Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T16:51:21.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Boundaries of “Good Behavior” and Judicial Competence: Exploring Responsibilities and Authority Limitations of Cognitive Specialists in the Regulation of Incapacitated Judges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Rebecca Weintraub Brendel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Independent Articles: Commentary
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 46 , Issue 2: Law and the Opioid Crisis: An Inter-Disciplinary Examination , Summer 2018 , pp. 521 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brendel, R. Weintraub et al., “An Approach to Selected Legal Issues: Confidentiality, Mandatory Reporting, Abuse and Neglect, Informed Consent, Capacity Decisions, Boundary Issues, and Malpractice Claims,” Medical Clinics of North America 94, no. 6 (2010): 1229-1240.Google Scholar
Wettstein, R.M., “Fitness-for-Duty Evaluations,” in Clinical Guide to Mental Disability Evaluations, eds. Gold, L. and Vanderpool, D. (New York: Springer, 2013), 309-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Dementia and Democracy,” lecture, Harvard Law School, November 15, 2017, available at <http://clbb.mgh.harvard.edu/dementiaanddemocracy/> (last accessed May 12, 2018).+(last+accessed+May+12,+2018).>Google Scholar