Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:13:57.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Erica C. García, The role of theory in linguistic analysis: the Spanish pronoun system. (North-Holland Linguistic Series, 19.) Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1975. Pp. xxii+522.

Review products

Erica C. García, The role of theory in linguistic analysis: the Spanish pronoun system. (North-Holland Linguistic Series, 19.) Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1975. Pp. xxii+522.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John N. Green
Affiliation:
Department of Language, University of York.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beukenkamp, M. S. (1974). Where does impersonal se come from? In Campbell, R. J. et al. (eds), Linguistic studies in Romance languages. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Contreras, L. (1966). Significado y funciones del se. ZRPh 82. 298307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals of linguistic theory. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Green, J. N. (1975). Reflections on Spanish reflexives. Lingua 35. 345391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. N. (MS) Voice relations in Spanish syntax.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. Jr (1968). An essay on language. Philadelphia: Chilton.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1955). Économie des changements phonétiques. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Peters, P. S. & Ritchie, R. W. (1969). A note on the universal base hypothesis. JL 5. 150152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, I. (1975). The New Grammarians' funeral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, E. M. (1973). Critical comments on transformational-generative grammar 1962–1972. The Hague: Smits.Google Scholar