For example, Contreras, Joseph Mabry, Marcus, “On Scent, in the Hot Zone,” Newsweek, May 29, 1995, at 49.Google Scholar

Preston, Robert, The Hot Zone (New York: Random House, 1994).Google Scholar

Best Seller List, New York Times Book Review, June 25, 1995, at 30.Google Scholar

Klady, Leonard, “Bug Won't Budge from No. 1 Spot,” Variety, Apr. 3–10, 1995, at 14.Google Scholar

Hiltbrand, David, “Tube,” People, 43, no. 18 (1995): 19.Google Scholar

Garrett, Laurie, The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance (New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1994): At 604–09.Google Scholar

Id. at 620.Google Scholar

Parker, Leroy Worthington, Robert H., The Law of Public Health and Safety and the Powers and Duties of Boards of Health (Albany: Mathew Bender, 1892).Google Scholar

Id. at xl, 1–3; and Parmet, Wendy E., “From Slaughter-House to Lochner: The Rise and Fall of the Constitutionalization of Public Health,” American Journal of Legal History, (1996): Forthcoming.Google Scholar

West Virginia v. Dent, 129 U.S. 114 (1889).Google Scholar

Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873).Google Scholar

Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U.S. 678 (1888).Google Scholar

Parmet, Wendy E., “Legal Rights and Communicable Disease: AIDS, the Police Power, and Individual Liberty,” Journal of Health, Politics, Policy and Law, 14 (1989): 741–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For other similar calls, see Burris, Scott, “Thoughts on the Law and the Public's Health,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 22 (1994): 141–47; and Gostin, Lawrence O., “The Resurgent Tuberculosis Epidemic in the Era of AIDS: Reflections on Public Health, Law, and Society,” Maryland Law Review, 54, no. 1 (1995): At 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Parmet, , supra note 13, at 757–62.Google Scholar

See Burris, , supra note 14, at 143.Google Scholar

See Garrett, , supra note 6, at 220.Google Scholar

Id. at 506.Google Scholar

Id. at 459–75.Google Scholar

Id. at 457.Google Scholar

Id. at 517.Google Scholar

Id. 519.Google Scholar

Id. at 472.Google Scholar

8 U.S.C. 1182 (1994).Google Scholar

For example, Carlon, Cynthia A., “Will Our Legal System Guard Our Health and Will the ADA Hamper Our Control Efforts,” Journal of Legal Medicine, 13 (1992): 563–87; and Pardo, Jason A., “Excluding Immigrants on the Basis of Health: The Haitian Centers Council Decision Criticized,” Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 11, no. 2 (1995): 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayer argues that it was fear of discrimination that led public health officials to reject “traditional” public health devices and to opt for an “exceptional” noncoercive response to the HIV epidemic. See Bayer, Ronald, “Commentary—Rethinking Aspects of AIDS Policy,” Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 11, no. 2 (1995): 457–72. While Bayer does not advocate the use of coercive measures in response to HIV, indeed he argues that they would be counterproductive, he is critical of HIV exceptionalism. See also Bayer, Ronald, “Public Health Policy and the AIDS Epidemic: An End to AIDS Exceptionalism,” N. Engl. J. Med., 324 (1991): 1500–04.Google Scholar