Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:00:44.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dialect perceptions in real time: A restudy of Miami-Cuban perceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Gabriela G. Alfaraz*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
*
*Address for correspondence: Gabriela G. Alfaraz, Department of Romance and Classical Studies, B-350 Wells Hall, 619 Red Cedar Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824-1027, Office: (517) 884-6343, Cell: (517) 303-4048. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Perceptual dialectology investigates nonlinguists’ beliefs about their own and other varieties. This paper fills a gap in longitudinal research in this area with a restudy of the perceptions of Miami Cubans carried out twelve years after the first study. Perceptions are examined in relation to social and demographic changes with a sample of 84 participants of Cuban origin who responded to a questionnaire about the correctness of regional varieties of Spanish. The results showed that perceptions of non-Cuban varieties remained relatively stable over time, continuing to correlate with race and poverty. Perceptions toward the Cuban Spanish of the Miami community were also stable and, as in the earlier study, were highly positive, reflecting strong beliefs in its correctness-status. In contrast, perceptions of Cuban Spanish on the island were significantly more negative; it was ranked the least correct of the regional varieties evaluated. Factors underlying perceptions are examined in relation to demographic changes, political ideology, and beliefs about race and poverty. This paper highlights the contribution of the longitudinal study of dialect perceptions to the understanding of language attitudes, intergroup relations, and language change.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfaraz, Gabriela G. 2002. Miami Cuban perceptions of varieties of Spanish. In Daniel Long & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2, 111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans & Kerswill, Paul. 2005. Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, Erica J. 2003. Folk linguistic perceptions and the mapping of dialect boundaries. American Speech 78. 307330.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, Bermudez, Nancy, Fung, Victor, Vargas, Rosalva & Edwards, Lisa. 2010. The normative north and the stigmatized south: Ideology and methodology in the perceptual dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics 36. 6287.Google Scholar
Dailey-O’Cain, J. 1999. The perception of post-unification German regional speech. In Dennis.R. Preston (ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 1, 227242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirci, Mahide. 2002. Gender differences in the perception of Turkish regional dialects. In Daniel Long & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2, 4150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Demirci, Mahide & Kleiner, Brian. 1998. Variation in the perception of Turkish dialects. Language Awareness 7. 206222.Google Scholar
Demirci, Mahide & Kleiner, Brain. 1999. The perception of Turkish dialects. In Dennis.R. Preston (ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 1, 261281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Evans, Betsy E. 2002. Attitudes of Montreal students towards varieties of French. In Daniel Long & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2, 7193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie & Bartlett, Kathryn. 2006. Correctness, pleasantness, and degree of difference ratings across regions. American Speech 81. 358386.Google Scholar
García, María Cristina. 1996. Havana USA: Cuban exiles and Cuban Americans in south Florida, 1959–1994. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Peter, Coupland, Nikolas & Williams, Angie. 2003. Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect ethnicity and performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15. 87105.Google Scholar
Hartley, Laura C. 2005. The consequences of conflicting stereotypes: Bostonian perceptions of U.S. dialects. American Speech 80. 388405.Google Scholar
Hartley, Laura C. & Preston, Dennis R.. 1999. The names of U.S. English: Valley girl, cowboy, yankee, normal, nasal and ignorant. In Tony Bex & Richard J. Watts (eds.), Standard English: The widening debate, 207238. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henken, Ted. 2005. Balseros, boteros, and el bombo: Post-1994 Cuban immigration to the United States and the persistence of special treatment. Latino Studies 3. 393416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontra, Miklós. 2002. Where is the ‘most beautiful’ and the ‘ugliest’ Hungarian spoken? In Daniel Long & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2, 205218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kuiper, Larry. 1999. Variation and the norm: Parisian perceptions of regional French. In Dennis.R. Preston (ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 1, 243260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kuiper, Larry. 2005. Perception is reality: Parisian and Provencal perceptions of regional varieties of French. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9. 2852.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. (Language in Society 29). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace. 1967. A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23. 91109.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M. 1994. Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Long, Daniel. 1999. Geographical perceptions of Japanese dialect regions. In Dennis.R. Preston (ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 1, 177198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R.. 2002. Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Daniel & Yim, Young-Cheol. 2002. Regional differences in the perception of Korean dialects. In Daniel Long & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2, 249275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martínez, Glenn A. 2003. Perceptions of dialect in a changing society: Folk linguistics along the Texas-Mexico border. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7. 3849.Google Scholar
Moreno Fernández, Juliana & Fernández, Francisco Moreno. 2002. Madrid perceptions of regional varieties in Spain. In Daniel Long & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2, 295320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A. & Preston, Dennis R.. 2000. Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo. 2009. El llamado Spanglish. In Enciclopedia del español en Estados Unidos. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes. 222247.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo & Stern, Nancy. 2010. On so-called Spanglish. International Journal of Bilingualism 15. 85100.Google Scholar
Pearce, Michael. 2009. A perceptual dialect map of North East English. Journal of English Linguistics 37. 162192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 2004. Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Preston, D.R. 1986. Five visions of America. Language in Society 15. 221240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1988. Change in the perception of language varieties. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical dialectology: Regional and social, 475504. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Where the worst English is spoken. In Edgar W. Schneider (ed.), Focus on the USA, 297360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1999. Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 1. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. Michigander talk: God’s own English. In Anne Curzan & Michael Adams (eds.), Contours of English and English language studies 1733. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van, Someren, Martin, W., Barnard Yvonne, F. & Sandberg, Jacobijn A.C.. 1994. The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar