Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:41:28.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Duke of York gambit1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Geoffrey K. Pullum
Geoffrey K. Pullum
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A Duke who has not been satisfactorily identified with any historical figure is lampooned in a traditional rhyme (believed to have been directed originally at the King of France) as follows:

The Grand Old Duke of York

He had ten thousand men

He marched them up a great high hill

And he marched them down again.

The implication is that this was incompetent and self-defeating activity on his part. Linguists very frequently seem to give evidence of a tacitly held belief that there is similarly something inept and risible about a linguistic analysis which determines that certain structures are assigned a derivation of the general form A→B→A, that is a derivation in which an underlying representation (or some nonultimate remote representation) is mapped on to an intermediate form distinct from it, and then on to a surface (or other superficial) representation which is identical with the earlier stage.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 83 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R. (1974). On dis-agreement rules. Lin 5. 445–451.Google Scholar
Berman, A. (1974). On the VSO hypothesis. Lin 5. 1–38.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. & Heidoiph, K. E. (eds.) (1970). Progress in linguistics: a collection of papers. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brame, M. K. & Bordelois, I. (1973). Vocalic alternations in Spanish. LIn, 4. 111–168.Google Scholar
Brame, M. K. & Bordelois, I. (1974). Some controversial questions in Spanish phonology. LIn 5. 282–298.Google Scholar
Brasington, R. W. P. (1971). Noun pluralization in Brazilian Portuguese. JL 7. 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. (1974). On characterizing the natural order of application of phonological rules. Lingua 34. 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. (1973). Extrinsic order lives. Duplicated, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1974). The fallacy of strict sequentiality. Duplicated, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Grosu, A. (1974). On the nature of the Left Branch Condition. LIn 5. 308–319.Google Scholar
Hale, K. (1975) Counterexamples and explanations in Navajo linguistics: syntax. Navajo Language Review (Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics) 2. 29–60.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1969). Spanish phonology. Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. (1973). Determiner and number systems in contemporary English. Preliminary version. Duplicated, University of Amsterdam and University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Howard, I. (1973). A directional theory of rule application. MIT Ph.D. dissertation. Duplicated, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Howard, I. (1975). Can the ‘Elsewhere Condition’ get anywhere? Lg 51. 109–127.Google Scholar
Hubers, G. A. C. & Kooij, J. G. (1973). Voice assimilation in Dutch. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 14. 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (1971). The state of phonology. Linguistics 71. 5–45.Google Scholar
Jacobson, P. & Neubauer, P. (1974). Extraposition rules and the cycle. Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics 1. VIII/I–VIII/99.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (1973). Linking and intrusive /r/ in English: a case for a more concrete phonology. SL 27. 53–68.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (1974). Towarda theory of relationally based grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1972). Semantically based grammar. LIn 3. 413–461.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1974). A universal definition of ‘subject of’. Mimeographed, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). How abstract is phonology? Duplicated, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1971). Historical linguistics. In Dingwall, W. O. (ed), A survey of linguistic science. College Park, Md.: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1973). ‘Elswhere’ in phonology. In Anderson, S. R. & Kiparsky, P. (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In Bierwisch, M. & Heidolph, K. E. (eds.), Progress in linguistics: a collection of papers. 143–173.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G. A. & Noll, C. (1974). On the application of phonological rules. Lg 50. 1–28.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1971). Position of locatives in existential sentences. LIn 3. 333–378.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1960). The grammar of English nominalizations. (= IJAL 26, 3, Part 2.) Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, Publication 12.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1970). English as a VSO language. Lg 46. 286–299.Google Scholar
Mey, J. (1968). A case of assimilation in Modern Dutch. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 11. 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mey, J. (1973). Dutch treat: a reply. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 14. 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, S. (1974). Nasality in modern Portuguese. Diploma dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Perimutter, D. M. (1970). The article in English. In Bierwisch, M. & Heidoiph, K. E. (eds.), Progress in linguistics: a collection of papers. 233–248.Google Scholar
Perimutter, D. M. (1972). Evidence for shadow pronouns from French relativization. In Peranteau, P.et al. (eds.), The Chicago which hunt. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 73–105.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1974). On raising. Cambridge, Mass, & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1974). Sheltering environments and negative contexts: a case against making phonological rules state things that don't happen. Edinburgh Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 31–41.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (forthcoming). Sequential and simultaneous rule application in Spanish phonology. To appear in Lingua.Google Scholar
Ringen, C. (1973). Vacuous application, iterative application, reapplication, and the unordered rules hypothesis. Duplicated, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1966). Relativization in extraposed clauses (a problem which evidence is presented that help is needed to solve). Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation. Report No. NSF-17 to the National Science Foundation. Computational Laboratory, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Schmerling, S. (1973). Subjectless sentences and the notion of surface structure. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. 577–586.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, R. B. D. (1973). Klamath phonology. Studies in Linguistics and Language Learning 12. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. (1970). The free ride principle and two rules of complete assimilation in English. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 579–588.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. (1973). Homing in: on arguing for remote representations. JL 10. 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. (1974). Taking a false step. Lg 50. 215–224.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. & Zwicky, A. D. (1973). How come and what for. In Kachru, B.et al. (eds.), Issues in linguistics. Urbana, Chicago and London: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar