No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Commentary: The Public and the Profession: Meeting at the Right Place
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Extract
Spielman’s taxonomy of collective decision making about medical futility is timely and insightful. Her conclusion, that laws are the best reflection we have of collective values, may be accurate. However, a closer look at the six alternatives for collective decisions is necessary before we rely too heavily on the legislature.
The first two alternatives, decisions by professional organizations and by health care facilities, smack of paternalism. Spielman suggests that statements from professional organizations or health care facilities express professional values and lack adequate input from the public. Could it be that some of these statements in fact may be the best reflections of public attitudes?
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1994
References
Murphy, D.J., Povar, G.J., Pawlson, L.G., “Setting Limits in Clinical Medicine,” Arch. Intern. Med., 154 (1994): 505–12.Google Scholar
Murphy, D.J., Barbour, E., GUIDe (Guidelines for the Use of Intensive Care in Denver): A Community Effort to Define Futile and Inappropriate Care (Anaheim: New Horizons/Society of Critical Care Medicine, 1994).Google ScholarPubMed
Mary Estill Buchanan, personal communication, May 18, 1994.Google Scholar
Kapp, M.B., “Futile Medical Treatment: A Review of the Ethical Arguments and Legal Holdings,” J. Gen. Intern. Med., 9 (1994): 170–77.Google Scholar
Annas, G.J., “Asking the Courts to Set the Standard of Care—The Case of Baby K,” N. Engl. J. Med., 330 (1994): 1542–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar