Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:17:31.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking (or the Unexpected Virtue of Pluralism)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Adrian Thorogood  and
Ma'n H. Zawati
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In an era of unrivalled sequencing, computation and networking capability, international sharing of genomic samples and data is becoming a modus operandi for modern medical research. Researchers are collaborating to establish large collections with global scale. Having never before set foot outside the cell, the molecules that shape us are being digitized and launched across the globe. Protecting individual privacy interests in this information is a central challenge of the genomic research era.

This article reviews international privacy norms governing human genomic biobanks and databases. It will not directly consider biobanks established for other health-related purposes, such as screening or therapy. A genomic biobank is “a hybrid infrastructure,” an organized collection of human biological material combined with associated health information: physical measurements, outcome data in medical records, and epidemiological information, as well as genomic data derived from the samples.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , Winter 2015 , pp. 690 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chalmers, D., “Medical Research: Future Directions in the Genome Era,” in Joly, Y. Knoppers, B. M., eds., Routledge Handbook of Medical Law and Ethics (Routledge: New York, 2015): At 303–318.Google Scholar
Id., at 312.Google Scholar
For scope of biobanking, see Rynning, E., “Legal Challenges and Strategies in the Regulation of Research Biobanking,” in Solbakk, J. H. Holm, S. Hofmann, B., eds., The Ethics of Research Biobanking (London: Springer US, 2009): At 281[hereinafter cited as Rynning].Google Scholar
Biobanks and the Public – Governing Biomedical Research Resources in Europe, A Report from the BBMRI Project (2013): At 16 [hereinafter cited as BBMRI]; Public Population Project in Genomics and Society, “Biobank Lexicon,” available at <http://www.p3g.org/biobank-lexicon/> (last visited March 6, 2015).+(last+visited+March+6,+2015).>Google Scholar
Knoppers, B. M. Zawati, M. H. Kirby, E., “Sampling Populations of Humans across the World: ELSI Issues,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 13 (2012): 395–413, at 397–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tassé, A.-M., “From ICH to IBH in Biobanking? A Legal Perspective on Harmonization, Standardization and Unification,” Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 7, no. 1 (2013): 1–15.Google Scholar
Oderkirk, J. Ronchi, E. Klazinga, N., “International Comparisons of Health System Performance among OECD Countries: Opportunities and Data Privacy Protection Challenges,” Health Policy 112, nos. 1–2 (2013): 9–18, at 12–15.Google Scholar
Di Iorio, C. T. et al. , “Cross-Border Flow of Health Information: Is ‘Privacy by Design’ Enough? Privacy Performance Assessment in EURIBOD,” European Journal of Public Health 23, no. 2 (2013): 247–253, at 247.Google Scholar
See Rynning, , supra note 3, at 278.Google Scholar
Kuner, C., Transborder Data Flows and Data Privacy Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013): At 63 [hereinafter cited as Kuner].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. Pang, T., “A Call for Global Governance of Biobanks,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 93, no. 2 (2015): 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HumGen, available at <http://www.humgen.org> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Kuner, , supra note 10, at 26.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), at Article 12, available at <http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as Universal Declaration of Human Rights].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+Universal+Declaration+of+Human+Rights].>Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), at Article 17, available at <http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989), at Article 16(1), available at <http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Universal Declaration of Human Rights, supra note 14, at Article 29(2).Google Scholar
European Parliament, Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data (1995), available at <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31995L0046:en:HTML> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
Reichel, J., “Need for Legitimate Regulatory Regime in Bioethics: A Global and European Perspective,” Missouri Law Review 78, no. 2 (2013): 465–487, at 483.Google Scholar
UNESCO, Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (1997), available at <http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/human-genome-and-human-rights/> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as UDHGHR].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+UDHGHR].>Google Scholar
UNESCO, International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (2003), available at <http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/human-genetic-data/> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as IDHGD].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+IDHGD].>Google Scholar
Id., at Article 4.Google Scholar
Id., at Article 14(a).Google Scholar
UNESCO, Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005), available at <http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/bioethics-and-human-rights/> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as UDBHR].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+UDBHR].>Google Scholar
Id., at Article 9.Google Scholar
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies (2009) [hereinafter cited as CIOMS Epi Guidelines]; see also, CIOMS and WHO, International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (2002), available at <http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
OECD, OECD Guidelines Governing the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data (1980), available at <http://habeasdatacolombia.uniandes.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/OECD_Privacy_Guidelines_1980.pdf> (last visited uOctober 15, 2015).+(last+visited+uOctober+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
OECD, OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data (2013), available at <http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/oecdguidelinesontheprotectionofprivacyandtransborderflowsofpersonaldata.htm> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as Data Protection Guidelines].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+Data+Protection+Guidelines].>Google Scholar
OECD, OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding (2007), available at <http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as Data from Public Funding Guidelines].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+Data+from+Public+Funding+Guidelines].>Google Scholar
OECD, OECD Recommendation on Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases (2009) [Biobanking Guidelines].Google Scholar
International Standards on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy: The Madrid Resolution, Joint Proposal for a Draft of International Standards on the Protection of Privacy with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data, available at <http://www.privacycommission.be/sites/privacycommission/files/documents/international_standards_madrid_2009.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as Madrid Resolution].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+Madrid+Resolution].>Google Scholar
World Medical Association, Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (2008), available at <http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as Declaration of Helsinki].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+Declaration+of+Helsinki].>Google Scholar
Lowrance, W. W., Privacy, Confidentiality, and Health Research (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012): At 54–55 [hereinafter cited as Lowrance].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Declaration of Helsinki, supra note 32, at Article 9.Google Scholar
Elger, B., ed., Ethical Issues of Human Genetic Databases: A Challenge to Classical Health Research Ethics? (Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2010): At 4 [hereinafter cited as Elger].Google Scholar
World Medical Association, Declaration on Ethical Considerations regarding Health Databases (2002), at Article 4, available at <http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/d1/> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
HUGO Ethics Committee, Statement on DNA Sampling: Control and Access (1998), available at <http://www.hugo-international.org/img/dna_1998.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as 1998 HUGO Statement]; HUGO Ethics Committee, Statement on Human Genomic Databases (2002), available at <http://www.hugo-international.org/img/genomic_2002.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as 2002 HUGO Statement].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+1998+HUGO+Statement];+HUGO+Ethics+Committee,+Statement+on+Human+Genomic+Databases+(2002),+available+at++(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+2002+HUGO+Statement].>Google Scholar
Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Constitution for Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (2014), available at <http://genomicsandhealth.org/files/public/GlobalAlliance_Final_0.pdf> (last visited March 6, 2015).+(last+visited+March+6,+2015).>Google Scholar
GA4GH, Framework for Responsible Sharing of Genomic and Health-Related Data (2014), available at <http://genomicsandhealth.org/about-the-global-alliance/key-documents/framework-responsible-sharing-genomic-and-health-related-data> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as Framework].+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+Framework].>Google Scholar
P3G-IPAC website, available at <http://p3g.org/ipac> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER), Best Practices for Repositories: Collection, Storage, Retrieval and Distribution of Biological Materials for Research (2012), available at <http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.isber.org/resource/resmgr/Files/ISBER_Best_Practices_3rd_Edi.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015) [hereinafter cited as ISBER Best Practices]; see also, World Health Organization and International Agency for Research on Cancer, Common Minimum Technical Standards and Protocols for Biological Resource Centres Dedicated to Cancer Research, Working Group Reports (2007): At vol. 2; BBMRI, supra note 4.+(last+visited+October+15,+2015)+[hereinafter+cited+as+ISBER+Best+Practices];+see+also,+World+Health+Organization+and+International+Agency+for+Research+on+Cancer,+Common+Minimum+Technical+Standards+and+Protocols+for+Biological+Resource+Centres+Dedicated+to+Cancer+Research,+Working+Group+Reports+(2007):+At+vol.+2;+BBMRI,+supra+note+4.>Google Scholar
Taylor, M., Genetic Data and the Law: A Critical Perspective on Privacy Protection (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013): At 20.Google Scholar
Landau, S., “Control Use of Data to Protect Privacy,” Science 347, no. 6221 (2015): 504–506, at 504.Google Scholar
For samples, see ISBER Best Practices, supra note 41, at L2.200; Forsberg, J. S. Hansson, M. G. Evers, K., “International Guidelines on Biobank Research Leave Researchers in Ambiguity: Why Is This So?” European Journal of Epidemiology 28, no. 6 (2013): 449–451, at 449 [hereinafter cited as Forsberg].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Declaration of Helsinki, supra note 32, at Article 26.Google Scholar
See CIOMS Guidelines, supra note 26, at Articles 4, 18.Google Scholar
See UDHGHR, supra note 20, at Article 5(b); See IGHGD, supra note 21, at Article 6(d); see UDBHR, supra note 23, at Article 6(2).Google Scholar
Tzanou, M., “Data Protection as a Fundamental Right Next to Privacy? ‘Reconstructing’ a Not so New Right,” International Data Privacy Law 3, no. 2 (2013): 88–99, at 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosseim, P. Brady, M., “Policy by Procrastination: Secondary Use of Electronic Health Records for Health Research Purposes,” McGill Journal of Law and Health 2, no. 1 (2008): 5–45, at 17 [hereinafter cited as Kosseim].Google Scholar
See Elger, , supra note 35.Google Scholar
See UDHGHR, supra note 20, at Article 6(2).Google Scholar
See IGHGD, supra note 21, at Article 2; See UDHGHR, supra note 20, at Article 6(d).Google Scholar
Master, Z. Nelson, E. Murdoch, B. Caulfield, T., “Biobanks, Consent and Claims of Consensus,” Nature Methods 9, no. 9 (2012): 885–888, at 885.Google Scholar
Steinsbekk, K. S. Kåre Myskja, B. Solberg, B., “Broad Consent Versus Dynamic Consent in Biobank Research: Is Passive Participation an Ethical Problem?” European Journal of Human Genetics 21, no. 9 (2013): 897–902, at 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec, Final Report – Advisory Group on a Governance Framework for Data Banks and Biobanks Used for Health Research (2006), at 59–60, available at <http://www.frsq.gouv.qc.ca/en/ethique/pdfs_ethique/Rapport_groupe_conseil_anglais.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Forsberg, et al. , supra note 44.Google Scholar
Hofmann, B., “Broadening Consent – and Diluting Ethics?” Journal of Medical Ethics 35, no. 2 (2009): 125–129, at 128.Google Scholar
Greely, H. T., “The Uneasy Ethical and Legal Underpinnings of Large-Scale Genomic Biobanks,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 8 (2007): 343–364, at 358.Google Scholar
Caulfield, T. Knoppers, B. M., Consent, Privacy & Research Biobanks, Policy Directions Brief Number 1, 2009–2010 Series on Genetic Information, Genome Canada (January 26, 2010): 1–10, at 4–5, available at <http://www.genomecanada.ca/medias/pdf/en/GPS-Policy-Directions-Brief.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015); Nomper, A., Open Consent: A New Form of Informed Consent for Population Genetic Databases (Tartu: Tartu ülikooli kirjastus, 2005).Google Scholar
Knoppers, B. M. Abdul-Rahman (Zawati), M. H., “Biobanks in the Literature,” in Elger, B. et al. , eds., Ethical Issues in Governing Biobanks: Global Perspectives (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008): At 14 [hereinafter cited as Knoppers].Google Scholar
See Lowrance, , supra note 33, at 75–76, 118.Google Scholar
Knoppers, B. M. et al. , “Framing Genomics, Public Health Research and Policy: Points to Consider,” Public Health Genomics 13, no. 4 (2010): 224–234, at 231.Google Scholar
See Knoppers, Abdul-Rahman, , supra note 60.Google Scholar
UNESCO, Report of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC) on Consent, 2008, at para 54 [hereinafter cited as UNESCO IBC].Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30; ISBER Best Practices, supra note 41, at 28; See also ISBER Best Practices, supra note 41, at L2.200.Google Scholar
See 1998 HUGO Statement, supra note 37; 2002 HUGO Statement, supra note 37, at Rec 4(c); UNESCO IBC, supra note 64, at para. 50.Google Scholar
See Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 4E, F.Google Scholar
See 2002 HUGO Statement, supra note 37, at 4d; Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 61, Article 4.4.Google Scholar
GA4GH Framework, supra note 35, at “Core Elements”.Google Scholar
See UDBHR, supra note 23, at Article 6(2).Google Scholar
Melham, K. et al. , “The Evolution of Withdrawal: Negotiating Research Relationships in Biobanking,” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10, no. 16 (2014): 1–13; see ISBER Best Practices, supra note 41, at L2.200.Google Scholar
See IDHGD, supra note 21, at Article 9(a); CIOMS Epi Guidelines, supra note 26, at Guideline 5; OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 42–43.Google Scholar
Kaye, J., “The Tension between Data Sharing and the Protection of Privacy in Genomics Research,” in Mascalzoni, , ed., Ethics, Law and Governance of Biobanking (New York: 2015): 101–120, at 105.Google Scholar
Taylor, , supra note 42, at 94.Google Scholar
See IDHGD, supra note 21, at Article 16(a–b).Google Scholar
See UNESCO IBC, supra note 64, at para 53.Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at Article 33.Google Scholar
See Declaration of Helsinki, supra note 32, at Article 32.Google Scholar
See 1998 HUGO Statement, supra note 37.Google Scholar
See GA4GH Framework, supra note 39, at “Core Elements.”Google Scholar
See CIOMS Epi Guidelines, supra note 26, at Guideline 4 b).Google Scholar
See Kaye, , supra note 73, at 112.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. Callier, S., “How Anonymous Is ‘Anonymous’? Some Suggestions towards a Coherent Universal Coding System for Genetic Samples,” Journal of Medical Ethics 38, no. 5 (2012): 304–309, at 304.Google Scholar
See Lowrance, , supra note 33, at 87.Google Scholar
Knoppers, B. M. Chadwick, R., “Human Genetic Research: Emerging Trends in Ethics,” Nature Reviews Genetics 6, no. 1 (2005): 75–79, at 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See 1998 HUGO Statement, supra note 37; International Conference on Harmonisation, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Definitions for Genomic Biomarkers, Pharmacogenomics, Phamacogenetics, Genomic Data and Sample Coding Categories E15 (2007), at 3–4, available at <http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E15/Step4/E15_Guideline.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
See IDHGD, supra note 21, at Article 2.Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 14(c-e); 1998 HUGO Statement, supra note 37.Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, Annotation at 37; OECD Data from Public Funding Guidelines, supra note 29, at D.Google Scholar
Thorogood, A. et al. , “An Implementation Framework for the Feedback of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings in Research,” BMC Medical Ethics 15, no. 88 (2014): 1–13, at 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See IDHGD, supra note 21, at Preamble.Google Scholar
See El Emam, supra note 82, at 3.Google Scholar
See Kosseim, , supra note 49, at 28.Google Scholar
See Lowrance, , supra note 33, at 118.Google Scholar
Gymrek, M. et al. , “Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference,” Science 339, no. 6112 (2013): 321–324.Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 6.4.Google Scholar
