Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:08:11.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Andreas Koutsoudas (ed.), The application and ordering of grammatical rules. The Hague: Mouton, 1976. Pp. viii + 360.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Geoffrey K. Pullum
Geoffrey K. Pullum
Affiliation:
Department of Phonetics and LingusiticsUniversity College London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 179 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brame, M. K. (1978). The base hypothesis and the spelling prohibition. Linguistic Analysis 4. 1–30.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. W. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. W. & Miller, G. (eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cathey, J. E. & Demers, R. A. (1976). On establishing linguistic universals. Lg 52. 611–630.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1967). Some general properties of phonological rules. Lg 43. 102–128.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1965). Some controversial questions in phonological theory. JL 1. 97–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H. (1977). Filters and control. LIn, 8. 425–504.Google Scholar
Fiengo, R. W. (1977). On trace theory. LIn 8. 35–61.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harms, R. T. (1968). Introduction to phonological theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hou, J. Y. (1975). Isn't rule ordering necessary in phonology? In Grossman, R. E., San, L. J. & Vance, T. J. (eds), CLS 11. 295–301.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1976). Arguments for a nontransformational grammar. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, P.Neubauer, P. (1976). Rule cyclicity: evidence from the Intervention Constraint. LIn 7. 449–461.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E. & Postal, P. M. (1979) Arc-pair Grammar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J. (1976). The cycle against free rule application. In Hankamer, J. & Aissen, J. (eds), Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 2. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University. 359–444.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (1971). On the non-sufficiency of extrinsic order. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (1972a). The strict order fallacy. Lg 48. 88–96.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (1972b). Is extrinsic order necessary? Paper presented at the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists. In Heilmann, L. (ed.), Proceedings of the IIth International Congress of Linguists. Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino. 1974. 971–978.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G. A. & Noll, C. (1974). On the application of phonological rules. Lg 50, 1–28. Duplicated version, 1971; Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1969). On derivational constraints. In Binnick, R. I., Davison, A., Green, G. M. & Morgan, J. L. (eds), CLS 5. 117–139.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1977). Linguistic gestalts. In Beach, W. A., Fox, S. E. & Philosoph, S. (eds), CLS 13. 236–287.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Ross, J. R. (1968). Ordering of transformational rules. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). Review of Dressier, W. U. & Mareš, F. V. (eds), Phonologica 1972: Akten der zweiten internationalen Phonologie-Tagung, Wien, 5–8 September 1972. JL 12. 346–358.Google Scholar
Levine, A. (1976). Why argue about rule ordering? Linguistic Analysis 2. 115–124.Google Scholar
Morin, J.-Y. (1973). Rule ordering and the cyclic principle. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. & Postal, P. M. (1977). Toward a universal characterization of passivization. In Whistler, K. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 394–417.Google Scholar
Peters, S. & Ritchie, R. W. (1973). On the generative power of transformational grammars. Information Sciences 6. 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, G. L. (1975). More on the application of phonological rules. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics 5. 113–150.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1968). Aspects of phonological theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1976). Rule interaction and the organization of a grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of London. (To be published by Gorland, New York, 1979.)Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. (Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.) Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1968.Google Scholar
Sanders, G. A. (1974). On the notions ‘optional’ and ‘obligatory’ in linguistics. Minnesota Working Papers in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language 2. 145–187.Google Scholar
Trommelen, M. & Zonneveld, W. (1978). Where the principles fail. A review of Koutsoudas, A. (ed.), The application and ordering of grammatical rules. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Wasow, T. (1975). Anaphoric pronouns and bound variables. Lg 51. 368–383.Google Scholar