.) Resolving conflicts in grammars: Optimality Theory in syntax, morphology, and phonology (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 11), 119–162. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar