Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:14:58.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

-Ed Adjectives like ‘verandahed’ and ‘blue-eyed’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

W. H. Hirtle
W. H. Hirtle
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Université Laval
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem that provides the subject of the present study has, curiously enough, received little more than a passing glance from most grammarians. Many of them mention that adjectives can be formed from substantives by means of a dental suffix, but none seem to be intrigued by the four aspects of the problem to be examined here. The fact that these aspects of the problem have received little or no attention up to now would in itself justify this study. There is, however, a further and even weightier justification. The problem brings into focus four parts of speech-verb (through the past participle), substantive, adjective and adverb–and so provides an excellent opportunity for observing the relations between these categories. Such a chance should not be missed, especially at a time when not merely the system but the very existence of the parts of speech is being called into question.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 19 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alford, H. (1881). A Plea for the Queen's English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bosworth, J. & Toller, T. N. (1954). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
De Saussure, F. (1955) Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1958). Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. (1960). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
Hirtle, W. H. (1967). The Simple and Progressive Forms (Cahiers de Psychomécanique du langage, No. 8). Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1954). A Modern English Grammar, Parts II and VI. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Nesfield, J. C. (1956). English Grammar Past and Present. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Onions, C. T., Friedrichsen, G. W. S. & Burchfield, R. W. (1966). The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1963). Origins, 3rd ed.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pence, R. W. and Emery, D. W. (1964). A Grammar of Present-Day English. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Poutsma, H. (1926). A Grammar of Late Modern English, Part II, Section II. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1955). New English Grammar. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
Tatlock, S. P. & Kennedy, A. G. (1963). A Concordance to the Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Valin, R. (forthcoming). Le linguiste devant le problème de l'observation (Cahiers de Psychomécanique du langage, No. 7). Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Valin, R. (1955). Petite introduction à la Psychomécanique du langage (Cahiers de Psychomécanique du langage, No. 3). Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar