Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:23:17.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Health Care Reform and the Public's Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Corey S. Davis  and
Sarah Somers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA or the Act) into law. ACA aims to improve access to care and health outcomes through a number of mechanisms, including requiring most individuals to carry health insurance, prohibiting insurers from denying health insurance coverage based on pre-existing conditions, and creating exchanges through which individuals and families not eligible for employer- or government-sponsored health insurance may purchase coverage. While the Act is aimed primarily at improving individual health by increasing access to health insurance, it also contains a number of provisions targeted directly at improving health at the population level. Most of these provisions, which encompass a variety of disease prevention and access-to-care initiatives, are found in ACA Title IV.

Type
JLME Supplement
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 39 , Issue S1 , Spring 2011 , pp. 65 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Act was modified by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111–152,124 Stat. 1029, which was signed by President Obama on March 30, 2010. Throughout this paper we refer to this combined legislation, Pub. L. No. 111–148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), as “the ACA” or “the Act.”Google Scholar
Letter from Congressional Budget Office to the Honorable Nancy Pelosi (March 2010) (on file with authors) (providing an estimate of the budgetary effects of the reconciliation proposal, in combination with the effects of H.R. 3590, ACA, as passed by the Senate).Google Scholar
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111–148 § 2001(a)(1), 124 Stat. 271 (adding 42 USC § 1396a(a)(10(A) (i)(XVIII)).Google Scholar
Pub. L. No. 111–148 § 5000A, 124 Stat. 244; Pub. L. 111–152 § 1002, 124 Stat. 1032.Google Scholar
Pub. L. No. 111–148 § 1401, 124 Stat. 213; Pub. L. 111–152 § 1001, 124 Stat. 1030.Google Scholar
Id., at 1001, 124 Stat. 131 (amending 42 U.S.C. 300gg et seq.).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C.A § 300U-10 (2010).Google Scholar
Id., at § 300U-11.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Sebelius Announces New $250 Million Investment to Strengthen Primary Health Care Workforce, Press Release, available at <http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2010pres/06/20100616a.html> (last visited December 10, 2010); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HHS Awards Nearly $100 Million in Grants for Public Health and Prevention Priorities, available at <http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2010pres/09/20100924a.html> (last visited December 10, 2010).+(last+visited+December+10,+2010);+U.S.+Department+of+Health+and+Human+Services,+HHS+Awards+Nearly+$100+Million+in+Grants+for+Public+Health+and+Prevention+Priorities,+available+at++(last+visited+December+10,+2010).>Google Scholar
42 U.S.C.A. § 280g-10 (2010); See, e.g., Pub. L. No. 111–148 § 4106, 124 Stat. 559.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C.A. §§ 280h-4 to −5; 280k-1 to −3.Google Scholar
Pub. L. No. 111–148 §§ 4106, 4107, 124 Stat. 559.Google Scholar
29 U.S.C.A. § 794f; Pub. L. No. 111–148 § 4204, 124 Stat. 571.Google Scholar
Pub. L. No. 111–148 §§ 4108, 4201, 4202, 4306, 124 Stat. 561, 564,566, 587.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C.A. § 300–15; Pub. L. No. 111–148 § 4402, 124 Stat. 588.Google Scholar
Pub. L. No. 111–148 §§ 4205, 4207, 124 Stat. 573 577; Pub. L. No. 111–148 § 4004, 124 Stat. 544; 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 292d, 290bb-33; 42 U.S.CA. § 280m.Google Scholar
See Letter from Congressional Budget Office, supra note 2, at 2.Google Scholar
Officials from seven other states have since joined the suit. Florida v. Sebelius, No. 3:10-cv-00091 (N.D. Fla. 2010).Google Scholar
Va. Code Ann. § 38.2–3430.1 (2010); Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius, No. 3:10cv188 (E.D. Va. 2010).Google Scholar
The “Commerce Clause” grants Congress the power to “regulate Commerce … among the several States.” U.S. Const. art. I, § 8.Google Scholar
See United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass’n, 322 U.S. 533, 540 (1944) (“Perhaps no modern commercial enterprise directly affects so many persons in all walks of life as does the insurance business. Insurance touches the home, the family, and the occupation or the business of almost every person in the United States.”); Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) (upholding federal regulation of marijuana grown for home use as part of a national scheme for banning controlled substances).Google Scholar
U.S. Const, art. I, § 9 prohibits the levying of a direct tax “unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration.” This Article is modified by the 16th Amendment, which clarifies that “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.” U.S. Const, amend. XVI.Google Scholar
Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for injunction and Dismissing Plaintiffs’ First and Second Claims for Relief, Thomas More Law Center v. Barack Hussein Obama, No. 2:10-cv-11156 at 18 (Mich, E.D. 2010).Google Scholar
Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Liberty Univ. v. Geithner, No. 6:10-cv-00015 (W.D. Va. 2010).Google Scholar
Memorandum Opinion, Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius, No. 3:10-cv-188 (E.D. Va. 2010).Google Scholar