Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:58:19.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Groups Have Moral Standing in Unregulated mHealth Research?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Joon-Ho Yu  and
Eric Juengst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biomedical research using data from participants’ mobile devices borrows heavily from the ethos of the “citizen science” movement, by delegating data collection and transmission to its volunteer subjects. This engagement gives volunteers the opportunity to feel like partners in the research and retain a reassuring sense of control over their participation. These virtues, in turn, give both grass-roots citizen science initiatives and institutionally sponsored mHealth studies appealing features to flag in recruiting participants from the public. But while grass-roots citizen science projects are often community-based, mHealth research ultimately depends on the individuals who own and use mobile devices. This inflects the ethos of mHealth research towards a celebration of individual autonomy and empowerment, at the expense of its implications for the communities or groups to which its individual participants belong. But the prospects of group harms — and benefits — from mHealth research are as vivid as they are in other forms of data-intensive “precision health” research, and will be important to consider in the design of any studies using this approach.

Type
Symposium Articles
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 48 , Issue S1: Unregulated Health Research Using Mobile Devices , Spring 2020 , pp. 122 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Levine, C. et al., “The Limitations of ‘Vulnerability’ as a Protection for Human Research Participants,” American Journal of Bioethics 4, no. 3 (2004): 44-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, J., Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in An Age of Genomics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005); Juengst, E.T., “Groups as Gatekeepers to Genomic Research: Conceptually Confusing, Morally Hazardous, and Practically Useless,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8, no. 2 (1998): 183-200; Fong, M., Braun, K.L., and Chang, R.M., “Native Hawaiian Preferences for Informed Consent and Disclosure of Results from Genetic Research,” Journal of Cancer Education 21, Supp.1 (2006): S47-52.Google Scholar
Beskow, L.M., Hammack, C.M., and Brelsford, K.M., “Thought Leader Perspectives on Benefits and Harms in Precision Medicine Research,” PLoS ONE 13 (2018): e0207842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Burchard, E.G., “The Importance of Race and Ethnic Background in Biomedical Research and Clinical Practice,” New England Journal of Medicine 348, no. 12 (2003): 1170-1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, K.M. et al., “Precisely Where Are We Going? Charting the New Terrain of Precision Prevention,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 18 (2017): 369-387; Sabatello, M. and Appelbaum, P.S., “The Precision Medicine Nation,” Hastings Center Report 47, no. 4 (2017): 19-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D., “Protecting Groups from Genetic Research,” Bioethics 22, no. 3 (2008): 157-165; Hausman, D.M., “Group Risks, Risks to Groups, and Group Engagement in Genetics Research,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17, no. 4 (2007): 351-369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juengst, E.T., “FACE Facts: Why Human Genetics Will Always Provoke Bioethics,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32, no. 2 (2004): 267-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, et al., “Investigating the Potential for Ethnic Group Harm in Collaborative Genomics Research in Africa: Is Ethnic Stigmatisation Likely?” Social Science & Medicine 75, no. 8 (2012): 1400-1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Hausman, supra note 7.Google Scholar
McGregor, J., “Racial, Ethnic, and Tribal Classifications in Biomedical Research with Biological and Group Harm,” American Journal of Bioethics 10 (2010): 23-24; McGregor, J.L., “Population Genomics and Research Ethics with Socially Identifable Groups,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (2007): 356-370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at 24.Google Scholar
Tsosie, R., “Cultural Challenges to Biotechnology: Native American Genetic Resources and the Concept of Cultural Harm,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (2007): 396-411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A.P. and Von Hirsch, A., Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Mittelstadt, B.D. and Floridi, L., “The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts,” Science and Engineering Ethics 22, no. 2 (2016): 303-341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, A. and Borenstein, J., “The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity,” Science and Engineering Ethics 24, no. 5 (2018): 1521-1536; Courtland, R., “Bias Detectives: the Researchers Striving to Make Algorithms Fair,” Nature 558, no. 7710 (2018): 357-360.Google Scholar
Johnston, J., “Resisting a Genetic Identity: The Black Seminoles and Genetic Tests of Ancestry,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31, no. 2 (2003): 262-271; Shriver, M.D. and Kittles, R.A., “Genetic Ancestry and the Search for Personalized Genetic Histories,” Nature Reviews Genetics 5, no. 8 (2004): 611-618; Skinner, D., “Racialized Futures: Biologism and the Changing Politics of Identity,” Social Studies of Science 36, no. 3 (2006): 459-488; Winston, C.E. and Kittles, R., “Psychological and Ethical Issues Related to Identity and Inferring Ancestry of African Americans,” in Turner, T., ed., Biological Anthropology and Ethics: From Repatriation to Genetic Identity (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005): at 209-229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurrin, C. et al., “The Smartphone as a Platform for Wearable Cameras in Health Research,” American Journal of Preventitive Medicine 44, no. 3 (2013): 308-313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, A.S. et al., “Using Partially-Observed Facebook Networks to Develop a Peer-Based HIV Prevention Intervention: Case Study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 20, no. 9 (2018): e11652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, N. et al., “Translational Health Disparities Research in a Data-Rich World,” American Journal of Public Health 109, Supp. 1 (2019): S41-S42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Mittelstadt and Floridi, supra note 15.Google Scholar
Garattini, C. et al., “Big Data Analytics, Infectious Diseases and Associated Ethical Impacts,” Philosophy & Technology 32, no. 1 (2019): 69-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Zou, J. and Schiebinger, L., “AI Can Be Sexist and Racist — It’s Time to Make It Fair,” Nature 559, no. 7714 (2018): 324-326; Char, D.S., Shah, N.H., and Magnus, D., “Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care: Addressing Ethical Challenges,” New England Journal of Medicine 378, no. 11 (2018): 981-983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Mittelstadt and Floridi, supra note 15; Docherty, A., “Big Data — Ethical Perspectives,” Anaesthesia 69, no. 4 (2014): 390-391; Choudhury, S. et al., “Big Data, Open Science and the Brain: Lessons Learned from Genomics,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, no. 239 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L., Floridi, L., and van der Sloot, B., Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies (New York: Springer International Publishing, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C.-Lewis et al., “mHealth Technology Use and Implications in Historically Underserved and Minority Populations in the United States: Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Medical Internet Research Mhealth Uhealth 6, no. 6 (2018): e128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, M.S. et al., “Digital Technology Ownership, Usage, and Factors Predicting Downloading Health Apps among Caucasian, Filipino, Korean, and Latino Americans: The Digital Link to Health Survey,” Journal of Medical Internet Research Mhealth Uhealth 2, no. 4 (2014): e43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L., “No Where to Hide? The Ethics and Analytics of Tracking Mobility Using Mobile Phone Data,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34, no. 2 (2016): 319-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Sharp, R.R. and Foster, M.W., “Grappling With Groups: Protecting Collective Interests in Biomedical Research,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32, no. 4 (2007): 321-337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, B.B. et al., “Ethical Issues in Developing Pharmacogenetic Research Partnerships with American Indigenous Communities,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 89, no. 3 (2011): 343-345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijer, C., “Benefit-sharing and Other Protections for Communities in Genetic Research,” Clinical Genetics 58, no. 5 (2000): 367-368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winickoff, E., “Partnership in U.K. Biobank: A Third Way for Genomic Property?” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 3 (2007): 440-456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Sharp and Foster, supra note 30.Google Scholar
Santos, L., “Genetic Research in Native Communities,” Progress in Community Health Partnerships 2, no. 4 (2008): 321-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Taylor, Floridi, and van der Sloot, supra note 26.Google Scholar
Id., at 286.Google Scholar
Koenig, B.A., “Have We Asked Too Much of Consent?” Hastings Center Report 44, no. 4 (2014): 33-34; Vayena, E. and Blasimme, A., “Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance,” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14, no. 4 (2017): 501-513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumder, M.A. et al., “The Role of Participants in a Medical Information Commons,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 51-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Doherty, K.C. et al., “From Consent to Institutions: Designing Adaptive Governance for Genomic Biobanks,” Social Science & Medicine 73, no. 3 (2011): 367-374; Pratt, B. and Hyder, A.A., “Governance of Transnational Global Health Research Consortia and Health Equity,” American Journal of Bioethics 16, no. 10 (2016): 29-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juengst, E.T. and Meslin, E.M., “Sharing with Strangers: Governance Models for Borderless Genomic Research in a Territorial World,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 29, no. 1 (2019): 67-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, J. et al., “Ethics Considerations in Global Mobile Phone-Based Surveys of Noncommunicable Diseases: A Conceptual Exploration,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, no. 5 (2017): e110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. and Honneth, A., Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange (London and New York: Verso, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar