Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:38:52.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Medical Record Confidentiality and Data Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Beverly Woodward
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 25 , Issue 2-3 , Summer Fall 1997 , pp. 85 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (codified as amended in scattered sections of U.S.C. and I.R.C.) (1996).Google Scholar
S. 1360, 104th Cong. (1996).Google Scholar
Shalala, D.E., “Confidentiality of Individually-Identifiable Health Information: Recommendations of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, pursuant to section 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996” (visited at http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/admnsimp/index.htm).Google Scholar
See id. at § II.E3.Google Scholar
Id. at § I.I.Google Scholar
In the federal regulations regarding research on human subjects, “a medical record” is given as an example of “private information” which deserves the protections of the regulations. 45 C.F.R. § 46.102(f)(2) (1991) (“Definitions”).Google Scholar
“Medical Files, or Fishbowls?,” Washington Post, Sept. 23, 1997, at A16 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
See Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S. Ct. 1923 (1996).Google Scholar
See Hagey, J., “Privacy and Confidentiality Practices for Research with Health Information in Canada,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 25 (1997): At 137.Google Scholar
Phillips, B., Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 1996–97 Annual Report (visited at http://infoweb.magi.com/~privcan/annrep/english/table.html) (“A National Health Database”).Google Scholar
Feinleib, M., “The Epidemiologist's Responsibilities to Study Participants,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, Supp. 1 (1991): 73S–79S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id. at 77S.Google Scholar
Bruce Phillips comments: “Easy as it is to rationalize data gathering as beneficial for the individual and society, the information might not be used for benevolent purposes. The collection of medical data can slide imperceptibly from health care to medical supervision to lifestyle surveillance and, ultimately, to a more generalized form of surveillance by the state.” See Phillips, , supra note 10.Google Scholar
I would add that the “routine use” exceptions permitted by the federal Privacy Act appear to be the black hole of confidentiality with respect to records held by governmental agencies. Even the better privacy statutes and regulations cited by Richard Turkington do not protect sensitive information from being widely shared among federal and state agencies.Google Scholar