Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:35:10.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Currents in Contemporary Bioethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Mark A. Rothstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
JLME Column
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , Summer 2012 , pp. 394 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hsiao, C. J. Beatty, P. C. Hing, E. S. Socey, T. C. Sci, M. A., “Electronic Health Record Systems and Intent to Apply for Meaningful Use Incentives Among Office-Based Physician Practices: United States, 2001–2011,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db79.htm> (last visited April 30, 2012).+(last+visited+April+30,+2012).>Google Scholar
Blumenthal, D. Tavenner, M., “The ‘Meaningful Use’ Regulation for Electronic Health Records,” New England Journal of Medicine 363, no. 6 (2010): 501–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, M. A., “The Hippocratic Bargain and Health Information Technology,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38, no. 1 (2010): 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Letter to Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Recommendations Regarding Sensitive Health Information (November 10, 2010), available at <www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/101110lt.pdf> (last accessed April 30, 2012).+(last+accessed+April+30,+2012).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Letter to Secretary Michael O. Leavitt on Individual Control of Sensitive Health Information Accessible Via the Nationwide Health Information Network for Purposes of Treatment (February 20, 2008), available at <www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/080220lt.pdf> (last visited April 23, 2012).+(last+visited+April+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
See generally Francis, L. P., “Skeletons in the Family Medical Closet: Access of Personal Representatives to Interoperable Medical Records,” St. Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy 4, no. 2 (2011): 371–395.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. Parts 160, 164 (2011).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.506 (2011).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.508(a)(2) (2011).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.502(b)(1) (2011).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.501 (2011) (definition of health care operations).Google Scholar
See National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Report to Secretary Michael O. Leavitt on Enhanced Protections for Uses of Health Data: A Stewardship Framework for “Secondary Uses” of Electronically Collected and Transmitted Health Data (December 19, 2007), available at <www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/071221lt.pdf> (last visited April 23, 2012).+(last+visited+April+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.512 (2011).Google Scholar
Rothstein, M. A. Talbott, M. K., “Compelled Authorizations for Disclosure of Health Records: Magnitude and Implications,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 3 (2007): 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, M. A. Talbott, M. K., “Compelled Disclosure of Health Information: Protecting Against the Greatest Potential Threat to Privacy,” JAMA 295, no. 24 (2006): 2882–2885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 U.S.C. §§ 12101–12216 (2010).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 12 112(d)(2) (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(4) (2010).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(3) (2010).Google Scholar
See Rothstein, Talbott, , supra note 15.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §§ 2000f-2000f-11 (2010). See Rothstein, M. A., “GINA, the ADA, and Genetic Discrimination in Employment,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 4 (2008): 837–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
It is not clear how employers can limit such disclosures with either paper or electronic health records.Google Scholar
It is arguable that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has the authority to make this change through the issuance of regulations.Google Scholar
See Rothstein, Talbott, , supra note 15.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 2000f-1(4)(A)(iii) (2010).Google Scholar
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Letter to Secretary Michael O. Leavitt on Privacy and Confidentiality in the Nationwide Health Information Network (June 22, 2006), available at <www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/060622lt.htm> (last visited April 23, 2012).+(last+visited+April+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
See Rothstein, M. A., “Predictive Genetic Testing for Alzheimer's Disease in Long-Term Care Insurance,” Georgia Law Review 35, no. 3 (2001): 707–733.Google Scholar
See California Healthcare Foundation, Consumers and Health Information Technology: A National Survey, at 25 (2010), available at <www.chcf.org/publications/2010/04/consumers-and-health-information-technology-a-nationalsurvey> (last visited April 30, 2012) (finding that 15% of adults report they would hide something from their physician if they knew their information would be shared and another 33% said they would consider hiding information).+(last+visited+April+30,+2012)+(finding+that+15%+of+adults+report+they+would+hide+something+from+their+physician+if+they+knew+their+information+would+be+shared+and+another+33%+said+they+would+consider+hiding+information).>Google Scholar