Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:59:32.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disease Stigma in U.S. Public Health Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Scott Burris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stigma has become an important concept in public health law. It is widely accepted that certain diseases are disfavored in society, leading to discrimination against people identified with them, which in turn has the tendency to drive an epidemic underground—i.e., to make it more difficult for voluntary public health programs to reach and succeed among populations bent on concealing their disease or risk status. The need to reduce stigma and its effects has been used to justify the passage of privacy and antidiscrimination law to protect people with HIV. More recently, stigma has been part of the arsenal of justification for special genetic antidiscrimination and privacy law. Despite its importance, however, there is no single widely accepted definition of stigma in social science, and its relationship to law has been generally under-theorized and unsupported by data, reducing our ability to effectively deploy law and other tools in the anti-stigma cause.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Summer 2002 , pp. 179 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

This article is based on a paper presented at Stigma and Global Health: Developing a Research Agenda, a conference convened by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, September 5–7, 2001, and at Health, Law and Human Rights: Exploring the Connections, a conference honoring Jonathan Mann sponsored by Temple University, the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, and others, Philadelphia, September 29–October 1, 2001. I am grateful to the organizers of the NIH conference for the opportunity to participate; to Willo Pequinat and Ellen Stover of the National Institute of Mental Health Office on AIDS, Elizabeth Cooper of Fordham Law School, and Zita Lazzarini of the University of Connecticut for discussions that guided and enriched my thinking; and to Temple law student Annemarie Bridy, Ph.D., for research assistance and advice.Google Scholar
Goffman, E., Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1963).Google Scholar
Id. at 7.Google Scholar
Id. at 5.Google Scholar
Herek, G.M. Capitano, J.P., “AIDS Stigma and Sexual Prejudice,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1126–43, at 1130;. Herek, G.M. Capitano, J.P., “AIDS-Related Stigma and Attitudes Toward Injecting Drug Users Among Black and White Americans,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1144–57, at 1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J.B. Reeder, G.D. Landau, S., “A Social-Psychological Analysis of HIV-Related Stigma: A Two-Factor Theory,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1193–1211, at 1201–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
E.g., Scambler, G., Epilepsy (London: Routledge, 1989); Herek, G.M.et al., “Illness, Stigma and AIDS,” in Costa, P.T. Jr. VandenBos, G.R., eds., Psychological Aspects of Serious Illness: Chronic Conditions, Fatal Diseases and Clinical Care (Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1990): 103–50, at 107.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Devine, P.G. Plant, E.A. Harrison, K., “The Problem of ‘Us’ Versus ‘Them’ and AIDS Stigma,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1212–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
E.g., Siegel, K.et al., “The Motives of Gay Men for Taking or Not Taking the HIV Antibody Test,” Social Problems, 36(1989): 368–83; Sontag, S., Illness as Metaphor (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1978);. Klitzman, R., Being Positive: The Lives of Men and Women (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1997); Derlega, VJ Barbee, A., eds., HIV & Social Interaction (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1998); Zierler, S.et al., “Violence Victimization after HIV Infection in a U.S. Probability Sample of Adult Patients in Primary Care,” American Journal of Public Health, 90 (2000): 208–15; Koenig, L.J.et al., “Violence During Pregnancy Among Women with or at Risk of HIV Infection,” American Journal of Public Health, 92 (2002): 367–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, B.G. Phelan, J.C., “On Stigma and its Public Health Implications.” Paper presented at Stigma and Global Health: Developing a Research Agenda, a conference convened by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, September 5–7, 2001, available at <http://www.stigmaconference.nih.gov/LinkPaper.htm> (emphasis added).Google Scholar
Scambler, , supra note 7, at 41.Google Scholar
Id. On attitudes toward HIV, see generally Herek, G.M. Capitanio, J. Widaman, K., “HIV-Related Stigma and Knowledge in the United States: Prevalence and Trends, 1991–1999,” American Journal of Public Health, 92 (2002): 371–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scambler, , supra note 7, at 57, 114.Google Scholar
Goffman, , supra note 2, at 5. Cf. Krieger, N., “Discrimination and Health,” in Berkman, L. Kawachi, I., eds., Social Epidemiology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000): 36–75 (describing ideology of discrimination).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Scambler, G., “Stigma and Disease: Changing Paradigms,” Lancet, 352 (September 26, 1998): 1054–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, S. Gostin, L. Tress, D., “Public Health Surveillance of Genetic Information: Ethical and Legal Responses to Social Risk,” in Khoury, M. Burke, W. Thomson, E., eds., Genetics and Public Health in the 21st Century: Using Genetic Information to Improve Health and Prevent Disease (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000): 527–48; Burris, S., “Law and the Social Risk of Health Care: Lessons from HIV Testing,” Albany Law Review, 61 (1998): 831–95. See also Cooper, E., “Social Risk and the Transformation of Public Health Law: Lessons from the Plague Years,” Iowa Law Review, 86 (2001): 869–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdiserri, R., “HIV/AIDS Stigma: An Impediment to Public Health,” American Journal of Public Health, 92 (2002): 341–42; School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987); Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Sciences, Assessing Genetic Risks: Implications for Health and Social Policy (Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1994); Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Sciences, Confronting AIDS: Directions for Public Health Care and Research (Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
E.g., Mays, V.M. Cochran, S.D., “Mental Health Correlates of Perceived Discrimination among Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Adults in the United States,” American Journal of Public Health, 91 (2001): 1869–76;.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herek, G.M. Glunt, E. K., “Identity and Community among Gay and Bisexual Men in the AIDS Era: Preliminary Findings from the Sacramento Men's Health Study,” in Herek, G.M. Greene, B., eds., AIDS, Identity, and Community: The HIV Epidemic and Lesbians and Gay Men (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1995): 55–84;.Google Scholar
Marks, G. Burris, S. Peterman, T., “Reducing Sexual Transmission of HIV from Those Who Know They Are Infected: The Need for Personal and Collective Responsibility,” AIDS, 13 (1999): 297–306;.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, J.P., “Homophobia, Self-Esteem, and Risk for HIV among African American Men Who Have Sex with Men,” AIDS Education & Prevention, 10 (1998): 278–92.Google Scholar
Burris, , supra note 17.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Sutton v. United Airlines, 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (holding that courts should consider mitigating devices in determining whether or not an individual is disabled within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA))Google Scholar
Murphy v. United Parcel Service, 527 U.S. 516 (1999) (holding that medication of a medical condition can mitigate an individual's “substantial limitation” of a major life activity, thereby precluding him from being disabled under the ADA)Google Scholar
Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 527 U.S. 555 (1999) (holding that monocular vision is not a per se disability and must be proven on a case-by-case basis).Google Scholar
For a general critique of judicial interpretation of the ADA by the courts, see Diller, M., “Judicial Backlash, the ADA and the Civil Rights Model,” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 21 (2000): 19–52.Google Scholar
For an empirical study of the implementation of the ADA by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and state fair employment practices agencies, see Moss, K.et al., “Unfounded Mandate: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,” Kansas Law Review, 50 (2001): 1–110.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Devine, Plant, Harrison, , supra note 8;.Google Scholar
McAdams, R., “Cooperation and Conflict: The Economics of Group Status Production and Race Discrimination,” Harvard Law Review, 108 (1995): 1003–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, D. Swim, J.K., “Stigma: An Insider's View,” Journal of Social Issues, 57 (2001): 1–14, at 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, R.H., “An Attitudinal Theory of Expressive Law,” Oregon Law Review, 79 (2000): 339–90, at 340–41.Google Scholar
On norms in law and legal scholarship, see Etzioni, A., “Social Norms: Internalization, Persuasion, and History,” Law and Society Review, 34 (2000): 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, S., “Education to Reduce the Spread of HIV,” in Burris, S. Dalton, H.L. Miller, J.L., eds., AIDS Law Today: A New Guide for the Public (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993): 82–114;.Google Scholar
Burris, S., “Surveillance, Social Risk, and Symbolism: Framing the Analysis for Research and Policy,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 25, suppl. 2 (2000): S120–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, A., “The Rights Revolution and Support Structures for Rights Advocacy,” Law & Society Review, 34 (2000): 1203–19;.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, M.W., “How Does Law Matter for Social Movements,” in Garth, B.G. Sarat, A., eds., How Does Law Matter (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1998): At 108.Google Scholar
Pryor, Reeder, Landau, , supra note 6, at 1201–05.Google Scholar
Gusfield, J.R., Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963).Google Scholar
See Kahan, D.M., “The Secret Ambition of Deterrence,” Harvard Law Review, 113 (1999): 413–97, at 436–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, , supra note 24, at 385 n. 115.Google Scholar
Ewick, P. Silbey, S.S., The Common Place of Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998): at 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id. at 20.Google Scholar
Scambler, , supra note 16Google Scholar
Oyserman, Swim, , supra note 23.Google Scholar
Gostin, L. Hodge, J., “The ‘Names Debate’: The Case for National HIV Reporting in the United States,” Albany Law Review, 61 (1998): 679–743Google Scholar
Burris, , “Surveillance, Social Risk, and Symbolism: Framing the Analysis for Research and Policy,” supra note 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, D.M. Munger, F.W., “Rights, Remembrance and the Reconciliation of Difference.” Law & Society Review, 30 (1996): 7–53, at 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, , supra note 17Google Scholar
Scambler, , supra note 7.Google Scholar
Slovic, P.et al., “Facts Versus Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk,” in Kahneman, D. Tversky, A. Slovic, P., eds., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982);.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. Kahneman, D., “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,” in Kahneman, D. Tversky, A. Slovic, P., eds., id. at 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, , supra note 17.Google Scholar
Engel, Munger, , supra note 33, at 14–15.Google Scholar
Id. at 44.Google Scholar
See Etzioni, , supra note 24.Google Scholar
Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 678 (1962) (Douglas, J., concurring).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Article II, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in United Nations Treaty Series, 999, no. 14668 (1976): At 171.Google Scholar
Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 101–02 (1958).Google Scholar
Mann, J., “Medicine and Public Health, Ethics and Human Rights,” in Mann, J.et al., eds., Health and Human Rights: A Reader (New York: Routledge, 1999): 439–52, at 449.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar