We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Ard, W. J. (1977). Raising and word order in diachronic syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, (1975). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Clark, R. & Roberts, I. (1993). A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry24. 299–345.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. (in press). New directions in English historical grammar. To appear in Neophilologus78.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. & Leek, F. C. van der (1983). The demise of the Old English impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistics19. 337–368.Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. van (1992). Structural factors in the history of English modals. In Rissanen, M. et al. (eds.) History of Englishes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 287–309.Google Scholar
Koopman, W. F. (1992). The distribution of verb forms in Old English subordinate clauses. In Rissanen, M. et al. (eds.) History of Englishes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (1991). How to set parameters. Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R. (1968). Untersuchungen zum Frühmittelenglischen Tempussystem. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar