Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:20:00.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health as a Basic Human Need: Would This Be Enough?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Thana Cristina de Campos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our society is obsessed with health. At every second, everywhere, we are surrounded and overwhelmed by distressing calls on how vital it is to adopt a healthy lifestyle. While incorporating a healthy diet and physical exercise into our routines are the foremost commandments, everything from tobacco to refined sugars, trans fat, excessive alcohol, caffeine, and even eggs are declared public evils. Yet there is hope: medicines will save us! And indeed medicines exist available for all kinds of human afflictions. There are pills to help you relax and forget about stress, while some others, on the contrary, can keep you miraculously alert. There are pills that heal your most unbearable pains, physical or emotional, wherever their location — the head, back, quadriceps, heart, or soul. Though they may cause your stomach to burn, that is easily remedied by taking a complementary pill that will neutralize your stomach acidity with only some minor and negligible side effects elsewhere. There are also magic pills that promise you happiness, by giving you the power to thrive and the endurance to conquer the world. They ignite your hunger for achievement, but also for extra sugar and saturated fat.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , Summer 2012 , pp. 251 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Constitution of the WHO, 22 July 1946, Preamble.Google Scholar
Clapham, A. Robinson, M. Mahon, C. Jerbi, S., Realizing the Right to Health – Swiss Human Rights Book, vol. 3 (Zurich: Ruffer & Rub, 2009): At 17.Google Scholar
Toebes, B., “The Right to Health,” in Eide, A. Krause, C. Rosas, A., eds., Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd ed. (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 2001): 169–190, at 170.Google Scholar
UN Doc: E/C.12/2000/4, August 11, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at paragraph 6.Google Scholar
Id., at paragraph 4.Google Scholar
Id., at paragraph 1.Google Scholar
Id., at paragraph 11.Google Scholar
Id., at paragraph 42.Google Scholar
See Clapham, Robinson, Mahon, Jerbi, , supra note 2, at 17.Google Scholar
UN Doc: E/CN.4/2003/58, February 13, 2003, at paragraph 20.Google Scholar
Constitution of the WHO, July 22, 1946, at Preamble.Google Scholar
The Plos Medicines Editors, “Drug Companies Should Be Held More Accountable for Their Human Rights Responsibilities,” Plos Medicines 7, no. 9 (September 2010). Editorial, “Right-to-Health Responsibilities of Pharmaceutical Companies,” The Lancet 373, no. 9680 (June 13, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GlaxoSmithKline, Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in Relation to Access to Medicines - GSKComments, 2008, at 2, available at <http://www.essex.ac.uk/human_rights_centre/research/rth/comments.aspx> (last visited May 21, 2012).+(last+visited+May+21,+2012).>Google Scholar
Id., at 1.Google Scholar
GlaxoSmithKline, GlaxoSmithKline Statement in Response to Paul Hunt's Report on GSK (A/HRC/11/12/Add.2) June 2009, June 2009. Available at <www.gsk.com/responsibility/down-loads/GlaxoSmithKline-Statement-in-response-to-the-Paul-Hunt-Report-on-GSK.pdf> (last visited May 21, 2012). (last visited May 21, 2012).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=17+GlaxoSmithKline,+GlaxoSmithKline+Statement+in+Response+to+Paul+Hunt's+Report+on+GSK+(A/HRC/11/12/Add.2)+June+2009,+June+2009.+Available+at++(last+visited+May+21,+2012).>Google Scholar
Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk comments on the Draft Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in Relations to Access to Medicines, available at <http://www.essex.ac.uk/human_rights_centre/research/rth/comments.aspx> (last visited May 21, 2012).+(last+visited+May+21,+2012).>Google Scholar
J. L. Sturchio's letter to Hunt, Paul, Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in Relation to Access to Medicines, prepared by United Nations Special Rapporteur, Paul Hunt – Response from Merck & Co., Inc., February 29, 2008, available at <http://www.essex.ac.uk/human_rights_centre/research/rth/comments.aspx> (last visited May 21, 2012).Google Scholar
The fact that it is available is probably superfluous in the example, since its scarcity would probably be reflected in the price. Being cheap, the pill should not be scarce or difficult to get hold of, unless the price is controlled by the authority or subject to some other distortion. I am thankful to Mr. Francisco J. Urbina for making this point clear.Google Scholar
Griffin, J., Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance, OUP, 1986, at 40.Google Scholar
Id., at 41.Google Scholar
David Miller explains basic human needs in terms of “minimum decency,” “harm-avoidance,” and “moral urgency.” (Miller, D., National Responsibility and Global Justice, OUP, 2007A, at 181; Miller, D., Human Rights, Basic Needs, & Scarcity, Centre for the Study of Social Justice and Department of Politics and International Relations, Working Paper Series, SJ007, May 2007, at 5). David Braybrooke defines basic needs as the “conditions to live and function adequately” in Meeting Needs (Princeton, Princeton University Press: 1987): At 31. Jeremy Waldron gives a complementary yet similar definition, explaining basic human needs in terms of a “bearable” life in “dignity.” (Waldron, J., Rights and Needs: The Myth of Disjunction, in Sarat, A. Kearns, T. R., Legal Rights – Historical and Philosophical Perspectives [Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1997]: At 92, 105). David Wiggins, by his turn, emphasize that basic needs are “categorical” and “absolute” (Wiggins, D. Dermen, S., “Needs, Need, Needing,” Journal of Medical Ethics 13[1987]: 62–68, at 64). Both Waldron and Wiggins also emphasize that basic human needs shape the duties and responsibilities we owe to each other as human beings with equal dignity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., Human Rights, Basic Needs, & Scarcity, Centre for the Study of Social Justice and Department of Politics and International Relations, Working Paper Series, SJ007, May 2007, at 180.Google Scholar
Id., at 181.Google Scholar
Id., at 181–2, n.27.Google Scholar
Id., at 182.Google Scholar
Id., at 181.Google Scholar
Id., at 182.Google Scholar
Engaging with the capability approach, first proposed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, see Ariana, P. Naveed, A., “Health,” in Deneulin, S. Shahani, L., eds., An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach – Freedom and Agency, London: Earthscan, 2009): Chapter 10, at 228–45, available at <http://web.idrc.ca/opene-books/470–3/> (last visited May 23, 2012), and Ruger, J. P., Health and Social Justice, OUP, 2010. For an alternative Rawlsian-based approach, see Daniels, N., Just Health – Meeting Health Needs Fairly, CUP, 2008.Google Scholar
I borrow these two terms “escapable morbidity” and “premature mortality” from Ruger, J. P., id., at 61, which she defines as the two central health capabilities.Google Scholar
This point is fully developed by Pavlos Eleftheradis in his contribution for this symposium edition, when he explains the content of the right to health care. Far more than a fixed list of health needs, the key idea of a right to health care, which has to be protected by any public institution, is the equal liberty of persons conceived as citizens. And this is so, as he argues, because the right to health care cannot be understood as a mere fixed list of political goals. Instead, the right to health care has to be understood as a relational concept: Consisting in relations between persons and concerning the meaning of our actions in terms of health. (Eleftheriadis, P., “The Right to Health Care,” Journal of Law, Medicines & Ethics 40, no. 2 [2012]: 268–285).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J., Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986): At 41 (note 21).Google Scholar
Id., at 42.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Griffin, J., On Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at 101.Google Scholar
See Griffin, , supra note 33, at 42.Google Scholar
Id., at 45, 55.Google Scholar
Id., at 55; see Griffin, , supra note 37, 180.Google Scholar
Id. (Griffin, 1986), at 43.Google Scholar
I am grateful for Mr. Francisco Urbina for making this distinction clear.Google Scholar
See Griffin, , supra note 33, at 42.Google Scholar
Endicott, T., Vagueness in Law, OUP, 2002, at chap. 7.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Pogge, T., “Politics as Usual – What Lies behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric,” Polity, 2010, at 11–12.Google Scholar
“This notion of the minimum ingredients of a worthwhile human life is indispensible to moral theory.” See Griffin, , supra note 33, at 43.Google Scholar
See Griffin, , supra note 37.Google Scholar
Id., at 33.Google Scholar
Id., at 44.Google Scholar
Id., at 41.Google Scholar
Id., at 46.Google Scholar
Griffin explains that certain desires (that he calls informed-desires) have such a significance in one's life (or, as he puts it, have such a prudential value in one's existence) that it becomes a central element of one's worthwhile living.Google Scholar
I am grateful to Thomas Pogge for coming up with these examples.Google Scholar
For instance: (1) the personal responsibility of the smoker in engaging in an optional conduct that has a foreseeable high risk for his health carries normative relevance; (2) the adequate social restitution to the segregated neighborhood harmed by their representative authorities also carry normative weight, and indicates that it would be fair that the community as a whole remedy that harm; (3) avoiding ethnic stigmatization is a common concern of public policies, thus avoiding the stigmatization related to this hypothetical allergic reaction manifested only on black-skinned people also carries a normative significance. The list specifying various other cases bearing normative weight goes on.Google Scholar
See Griffin, , supra note 33, at 51.Google Scholar
Id., at 55.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Griffin, , supra note 37.Google Scholar
Id., at 89, 90.Google Scholar
Id., at 101.Google Scholar
See Griffin, , supra note 33, at 52.Google Scholar
See Griffin, , supra note 37, at 183.Google Scholar
Id., at 45.Google Scholar
Id., at 44–48, 51.Google Scholar
Id., at 45.Google Scholar
Id., at 67.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at 101.Google Scholar
Id., at 84, 86, 94, 101.Google Scholar
Id., at 92.Google Scholar
Id., at 95.Google Scholar
Id., at 87, 88.Google Scholar
Id., at 95.Google Scholar
Id., at 85.Google Scholar
Id., at 86.Google Scholar
Id., at 94.Google Scholar
Id., at 94.Google Scholar
Id., at 88.Google Scholar
Id., at 95.Google Scholar
Id., at 67.Google Scholar
Id., at 46.Google Scholar
Id., at 100.Google Scholar
Id., at 100.Google Scholar
“My account can therefore be seem as a kind of need account: What is needed to function as a normative agent.” See Griffin, , supra note 37, at 90.Google Scholar
Id., at 180.Google Scholar
Id., at 87, 88.Google Scholar