Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:18:06.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Child phonology: a prosodic view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Natalie Waterson
Natalie Waterson
Affiliation:
Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the past few years linguists have begun to express doubts about the validity of segmental analysis for the study of child language and have come to feel that it is probable that a child perceives spoken language differently from an adult, e.g. Bellugi & Brown (1964: 113), Ingram (1966: 218), Ladefoged (1967: 148–9), Lenneberg (1967: 279–281), Weir (1962: 30). They are also beginning to realize the importance of treating a child's language as having its own independent system (Carroll, 1961: 332; Fry, 1966: 194). To date, however, investigators of child speech have made their analyses on a segmental and distributional basis and have expressed the child's phonological system in terms of the adult's phonemic system; one may cite for example Cohen (1969), Grégoire (1933, 1947), Jakobson (1941), Jakobson & Halle (1961), Leopold (1939, 1947, 1961), Lewis (1968), Ohnesorg (1959), Velten (1943) and Weir (1962). Such studies, valuable though they be, cannot be said to have succeeded in explaining the relationship between the forms and structures of child and adult and have left many questions unanswered such as: (1) What governs the choice of sound that the child will use as a ‘substitute’ for an adult sound? (2) Why does the child ‘drop’ certain sounds of the adult form or ‘substitute’ for them when he is already capable of making such sounds and is in factusing them in some other contexts? (3) Why does the child use homonyms for adult forms which appear to be quite unlike each other and which have been proved to be semantically clearly differentiated for the child? (4) What governs the form that reduplicated words take?

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , September 1971 , pp. 179 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (1964). The acquisition of language. (Monograph of the society for research in child development, serial no. 92. 29. 1.) Lafayette, Ind.: Child development publications.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological review 65. 14–21. Reprinted in Oldfield & Marshall (eds.) (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1961). Language development in children. In Saporta (ed.) (1961).Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Masa.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1966). Current ittues in linguistic theory, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1967). The formal nature of language. In Lenneberg (1967). 397–442.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. (1969). Sur l'étude du langage enfantin. Enfance 3–4. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J., (eds.) (1965). The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production. JVLVB 2. 121–135. Reprinted in Oldfield & Marshall (eds.) (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, C. B. (1966). The development of the phonological system in the normal and the deaf child. In Smith & Miller (eds.) (1966). 187–206.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1964). An introduction to the pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Grégoire, A. (1933). L'apprentissage de la parole pendant les deux premières années de l'enfance. Psychologie du langage, Ch. 5. Paris.Google Scholar
Grégoire, A. (1947). L'apprentissage du langage. Vol. 2. Faculté de philosophie et lettres. Liège. Fascicule CVI. Librairie E. Droz, Paris 25, rue de Tournon.Google Scholar
Ingram, T. T. S. (1966). Syntactic regularities. General discussion. In Lyons & Wales (eds.) (1966). 214–219.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. Transl. Keiler, A. R. (1968). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & Halle, M. (1961). Phonemic patterning. In Saporta (ed.) (1961).Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1962). An outline of English phonetics. 9th edition. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1966). The philosophy of language. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three areas of experimental phonetics. London: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1965). The capacity for language acquisition. In Fodor & Katz (eds.) (1965). 579–603.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1966a). A biological perspective of language. In Lenneberg, E. H. (ed.), New directions in the study of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Paperback ed.). 65–88.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1966b). The natural history of language. In Smith & Miller (eds.) (1966). 219–252.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York, London, Sydney: J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (1939). Speech development of a bilingual child. Vol. 1 (1954 reprint). Evanston: North Western University Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (1947). Speech development of a bilingual child. Vol. 2. Evanston: North Western University Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (1961). Patterning in children's language learning. In Saporta (ed.), (1961). 350–358.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. M. (1968 edition). Infant speech. A study in the beginnings of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds.) (1966). Psycholinguistics papers. (Proceedings of the Edinburgh Conference 1966.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1966). The creation of language by children. In Lyons & Wales (eds.) (1966). 99–132.Google Scholar
Ohnesorg, E. (1959). Druhá fonetická Studie o dětiké řeči. Brno: spisy university v Brně filosofická fakulta. 57.Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C. & Marshall, J. C. (eds.) (1968). Language. (Penguin Modern Psychology) Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1967). (Reprint) The language and thought of the child. Transl. , M. and Gabain, R.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
Saporta, Sol (ed.). (1961). Ptycholinguistics: a book of readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds.) (1966). The genesis of language. A psycholinguistic approach. Cambridge, Mass, and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Velten, H. V. (1943). The growth of phonemic and lexical patterns in infant language. Lg 19. 281–292.Google Scholar
Waterson, N. (1970). Some speech forms of an English child: a phonological study. TPS forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, R. H. (1962). Language in the crib. (Janua Linguarum. Series maior, XIV.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar