Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:45:04.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Washington, D.C. Experience with Uncontrolled Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death: Promises and Pitfalls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jimmy A. Light
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As of January 1, 2008, over 98,000 people are waiting for organ transplants in the United States of America. Of those, nearly 75,000 are waiting for a kidney. In this calendar year, fewer than 15,000 will receive a kidney transplant from a deceased donor. The average waiting time for a deceased donor kidney now exceeds five years in virtually all metropolitan areas. Sadly, nearly as many people die waiting as there are deceased donors each year, despite monumental efforts by the entire transplant community to increase both the number of organ donors and the number of organs recovered from each donor. The imbalance between demand and supply has led to considerable efforts to expand the criteria for what is considered an acceptable organ donor by the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN), thereby hoping somewhat to assuage the shortfall of donor organs. So-called Expanded Criteria Donors (ECDs) may be older than 50, have history of hypertension, or have died from intracerebral hemorrhage and/or have impaired renal function. ECDs now make up nearly 40% of the donor population.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , Winter 2008 , pp. 735 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

United Network for Organ Sharing, available at <http://UNOS.org> (last visited October 1, 2008).+(last+visited+October+1,+2008).>Google Scholar
Childress, J. F. and Liverman, C. T., eds., Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2006): at 128–169.Google Scholar
Steinbrook, R., “Organ Donation after Cardiac Death,” New England Journal of Medicine 357, no. 3 (2007): 209–213.Google Scholar
D'Allesandro, A. M., “The Process of Donation after Cardiac Death: A US Perspective,” Transplantation Reviews 21, no. 4 (2007): 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagandeep, S., Matsuoka, L., Mateo, R., Cho, Y. W., Genyk, Y., Sher, L., Cicciarelli, J., Aswad, S., Jabbour, N. and Selby, R., “Expanding the Donor Kidney Pool: Utility of Renal Allografts Procured in a Setting of Uncontrolled Cardiac Death,” American Journal of Transplantation 6, no. 7 (2006): 1600–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Medicine, “Moving Forward in Increasing Organ Donation: Opportunities and Barriers to Uncontrolled DCDD in Major Metropolitan Cites,” December 20, 2006, available at <http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3740/24738/41298.aspx> (last visited October 1, 2008).+(last+visited+October+1,+2008).>Google Scholar
Kowalski, A. E., Light, J. A., Ritchie, W. O., Sasaki, T. M., Callender, C. O. and Gage, F. O., “A New Approach for Increasing the Organ Supply,” Clinical Transplantation 10, no. 6, pt. 2 (1996): 653–657.Google Scholar
Consensus Conference on Trauma Victims and Organ Donation, White Paper, Washington, D.C., October 7–8, 1993. (On file with author.)Google Scholar
The Institute of Medicine focused on uDCD candidates who suffered unexpected cardiac arrest; their estimations of potential uDCD donors did not include deaths due to traumatic head injury. However, at our hospital most uDCD candidates suffered head trauma and most were victims of violence.Google Scholar
Light, J. A., Kowalski, A. E., Sasaki, T. M., Barhyte, D. Y., Ritchie, W. O., Gage, F. and Harviel, J. D., “A Rapid Organ Recovery Program for Non-Heart-Beating Donors,” Transplantation Proceedings 29, no. 8 (1997): 3553–3556. The term “Rapid Organ Recovery” was recommended by our community-based advisory group. We found the term resonated better with the public than technical terms or acronyms like uDCD or NHBD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of the District of Columbia Report, District of Columbia Anatomical Gift Amendments Act of 1995, Bill 11–317 (December 7, 1995).Google Scholar
Light, J. A., Barhyte, D. Y., Gage, F., Sasaki, T. M. and Aquino, A. O., “Long-Term Graft Survival after Transplantation with Kidneys from Uncontrolled Nonheartbeating Donors,” Transplantation 68, no. 12 (1999): 1910–1912.Google Scholar
Ciesla, D. J., Trankiem, C. T., Light, J. A. and Sava, J. A., “QS413. Estimating the Potential for Organ Donation after Cardiac Death in an Urban Level I Trauma Center,” Journal of Surgical Research 144, no. 2 (2008): 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ Transplant Breakthrough Collaborative, available at <http://www.organdonationnow.org> (last visited October 1, 2008).+(last+visited+October+1,+2008).>Google Scholar