Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:05:35.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working the Early Shift: Older Inland Northern Speech and the Beginnings of the Northern Cities Shift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2016

Matthew J. Gordon  and
Christopher Strelluf
Matthew J. Gordon*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, 114 Tate Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-1500, 573-882-6421
Christopher Strelluf
Affiliation:
Northwest Missouri State University, 2920 Colden Hall, Maryville, MO 64468-6015, 660-562-1997
*
*Address for correspondence: English Department, 114 Tate Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The complex series of vowel changes known as the Northern Cities Shift has been extensively documented over the last four decades across the broad territory of the Inland North dialect region. Little is known, however, about the origins of the shift, and there remain open questions about where the changes began and which vowel initiated the process. This paper examines such questions by analyzing the speech of several people born in the late 19th and early 20th centuries using archival recordings of oral history interviews. Drawing on acoustic data we identify what appear to be early stages of the Northern Cities Shift in some individual speakers though many in the sample give no evidence of participating in the changes. We consider the implications of these findings for accounts of how the shift began with particular focus on Labov’s (2010) proposal.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistic Geography , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 31 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adank, Patti, Smits, Roel & van Hout, Roeland. 2004. A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(5). 3099-3107.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steven. 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-6. https://github.com/lme4/lme4/ (18 February, 2014)Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. 2001. The phonological status of western New England. American Speech 76(1). 3-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K. & Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Decker, Paul & Nycz, Jennifer. 2013. The technology of conducting sociolinguistic interviews. In Christine Mallison, Becky Childs & Gerard van Herk (eds.), Data collection in sociolinguistics, 118-126, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dinkin, Aaron J. 2012. Toward a unified theory of chain shifting. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 748-760. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Driscoll, Anna & Lape, Emma. 2015. Reversal of the Northern Cities Shift in Syracuse, New York. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2). 41-47.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Evanini, Keelan. 2009. The permeability of dialect boundaries: A case study of the region surrounding Erie, Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lauren. 2014. The St. Louis corridor: Mixing, competing, and retreating dialects. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Joseph. 2013. The phonological influence on phonetic change. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Gibson, Campbell. 1998. Population of the 100 largest cities and other urban places in the United States: 1790–1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division Working Paper No. 27. URL: https://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/ twps0027/twps0027.html (8 October 2016)Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. 2001. Small-Town values and big-city vowels: A study of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan, vol. 84, Publication of the American Dialect Society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. 2012. English in the United States. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, 109-132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. 2013. Investigating chain shifts and mergers. In J.K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn., 202-219. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. & Strelluf, Christopher. Forthcoming. Evidence of American regional dialects in early recordings. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Listening to the past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathon, Palethorpe, Sallyanne & Watson, Catherine. 2000. Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: An acoustic analysis of the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30(1/2). 63-78.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. forthcoming. Listening to the past: Audio records of accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika. 1999. Diffusion of urban sound change in rural Michigan: A case of the Northern Cities Shift. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann. 2000. Creating a New Town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29(1). 65-115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1949. A word geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans & McDavid, Raven I. Jr. 1961. The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1, Internal factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 3, Cognitive and cultural factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Rosenfelder, Ingrid & Fruehwald, Joseph. 2013. One hundred years of sound change in English in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89(1). 30-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah & Steiner, Richard. 1972. A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. & Sloetjes, H.. 2009. Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 41(3). 841-849, doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.591.Google Scholar
Lenzo, Kevin. 2010. CMU pronouncing dictionary. http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/cgi-bin/cmudict (17 September 2013).Google Scholar
Lobanov, B.M. 1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49(2B). 606-608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max Planck Institute. 2012. ELAN [Computer program]. Version 4.1.0, retrieved July 2012 from http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/ Google Scholar
McCarthy, Corrine. 2009. The Northern Cities Shift in real time: Evidence from Chicago. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2). 101-110.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Corrine. 2011. The Northern Cities Shift in Chicago. Journal of English Linguistics 39(2). 166-187.Google Scholar
Nearey, Terence. 1977. Phonetic feature system for vowels. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Joe, Evanini, Keelan & Yuan, Jiahong. 2011. FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction) Program Suite. http://fave.ling.upenn.edu (17 September 2013).Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Blondeau, Hélène. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3). 560-588.Google Scholar
Strelluf, Christopher. 2014. “We have such a normal, non-accented voice”: A sociophonetic study of English in Kansas City. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Thomas, Charles K. 1958. An introduction to the phonetics of American English, 2nd edn. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2010. A longitudinal analysis of the durability of the Northern-Midland dialect boundary in Ohio. American Speech 85(4). 375-430.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2011. Sociophonetics: An introduction. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R & Kendall, Tyler. 2015. NORM’s vowel normalization methods. NORM: The Vowel Normalization and Plotting Suite. http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/norm_methods.php (7 April 2016).Google Scholar
Wells, J.C. 1982. The accents of English, vol. 1, An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A. & Sloetjes, H.. 2006. ELAN: A Professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.Google Scholar