Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:44:00.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biobanking and Privacy Law in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Sueli Gandolfi Dallari ,
Felipe Angel Bocchi Castellaro  and
Iara Coelho Zito Guerriero
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent scientific and technological developments have promoted the emergence of biobanks on a population scale. Although the storage of human biological material has taken place for a long time, it is only recently that biobanks have acquired a broader scientific significance, especially for genomic research. The increase in biobanks creates many ethical dilemmas, such as the protection of privacy, and creates the need for a new regulatory framework, which must enable the sustainable development of biobanks while also protecting the rights of research subjects and biobank participants.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , Winter 2015 , pp. 714 - 725
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, “População,” available at <http://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/populacao/projecao/> (last visited October 16, 2015).+(last+visited+October+16,+2015).>Google Scholar
The World Bank, “Data,” available at <http://data.worldbank.org/country/brazil> (last visited October 16, 2015).+(last+visited+October+16,+2015).>Google Scholar
Cambon-Thomsen, A., “The Social and Ethical Issues of Post-Genomic Human Biobanks,” Nature Reviews Genetics 5, no. 11 (2004): 866–873 [hereinafter cited as Cambon-Thomsen].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marodin, G. Salgueiro, J. B. Motta, M. L. et al. , “Diretrizes nacionais para biorrepositório e biobanco de material biológico humano,” Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira 59, no. 1 (2013): 72–77.Google Scholar
Brazilian Law n. 11.105, March 24, 2005.Google Scholar
Brazilian Law n. 9.434, February 4, 1997.Google Scholar
Brazil Ministry of Health, Ordinance 2.201 – National Guidelines for Biorepository and Biobank of Human Biological Material for Research Purpose (2011), available at <http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2011/prt2201_14_09_2011.html> (last visited October 16, 2015).+(last+visited+October+16,+2015).>Google Scholar
Pereira, A. C. Bensenor, I. M. Fedeli, L. M. et al. , “Delineamento e implementação do biobanco do ELSA-Brasil: Estudo prospectivo na população brasileira,” Revista de Saúde Pública 47, no. 2 (2013): 72–78.Google Scholar
Brazilian Constitution, 5 October 1988 as amended 4 June 1998.Google Scholar
Brazilian Law n. 10.406, January 10, 2002.Google Scholar
Brazilian Law n. 9.279, May 14, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazilian Law n. 10.205, March 10, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil National Health Council, Resolution CNS 466/12 –Guidelines and Regulatory Standards for Research Involving Human Beings (2012), available at <http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf> (last visited October 16, 2015).+(last+visited+October+16,+2015).>Google Scholar
Brazil National Health Council, Resolution 196/96 – Guidelines and Regulatory Standards for Research Involving Human Beings (1996), available at <http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/1996/Res196_en.pdf> (last visited October 16, 2015).+(last+visited+October+16,+2015).>Google Scholar
Knoppers, B. M. Abdul-Rahman, M. H. Bédard, K., “Genomic Databases and International Collaboration,” King's Law Journal 18, no. 2 (2007): 291–312.Google Scholar
Brazil National Health Council, Resolution 340/04 – Guidelines for Ethical Analysis and Processing of Research Projects on Human Genetics (2004), available at <http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2004/reso340.doc> (last visited October 16, 2015).+(last+visited+October+16,+2015).>Google Scholar
The CEPs (Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa) are equivalent to the American Institutional Review Boards (IRB) and the Canadian Research Ethics Boards (REB). To the purposes of this paper, the CEPs will be named as Institutional Review Boards.Google Scholar
Brazil National Health Council, Resolution 441/11 – Brazilian Resolution on the Storage and Use of Human Biological Material in Research Projects, 2011, available at <http://conselho.saude.gov.br/web_comissoes/conep/aquivos/resolucoes/resolucoes.htm> (last visited November 10, 2015).+(last+visited+November+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
Brazil National Health Council, Resolution 347/05 – Guidelines for Ethical Analyzing of Research projects That Involve Material Storage or Utilization of Stored Materials in Prior Researches (2005), available at <http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2005/Res347_en.pdf> (last visited October 16, 2015).+(last+visited+October+16,+2015).>Google Scholar
Knoppers, B. M. Abdul-Rahman, M. H., “Chapter 2: Biobanks in the Literature,” in Elger, B. Biller-Andorno, N. Mauron, A. et al. , eds., Ethical Issues in Governing Biobanks (Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Law 14/2007 on Biomedical Research, July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
Hansson, M. G., “Ethics and Biobanks,” British Journal of Cancer 100, no. 1 (2009): 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, E. W. Ross, L. F., “Implications of Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research,” JAMA 295, no. 1 (2006): 37–38.Google Scholar
Sharp, R. R. Foster, M. W., “Clinical Utility and Full Disclosure of Genetic Results to Research Participants,” American Journal of Bioethics 6, no. 6 (2006): 42–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Cambon-Thonsem, , supra note 3.Google Scholar
Marodin, G. França, P. H. Salgueiro, J. B. et al. , “Alternatives of Informed Consent for Storage and Use of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: Brazilian Regulation,” Developing World Bioethics 14, no. 3 (2014): 127–131 [hereinafter cited as Marodin 2014].Google Scholar
Marodin, G. França, P. Rocha, J. C. et al. , “Biobanking for Health Research in Brazil: Present Challenges and Future Directions,” Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública 31, no. 6 (2012): 523–528 [hereinafter cited as Marodin 2012].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, S. M. Lawrenz, F. P. Nelson, C. A. et al. , “Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 2 (2008): 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arribas, M. C. M. Díaz, J. A., “Biobancos y Utilización de Muestras de Origen Humano en Investigación Quirúrgica. Marco Normativo Actual,” Cirurgía Española, 89 no. 4 (2011): 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, A. L. Beskow, L. M., “Informed Consent in Genomics and Genetic Research,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 22, no. 11 (2010): 361–381 [hereinafter cited as McGuire].Google Scholar
Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990).Google Scholar
Washington University v. Catalona, 490 F.3d 667 (8th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1166 (2008).Google Scholar
See Cambon-Thonsem, , supra note 3.Google Scholar
Hansson, M. G. Dillner, J. Bartram, C. R. et al. , “Should Donors Be Allowed to Give Broad Consent to Future Biobank Research?” Lancet Oncology 7, no. 3 (2006): 266–269.Google Scholar
See Marodin, 2012, supra note 27.Google Scholar
See McGuire, , supra note 30.Google Scholar
De Faria, P. L. De Campos, A. P., “A Nova Lei sobre Informação de Saúde, Informação Genética e Biobancos – Guia das Disposições mais Importantes,” Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 23, no. 1 (2005): 97–112.Google Scholar
Public Law 110–233, 122 Stat.881 (2008).Google Scholar
See McGuire, , supra note 30.Google Scholar
See Marodin, 2014, supra note 26.Google Scholar
O'Doherty, K. C. Burgess, M. M. Edwards, K. et al. , “From Consent to Institutions: Designing Adaptive Governance for Genomic Biobanks,” Social Science and Medicine 73, no. 3 (2011): 367–374.Google Scholar
Brazil National Health Council, Resolution 446/11 – Guidelines for Composition of National Commission on Research Ethics (CONEP) (2011), available at <http://conselho.saude.gov.br/web_comissoes/conep/aquivos/resolucoes/resolucoes.htm> (last visited November 11, 2015)+(last+visited+November+11,+2015)>Google Scholar
Brazil National Health Council, Resolution 370/07 – Guidelines for Registration of CEPs (2007), available at <http://conselho.saude.gov.br/web_comissoes/conep/aquivos/resolucoes/resolucoes.htm> (last visited October 16, 2015).+(last+visited+October+16,+2015).>Google Scholar