We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. 1998. Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation. Language74, 695–727.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Stony Brook, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1999. Transpositions and argument structure. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1998, 73–101. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Alessandro. 1993. The language of propositions and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar