Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T09:45:58.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Health Law: The Professor's Viewpoint: Should We Say What We Think in the Classroom?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Charity Scott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
JLME Column
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , Fall 2007 , pp. 490 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Editor’s Note: This essay is the first in a new column devoted to the teaching of health law, policy, and ethics. University faculty often do not receive any training about teaching other than informal and anecdotal collegial advice. Most of us decide how to teach based on what we liked, or didn’t like, in the professors we had and on our own trial-and-error efforts in the classroom. Teaching is a lot like parenting: it is learned on the job and is rarely subjected (except in times of crisis) to external evaluation, testing, or outside expertise. Generally, each of us does what we feel comfortable doing. We do not seek educational authority or empirical proof to support our individual intuitions that what we do is what we should be doing. After the first few years, most of us stop even talking about our teaching, having settled into a comfortable style and a familiar set of textbooks. Because we should subject our teaching styles and goals to the same ongoing, critical analysis that we employ for the substantive topics in our classrooms and in our writings, this new column offers the opportunity to discuss the qualities of good teaching. I welcome your responses and your contributions to this ongoing column. – charity scott

References

Jaeckel, R., “Forced Politics and Law School,” The Docket at Georgia State University College of Law 12, no. 6 (April 2003): 4.Google Scholar
Jones, C. J. recounted this story and her own approach to self-disclosure in “Teaching Bioethics in the Law School Classroom: Recent History, Rapid Advances, the Challenges of the Future,” American Journal of Law & Medicine 20, no. 3 & 4 (1994): 417–437, at 424, n. 31, in a symposium volume dedicated to the memory of Jay Healey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S. Howard, Johnson, B. R. and Jennings Helweg, O., “God Talk by Professors within the Classrooms of Public Institutions of Higher Education: What Is Constitutionally Permissible?” Akron Law Review 25, no. 2 (1991): 289–314, at 289–90, 313–14 (arguing that “it would seem that professors who submit their world views for students' consideration are more honest and demonstrate greater concern for the whole student than professors who do not”).Google Scholar
Cramton, R. C., “Beyond the Ordinary Religion,” Journal of Legal Education 37, no. 4 (1987): 509–518, at 516. (“We pretend that we are technicians teaching technique in a value-neutral context in which every-one decides individually the uses to which technique is put. But the falseness of the pretense and the empty superficiality of much of what we do pushes many of us from time to time to invite an exploration of more serious matters by being open with our students and readers about our own fundamental commitments.” Id., at 513.)Google Scholar
See Calhoun, S. W., “Impartiality in the Classroom: A Personal Account of a Struggle to Be Evenhanded in Teaching about Abortion,” Journal of Legal Education 45, no. 1 (1995): 99–112, at 105.Google Scholar
Black, C. L. Jr., “Reflections on Teaching and Working in Constitutional Law,” Oregon Law Review 66, no. 1 (1987): 1–17, at 9.Google Scholar
Rhode, D. L., “Legal Education: Professional Interests and Public Values,” Indiana Law Review 34, no. 1 (2000): 23–45, at 24, 29–35.Google Scholar
Hayden, P. T., “Professorial Conflicts of Interest and ‘Good Practice’ in Legal Education,” Journal of Legal Education 50, no. 3 (2000): 358–371, at 371 (quoting Mallen, R. E. and Smith, J. M., Legal Malpractice, vol. 2, 4th ed., [West Publishing Co.: St. Paul, 1996]: Section 15.14, at 369).Google Scholar
Association of American Law Schools, Statement of Good Practices by Law Professors in the Discharge of Their Ethical and Professional Responsibilities (November 17, 1989, amended May 2003), available at <http://www.aals.org/about_handbook_sgp_eth.php> (last visited June 20, 2007). The same holds true for scholarship: “A law professor shall also disclose the fact that views or analysis expressed in any covered activity [including published work, oral or written presentations to conferences, drafting committees, legislatures, law reform bodies and the like, and expert testimony] were espoused or developed in the course of either paid or unpaid representation of or consultation with a client when a reasonable person would be likely to see that fact as having influenced the position taken by the professor.” Id.+(last+visited+June+20,+2007).+The+same+holds+true+for+scholarship:+“A+law+professor+shall+also+disclose+the+fact+that+views+or+analysis+expressed+in+any+covered+activity+[including+published+work,+oral+or+written+presentations+to+conferences,+drafting+committees,+legislatures,+law+reform+bodies+and+the+like,+and+expert+testimony]+were+espoused+or+developed+in+the+course+of+either+paid+or+unpaid+representation+of+or+consultation+with+a+client+when+a+reasonable+person+would+be+likely+to+see+that+fact+as+having+influenced+the+position+taken+by+the+professor.”+Id.>Google Scholar
See Hayden, , supra note 8, at 368.Google Scholar
Hess, G. F., “Heads and Hearts: The Teaching and Learning Environment in Law School,” Journal of Legal Education 52, no. 1 & 2 (2002): 75–111, at 89.Google Scholar
Id., at 105.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. A., “Self-Disclosure, Separation, and Students: Intimacy in the Clinical Relationship,” Indiana Law Review 27, no. 1 (1993): 115–155.Google Scholar
Id., at 117, 128, 131–32, 138, 154–55.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H., “On Showing Your Hand” (2003): 5 (unpublished manuscript on file with the author).Google Scholar