Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:56:38.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethical Considerations in the Conduct of Unregulated mHealth Research: Expert Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Abstract

To assist in resolving ethical questions surrounding unregulated mHealth research, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with experts from four key stakeholder groups: patient/research advocates, researchers, regulatory professionals, and mobile app/device developers. They discussed challenges and potential solutions in the context of two hypothetical scenarios involving unregulated mHealth research, including notifications/permissions for research use of mHealth data, data access procedures, new primary data collection, offering individual research results, and data sharing and dissemination.

Type
Symposium Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Research2Guidance, mHealth App Economics 2017/2018: Current Status and Future Trends in Mobile Health, available at <https://research2guidance.com/product/mhealth-economics-2017-current-status-and-future-trends-in-mobile-health/> (last visited January 10, 2020); Research2Guidance, mHealth App Economics: Connectivity in Digital Health, available at <https://research2guidance.com/product/connectivity-in-digital-health/> (last visited January 10, 2020).+(last+visited+January+10,+2020);+Research2Guidance,+mHealth+App+Economics:+Connectivity+in+Digital+Health,+available+at++(last+visited+January+10,+2020).>Google Scholar
Rothstein, M.A., Wilbanks, J.T., and Brothers, K.B., “Citizen Science on Your Smartphone: An ELSI Research Agenda,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 4, no. 3 (2015): 897-903; Dorsey, E.R. et al., “The Use of Smartphones for Health Research,” Academic Medicine 92, no. 2 (2017): 157-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, M.A. et al., “Unregulated Health Research Using Mobile Devices: Ethical Principles and Policy Recommendations,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 48, no. 1, Suppl. (2020): 196-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, D., Covington, M.A., and Covington, M.M., Dictionary of Computer and Internet Terms, 8th ed. (Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series, 2003): at 171.Google Scholar
Namey, E.E. and Trotter, R.T., “Qualitative Research Methods,” in Guest, G.S. and Namey, E.E., eds., Public Health Research Methods (California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2015): at 447.Google Scholar
Guest, G., Bunce, A., and Johnson, L., “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability,” Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006): 59-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beskow, L.M. et al., “Expert Perspectives on Oversight for Unregulated mHealth Research: Empirical Data and Commentary,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 48, no. 1, Suppl. (2020): 138-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacQueen, K.M. et al., “Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis,” Cultural Anthropology Methods 10, no. 2 (1998): 31–6.Google Scholar
Rothstein et al., supra note 3; Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) Working Group Report to the Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH, The Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program – Building a Research Foundation for 21st Century Medicine), available at <https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/DRAFT-PMI-WG-Report-9-11-2015-508.pdf> (last visited January 10, 2020); All of Us Research Program, Operational Protocol (March 28, 2018), available at <https://allofus.nih.gov/sites/default/files/aou_operational_protocol_v1.7_mar_2018.pdf> (last visited January 10, 2020); Dorsey, E.R. et al., “The Use of Smartphones for Health Research,” Academic Medicine 92, no. 2 (2017): 157-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayena, E. and Tasioulas, J., “Adapting Standards: Ethical Oversight of Participant-Led Health Research,” PLoS Medicine 10, no. 3 (2013): 1-5; Lynn, S.J. et al., “Designing a Platform for Ethical Citizen Science: A Case Study of CitSci.org,” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4, no. 1: (2019) 1-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beskow et al., supra note 7.Google Scholar