See ISBER Best Practices, supra note 41, at L2.300.Google Scholar
See, e.g., OECD Data Protection Guidelines, supra note 28, at 24.Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 6.3.Google Scholar
GA4GH Framework, supra note 39, at “Core Elements.”Google Scholar
Id., at 5C, 22.22; ISBER Best Practices supra note 41, at M2.100; GA4GH Framework, supra note 39; Madrid Resolution, supra note 32, at 10.1.Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 7A, 6.8; GA4GH Framework, supra note 39, at “Accountability.”Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 2.3,7.3.Google Scholar
See ISBER Best Practices supra note 41, at M2.200.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See, e.g., OECD Data Protection Guidelines, supra note 28; Madrid Resolution, supra note 32, at 10.2; OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 66; GA4GH Framework, supra note 39 which imposes some of these as freestanding duties on all of its members; ISBER Best Practices, supra note 41, at M2.610 (sample), M2.620 (data).Google Scholar
See, e.g., OECD Data Protection Guidelines, supra note 28, at 16; Madrid Resolution, supra note 32, at 10.1.Google Scholar
GA4GH Framework, supra note 30, at; GA4GH, “Consent,” available at <http://genomicsandhealth.org/our-work/current-initiatives/consent> (last visited March 6, 2015).+(last+visited+March+6,+2015).>Google Scholar
Kaye, , supra note 73, at 113.Google Scholar
See Universal Declaration of Human Rights, supra note 14, at Article 27; UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966, available at <http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
See UDHGHR, supra note 20, at Article 24; See IDHGD, supra note 21, at Article 18.Google Scholar
Wellcome Trust, “Sharing Research Data to Improve Public Health: Full Joint Statement by Funders of Health Research,” available at <http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Data-sharing/Public-health-and-epidemiology/WTDV030690.htm> (last visited October 15, 2015). A list of agency signatories can also be found on the website.+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).+A+list+of+agency+signatories+can+also+be+found+on+the+website.>Google Scholar
See OECD Data from Public Funding Guidelines, supra note 29, at J; see, e.g., OECD Data Protection Guidelines, supra note 28, at 11.Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 6.5,6.6.Google Scholar
Id., at Articles 7–8.Google Scholar
Global Alliance for Genomics & Health, “Privacy and Security Policy,” available at <http://genomicsandhealth.org/our-work/current-initiatives/privacy-and-security-policy> (last visited March 6, 2015).+(last+visited+March+6,+2015).>Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 3A; GA4GH Framework, supra note 39, at “Core Elements.”Google Scholar
See OECD Biobanking Guidelines, supra note 30, at 8C.Google Scholar
Id., at 6.1.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Data Protection Guidelines, supra note 28, at 22.Google Scholar
See Framework, , supra note 39, at “Accountability.”Google Scholar
Bamberger, K. A. Mulligan, D. K., “Privacy on the Books and on the Ground,” Stanford Law Review 63, no. 2 (2011): 247–316, at 275–276.Google Scholar
OECD Data Protection Guidelines, supra note 28, at 27.Google Scholar
GA4GH, “Accountability Policy,” available at <http://genomicsandhealth.org/our-work/current-initiatives/accountability-policy> (last visited March 6, 2015).+(last+visited+March+6,+2015).>Google Scholar
Enderink, M. Chin, G., “The End of Privacy: From Big Data to Ubiquitous Internet Connections, Technology Empowers Researchers and the Public – but Makes Traditional Notions of Privacy Obsolete,” Science 347, no. 6221 (2015): 490–491, at 490.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, The Collection, Linking and Use of Data in Biomedical Research and Health Care (2015), at xi, available at <http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Biological_and_health_data_web.pdf> (last visited October 15, 2015).+(last+visited+October+15,+2015).>Google Scholar
Dove, E. S. et al. , “Genomic Cloud Computing: Legal and Ethical Points to Consider,” European Journal of Human Genetics (2014).Google Scholar
See Kuner, , supra note 10, at 160.Google Scholar
Krisch, N., “The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law,” European Journal of International Law 17, no. 1 (2006): 247–278, at 269–270, 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzin-Frankel, J., “Trust Me, I'm a Medical Researcher,” Science 347, no. 6221 (2015): 501–503, at 502–503.Google Scholar
Id., at 483–484.Google Scholar