Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T07:05:39.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Challenge of Incidental Findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Susan M. Wolf
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , Summer 2008 , pp. 216 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006).Google Scholar
See Vernooij, M. W. et al, “Incidental Findings on Brain MRI in the General Population,” N. Engl. J. Med. 357, no. 18 (2007): 1821–1828; Kumra, S. et al, “Ethical and Practical Considerations in the Management of Incidental Findings in Pediatric MRI Studies,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 45, no. 8 (2006): 1000–1006, at 1002; Alphs, H. H. et al, “Findings on Brain MRI from Research Studies of Occupational Exposure to Known Neurotoxicants,” American Journal of Roentgenology 187, no. 4 (2006): 1043–1047, at 1044; see also Katzman, G. L., Dagher, A. P., and Patronas, N. J., “Incidental Findings on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging from 1000 Asymptomatic Volunteers,” JAMA 282, no. 1 (1999): 36–39; Kim, B. S. et al, “Incidental Findings on Pediatric MR Images of the Brain,” American Journal of Neuroradiology 23, no. 10 (2002): 1674–1677; Illes, J. et al, “Ethical Consideration of Incidental Findings on Adult Brain MRI in Research,” Neurology 62, no. 6 (2004): 888–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Gluecker, T. M. et al, “Extracolonic Findings at CT Colonography: Evaluation of Prevalence and Cost in a Screening Population,” Gastroenterology 124, no. 4 (2003): 911–916; Hara, A. K. et al, “Incidental Extracolonic Findings at CT Colonography,” Radiology 215, no. 2 (2000): 353–357; Yee, J. et al, “Extracolonic Abnormalities Discovered Incidentally at CT Colonography in a Male Population,” Radiology 236, no. 2 (2005): 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Hellstrom, M. et al, “Extracolonic and Incidental Findings on CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy),” American Journal of Roentgenology 182, no. 3 (2004): 631–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucassen, A. and Parker, M., “Revealing False Paternity: Some Ethical Considerations,” The Lancet 357 (2001): 1033–1035, at 1035; McEwen, J. E., “Genetic Information, Ethics, and Information Relating to Biological Parenthood,” in Murray, T. H. and Mehlman, M. J., eds., Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal, and Policy Issues in Biotechnology, vol. 1 (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000): 356–363, at 359–360.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. Part 46 (2008).Google Scholar
See Lawrenz, F. and Sobotka, S., “Empirical Analysis of Current Approaches to Incidental Findings,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 2 (2008): 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar