Commentary: What “Community Review” Can and Cannot Do

Eric T. Juengst

doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00316.x

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Rothstein, Mark A. and Epps, Phyllis Griffin 2001. Ethical and legal implications of pharmacogenomics . Nature Reviews Genetics, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, p. 228.

Anderlik, Mary R. and Rothstein, Mark A. 2001. Privacy and Confidentiality of Genetic Information: What Rules for the New Science?. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 401.

Marshall, Patricia A. and Rotimi, Charles 2001. Ethical Challenges in Community-Based Research. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Vol. 322, Issue. 5, p. 241.

Rothstein, Mark A. 2002. The Role of IRBs in Research Involving Commerical Biobanks. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 105.

Kuczewski, Mark G. and Marshall, Patricia 2002. The Decision Dynamics of Clinical Research. Medical Care, Vol. 40, Issue. Supplement, p. V.

2003. The International HapMap Project. Nature, Vol. 426, Issue. 6968, p. 789.

Godard, B. Marshall, J. Laberge, C. and Knoppers, B. M. 2004. Strategies for consulting with the community: The cases of four large-scale genetic databases. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 457.

2004. Integrating ethics and science in the International HapMap Project. Nature Reviews Genetics, Vol. 5, Issue. 6, p. 467.

Miller, Paul Steven Apse, Kira Gollust, Sarah Fuller, Barbara and Biesecker, Barbara 2005. Community Involvement in Developing Policies for Genetic Testing: Assessing the Interests and Experiences of Individuals Affected by Genetic Conditions. SSRN Electronic Journal,

Gollust, Sarah E. Apse, Kira Fuller, Barbara P. Miller, Paul Steven and Biesecker, Barbara B. 2005. Community Involvement in Developing Policies for Genetic Testing: Assessing the Interests and Experiences of Individuals Affected by Genetic Conditions. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, Issue. 1, p. 35.

REDDY, DEEPA S. 2007. GOOD GIFTS FOR THE COMMON GOOD: Blood and Bioethics in the Market of Genetic Research. Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 429.

Sapienza, Jessica N. Corbie-Smith, Giselle Keim, Sarah and Fleischman, Alan R. 2007. Community Engagement in Epidemiological Research. Ambulatory Pediatrics, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 247.

McGregor, Joan L. 2007. Population Genomics and Research Ethics with Socially Identifiable Groups. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 356.

Artizzu, Federica 2008. The informed consent aftermath of the genetic revolution. An Italian example of implementation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 181.

Henderson, Gail E. 2008. Introducing Social and Ethical Perspectives on Gene—Environment Research. Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 251.

Hofmann, Bjørn Solbakk, Jan Helge and Holm, Søren 2009. The Ethics of Research Biobanking. p. 3.

O’Doherty, Kieran C. Burgess, Michael M. Edwards, Kelly Gallagher, Richard P. Hawkins, Alice K. Kaye, Jane McCaffrey, Veronica and Winickoff, David E. 2011. From consent to institutions: Designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 73, Issue. 3, p. 367.

Merriman, Ben and Molina, Santiago J. 2015. Variable conceptions of population in community resource genetic projects: a challenge for governance. New Genetics and Society, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 294.

Hayward, Ashley Sjoblom, Erynne Sinclair, Stephanie and Cidro, Jaime 2021. A New Era of Indigenous Research: Community-based Indigenous Research Ethics Protocols in Canada. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 403.

Article contents

Commentary: What “Community Review” Can and Cannot Do

Abstract

Access options

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

Commentary: What “Community Review” Can and Cannot Do

Abstract

Access options

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests