Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:52:09.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The concept of rank in ‘Neo-Firthian’ grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

P. H. Matthews
P. H. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1966 , pp. 101 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bos, B. (1962). The co-ordinative construction in modern Dutch. Lingua 11. 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1963 a). A logical statement of grammatical theory. Lg. 39. 654–68.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1963 b). Linguistic Science and Logic (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 28.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. (Special Volume of the Philological Society.) Oxford: Blackwell. 1–32.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. (1946). A note on bound forms. JEGP 45. 406.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1956). Grammatical categories in modern Chinese. TPHS 177–224.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1957). Some aspects of systematic description and comparison in grammatical analysis. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. 54–67.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1959). The Language of the Chinese ‘Secret History of the Mongols’. (Publications of the Philological Society, 17.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. 241–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1963). Class in relation to the axes of chain and choice in language. Linguistics 2. 5–15.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P. D. (1964). The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. D. (1965). Rank and depth. Lg. 41.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1962). On the mechanization of syntactic analysis. 1961 International Conference on Machine Translation of Languages and Applied Analysis, vol.2. London: H.M.S.O. 673–84.Google Scholar
Longacre, R. E. (1965). Some fundamental insights of tagmemics. Lg. 41. 65–76.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1962). Dimensions of grammatical constructions. Lg. 38. 221–44.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1959). In defence of WP. TPhS 116–44.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1964). General Linguistics: An Introductory Survey. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Togeby, K. (1949). Qu'est-ce qu'un mot? Recherches structurales. (TCLC. 5.) Copenhague: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag. 97–111.Google Scholar