Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:57:40.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning Health System — Moving from Ethical Frameworks to Practical Implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Stephanie R. Morain ,
Mary A. Majumder  and
Amy L. McGuire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns: Currents in Contemporary Bioethics
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 47 , Issue 3: Biomarker Research and Validation: Current Challenges, Future Opportunities , Fall 2019 , pp. 454 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Institute of Medicine, Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine, Olsen, L. A., Aisner, D., and McGinnis, J. M., eds., The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007), available at <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53484/> (last visited August 6, 2019).Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Psek, W. A. et al., “Operationalizing the Learning Health Care System in an Integrated Delivery System,” eGEMS 3, no. 1 (2015): 1-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. et al., eds., Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2012): 1–450.Google Scholar
Greene, S. M., Reid, R. J., and Larson, E. B., “Implementing the Learning Health System: From Concept to Action,” Annals of Internal Medicine 157, no. 3 (2012): 207-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
James, B. C. and Savitz, L. A., “How Inter-mountain Trimmed Health Care Costs through Robust Quality Improvement Efforts,” Health Affairs 30, no. 6 (2011): 1185-1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abernathy, A. P., “Demonstrating the Learning Health System Through Practical Use Cases,” Pediatrics 134, no. 1 (2014): 171-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, C., Wong, A., and Blumenthal, D., “Achieving a Nationwide Learning Health System,” Science Translational Medicine 2, no 57 (2010): 50cm29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. Z. and Bonham, A. C., “Ethical Oversight of Research on Patient Care,” Hastings Center Report 43, no.S1 (2013): S2-S3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Largent, E. A., Joffe, S., and Miller, F. G., “Can Research and Care be Ethically Integrated?” Hastings Center Report 41, no. 4 (2011): 36-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, N. E. et al., “The Research-Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight,” Hastings Center Report 43, no. S1 (2013): S4-S15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, L. R., “Physician-investigator/Patient-subject: Exploring the Logic and the Tension,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5, no. 3 (1980): 215-224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, S. and Miller, F. G., “Bench to Bedside: Mapping the Moral Terrain of Clinical Research,” Hastings Center Report 38, no. 2 (2008): 30-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Kass, supra note 13.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Kass, N. E. and Faden, R. R., “Ethics and Learning Health Care: The Essential Roles of Engagement, Transparency, and Accountability,” Learning Health Systems 2, no. 4 (2018): e10066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, The Value of Engagement (Washington, DC: Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 2018), available at <https://www.pcori.org/about-us/our-programs/engagement/public-and-patient-engagement/value-engagement> (last visited June 5, 2019).+(last+visited+June+5,+2019).>Google Scholar
Concannon, T. W. et al., “A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-centered Outcomes Research,” Journal of General Internal Medicine 29, no. 12 (2014): 1692-1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitan, B. et al., “Assessing the Financial Value of Patient Engagement: A Quantitative Approach from CTTI's Patient Groups and Clinical Trials Project,” Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science 52, no.2 (2018): 220-229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Kass, supra note 18.Google Scholar
Joosten, Y. A. et al., “Community Engagement Studios: A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to InformRresearch,” Academic Medicine 90, no. 12 (2015): 1646-1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandl, K. D., Mandel, J. C., and Kohane, I. S., “Driving Innovation in Health Systems through an Apps-based Information Economy,” Cell Systems 1, no. 1 (2015): 8-15; Morain, S.R. and Largent, E. A., “Recruitment and Trial-finding Apps — Time for Rules of the Road,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute (forthcoming 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Largent, E. A., Lynch, H. F., and McCoy, M.S, “Patient-Engaged Research: Choosing the ‘Right’ Patients to Avoid Pitfalls,” Hastings Center Report 48, no. 5 (2018): 26-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. S. et al., “Patient and Public Involvement: Two Sides of the Same Coin or Different Coins Altogether?” Bioethics 33, no. 6 (2019): 708-715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morain, S. R., “Whom to Engage in Patient-Engaged Research? Reflection on Selection,” Hastings Center Report 48, no. 5 (2018): 35-36; Majumder, M.A. et al., “The Role of Participants in a Medical Information Commons,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 51-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M. K. et al., “Attitudes toward Risk and Informed Consent for Research on Medical Practices: A Cross-Sectional Survey,” Annals of Internal Medicine 162, no. 10 (2015): 690-696; Kass, N. et al., “Alternative Consent Models for Comparative Effectiveness Studies: Views of Patients from Two Institutions,” AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7, no. 2 (2016): 92-105; S.E. Kraft et al., “A Comparison of IRB and Patient Views on Consent for Research on Medical Practices,” Clinical Trials 13, no. 5 (2016): 555-565; S.R. Morain et al., “Stakeholder Perspectives Regarding Alternate Approaches to Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research,” Learning Health Systems 2, no. 2 (2018): e10047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, M. M. and Wolf, L. E., “The Havasupai Indian Tribe Case: Lessons for Research Involving Stored Biological Samples,” New England Journal of Medicine 363, no. 3 (2010): 204–207; M.H. Lewis, “Lessons from the Residual Newborn Screening Dried Blood Sample Litigation,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43, no. S1 (2015): 32–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Largent, supra note 12.Google Scholar
See Kass, supra note 18.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Balas, E. A. and Boren, S. A., “Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement,” in Bemmel, J. and McCray, A. T., eds., Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-Centered Systems (Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 2000): 65–70.Google Scholar
See Kass, supra note 18.Google Scholar
Morain, S. R., Kass, N. E., and Faden, R. R., “Learning is Not Enough: Earning Institutional Trustworthiness through Knowledge Translation,” American Journal of Bioethics 18, no. 4 (2018): 31-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See James, supra note 7.Google Scholar
McGuire, A. L. et al., “Importance of Participant-centricity and Trust for a Sustainable Medical Information Commons,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 12-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar