Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:12:39.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Administrative Law and the Public's Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Eleanor D. Kinney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Today, public health regulation at all levels faces unprecedented challenges both at home and abroad. The September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, D.C., by the Al Qaeda terrorist network and the anthrax bioterrorism that followed shortly thereafter have put public health regulation at the forefront of homeland security. The anthrax scare, in particular, has greatly tested the American public health system, calling into question whether the United States and its component states and localities are prepared to handle a major outbreak of infectious disease, such as smallpox, in a future bioterrorist action. While the response of public health agencies was commendable, especially in light of the magnitude of the assaults, it is manifestly clear that the American public health system will be hard pressed to meet similar challenges that may lie ahead.

The events of fall 2001 follow a period of major challenges for public health. The AIDS pandemic has killed millions of people throughout the globe, especially in Africa and other parts of the developing world.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Summer 2002 , pp. 212 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities, Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (December 21, 2001), available at <http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA2.pdf>. The Act can also be found on pages 324–348 of this issue.. The Act can also be found on pages 324–348 of this issue.' href=https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2002.tb00401.x>CrossRef. The Act can also be found on pages 324–348 of this issue.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Center+for+Law+and+the+Public's+Health+at+Georgetown+and+Johns+Hopkins+Universities,+Model+State+Emergency+Health+Powers+Act+(December+21,+2001),+available+at+.+The+Act+can+also+be+found+on+pages+324–348+of+this+issue.>Google Scholar
Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities, Model Public Health Laws, at <http://www.publichealthlaw.net/Resources/Modellaws.htm> (last visited May 1, 2002). (last visited May 1, 2002).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Center+for+Law+and+the+Public's+Health+at+Georgetown+and+Johns+Hopkins+Universities,+Model+Public+Health+Laws,+at++(last+visited+May+1,+2002).>Google Scholar
See, e.g., Rosen, G., A History of Public Health, exp. ed. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993);. Porter, D., ed., The History of Public Health and the Modern State (Atlanta: Rodopi B.V., 1994).Google Scholar
Fee, E., “Public Health and the State: The United States,” in Porter, , supra note 3, at 224, 227–28.Google Scholar
See Tobey, J.A., Public Health Law: A Manual for Sanitarians (Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co., 1926): at 11;. Parker, L. Worthington, R.H., Public Health Safety and the Powers and Duties of Boards of Health (Albany: Matthew Bender, 1892).Google Scholar
See Jost, T.S., ed., Regulation in the Health Care Professions (Chicago: Health Administration Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Mullan, F., Plagues and Politics: The Story of the United States Public Health Service (New York: Basic Books, 1989): at 14–57. See also Duffy, J., The Sanitarians: A History of American Public Health (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1990).Google Scholar
See Parmet, W.E., “Health Care and the Constitution: Public Health and the Role of the State in the Framing Era,” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 20 (1992): 267–335.Google Scholar
An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen, Pub. L. No. 77, 1 Stat. 605 (1798) (repealed).Google Scholar
See Parker, Worthington, , supra note 5, at 82–85.Google Scholar
U.S. Public Health Service, The Virtual Office of the Surgeon General, History of the Office of the Surgeon General, at <http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/history/sghist.htm> (last visited April 30, 2002).+(last+visited+April+30,+2002).>Google Scholar
Mullan, , supra note 7, at 20–21.Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Milestones in U.S. Food and Drug Law History (May 3, 1999), at <http://www.fda.gov/opacom/backgrounders/miles.html>..>Google Scholar
Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906, Pub. L. No. 59-384, 34 Stat. 768 (1906) (codified as amended at 21 U.S.C. §§ 1–15 (1934) (repealed by 21 U.S.C. § 329(A)).Google Scholar
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, Pub. L. No. 675, 52 Stat. 1040 (1938) (codified as amended at 21 U.S.C. §§ 301–397 (1994 & Supp. V 1999).Google Scholar
Social Security Act of 1935, Pub. L. No. 74-271, 49 Stat. 620 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 301–1399 (1994 & Supp. V 1999).Google Scholar
Social Security Amendments of 1965, § 102(a), Pub. L. No. 89-97, 79 Stat. 291 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (1994) (Medicare)); id. § 121(a), 79 Stat. 343 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (1994) (Medicaid)).Google Scholar
See Davis, K. Schoen, K., Health and the War on Poverty (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1978).Google Scholar
Ransdell Act, Pub. L. No. 71-25 (1930), 46 Stat. 379 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 21, 22, 23a–23g). See Harden, V.A., A Short History of the National Institutes of Health, at <http://www.nih.gov/od/museun/exhibits/history/full-text.html> (last visited May 7, 2002).+(last+visited+May+7,+2002).>Google Scholar
See Fredrickson, D.S., “Health and the Search for New Knowledge,” in Knowles, J.H., ed., Doing Better and Feeling Worse: Health in the United States (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1977): 159–70.Google Scholar
U.S. Public Health Service, supra note 11.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Major Environmental Laws, at <http://www.epa.gov/epahome/laws.htm> (last visited May 1, 2002).+(last+visited+May+1,+2002).>Google Scholar
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Pub. L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 852 (1970) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4375 (1994 & Supp. V 1999).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, An Agency for the Environment at, <http://www.epa.gov/history/publications/origins6.htm> (last visited May 1, 2002).+(last+visited+May+1,+2002).>Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Act, Pub. L. 91–596, 84 Stat. 1590 (1970) (codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. §§ 651–677 (1994 & Supp. V 1999).Google Scholar
See Fleming, S.H., “OSHA at 30: Three Decades of Progress in Occupational Safety and Health,” Job Safety & Health Quarterly, 12, no. 3 (2001): 23–32, available at <http://www.osha.gov/as/opa/osha-at-30.html>.Google Scholar
Exec. Order No. 12,291, 46 Fed. Reg. 13,193 (1981). See Bruff, H.H., “Presidential Management of Agency Rulemaking,” George Washington Law Review, 57 (1989): 533–95; Symposium, , “Presidential Oversight of Regulatory Decisionmaking,” American University Law Review, 36 (1987): 443–89;. McGarity, T.O., “Regulatory Reform in the Reagan Era,” Maryland Law Review, 45 (1986): 253–73;. Demuth, C.C. Ginsburg, D.H., “White House Review of Agency Rulemaking,” Harvard Law Review, 99 (1986): 1075–88.Google Scholar
Exec. Order No. 12,498, Regulatory Planning Process, 50 Fed. Reg. 1036 (1985).Google Scholar
See Symposium, “The Council on Competitiveness: Executive Oversight of Agency Rulemaking,” Administrative Law Journal of American University, 7 (1983): 297–308.Google Scholar
Exec. Order No. 12,866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 Fed. Reg. 51, 735 (1993).Google Scholar
Asimow, M. Bonfield, A.E. Levin, R.M., State and Federal Administrative Law, 2d ed. (Minneapolis: West Group, 1998): § 7.8, at 492–98.Google Scholar
Population Reference Bureau, 2001 World Population Data Sheet (May 2001), available at <http://geography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site = http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prb.org%2Fpubs%2Fwpds2000%2F>..>Google Scholar
Kinney, E.D., “Administrative Law Issues in Professional Regulation,” in Jost, supra note 6, at 103–28.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 (1975) (addressing the combination of functions problem in ruling that members of a state professional licensure board could adjudicate a violation based on charges developed in its own investigation); Gibson v. Berryhill, 411 U.S. 564 (1973) (establishing a basis of unconstitutional pecuniary bias on the part of a professional licensure board).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 435 U.S. 519 (1978) (clarifying federal rulemaking requirements); Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (establishing the standard for judicial review of agency statutory interpretations); Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) (clarifying standing requirements for citizen suits in environmental statutes).Google Scholar
See Wright, R.F., “The Civil and Criminal Methodologies of the Fourth Amendment” (note), Yale Law Journal, 93 (1984): 1127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Schwartz, B., Administrative Law, 3d. ed. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1991): § 1.1, at 2–3.Google Scholar
See Fox, W.F. Jr., Understanding Administrative Law, 3d ed. (New York: Matthew Bender, 1997): § 13, at 74–82.Google Scholar
Parker, Worthington, , supra note 5, § 73, at 85–86.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine, The Future of Public Health Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1988): at 11.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Gostin, L.O., Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000): at 47–55.Google Scholar
Parker, Worthington, , supra note 5;. Prentice, W.P., Policy Powers Arising Under the Law of Overruling Necessity (New York: Banks & Brothers, 1894);. Freund, E., The Police Power: Public Policy and Constitutional Rights (Chicago: Callaghan & Co., 1904).Google Scholar
See Parmet, W.E., “Legal Rights and Communicable Disease: AIDS, the Police Power, and Individual Liberty,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 14, no. 4 (1989): 741–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id. at 25.Google Scholar
See U.S. Const. art I, § 1.Google Scholar
See id. at art. I, § 8, cl. 1.Google Scholar
See Gostin, L.O., “The Future of Public Health Law,” American Journal of Law & Medicine, 12 (1986): 461–90, at 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Aman, A.C. Jr. Mayton, W.T., Administrative Law, 2d ed. (St. Paul: West Group, 2001): §§ 1.1–1.4, at 9–36.Google Scholar
Parker, Worthington, , supra note 5, § 80, at 90.Google Scholar
U.S. Const. art. I, § 10, cl. 2.Google Scholar
Pierce, R.J. Jr. Shapiro, S.A. Verkuil, P.R.,Administrative Law and Process, 3d ed. (New York: Foundation Press, 1999): § 5.4, at 138–66.Google Scholar
Id. § 5.7, 182–206.Google Scholar
Schwartz, , supra note 37, § 10, at 584–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Model State Administrative Procedure Act § 5–116, 15 U.L.A. 114 (1981); Model State Administrative Procedure Act § 15(g), 15A U.L.A. 11 (1961).Google Scholar
5 U.S.C. § 706(b) (1994).Google Scholar
Pierce, Shapiro, Verkuil, , supra note 54, § 6.3, at 221–75.Google Scholar
North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of Chicago, 211 U.S. 306 (1908); See Aman, Mayton, , supra note 51, § 7.7.2, at 185.Google Scholar
See Parmet, , supra note 45.Google Scholar
See Parmet, W.E., “Tobacco, HIV, and the Courtroom: The Role of Affirmative Litigation in the Formation of Public Health Policy,” Houston Law Review, 36 (1999): 1663–712.Google Scholar
See Parmet, W.E., “From Slaughter-House to Lochner: The Rise and Fall of the Constitutionalization of Public Health,” American Journal of Legal History, 40, no. 4 (1996): 476–505. See also Burris, S., “Rationality Review and the Politics of Public Health,” Villanova Law Review, 34 (1989): 933–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Furrow, B.R., “Governing Science: Public Risks and Private Remedies,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 131 (1983): 1403–67;. Bazelon, D.L., “Coping With Technology Through the Legal Process,” Cornell Law Review, 62 (1977): 817–32;. Kantrowitz, A., “Controlling Technology Democratically,” American Scientist, 63 (1975): 505–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, R.L., “Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective,” Stanford Law Review, 38 (1986): 1189–326.Google Scholar
5 U.S.C. § 553 (1994).Google Scholar
See Symposium, “The Contribution of the D.C. Circuit to Administrative Law,” Administrative Law Review, 40 (1988): 507–59;. Gifford, D.J., “Rulemaking and Rulemaking Review: Struggling Toward a New Paradigm,” Administrative Law Review, 32 (1980): 577–620.Google Scholar
See Williams, S., “Hybrid Rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act: A Legal and Empirical Analysis,” University of Chicago Law Review, 42 (1975): 401–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 435 U.S. 519 (1978). See also United States v. Florida East Coast Railway, 410 U.S. 224 (1973).Google Scholar
See Stewart, R.B., “Vermont Yankee and the Evolution of Administrative Procedure,” Harvard Law Review, 91 (1978): 1805–22;. Scalia, A., “Vermont Yankee: The APA, the D.C. Circuit and the Supreme Court,” Supreme Court Review, (1978): 345–409.Google Scholar
See Smith, L.P., “Judicialization: The Twilight of Administrative Law,” Duke Law Journal (1985): 427–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K.C., “An Approach to Problems of Evidence in the Administrative Process,” Harvard Law Review, 55 (1942): 364–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984).Google Scholar
Asimow, Bonfield, Levin, , supra note 31, § 9.2, at 566.Google Scholar
Id. § 9.2, at 567.Google Scholar
See Sunstein, C.R., “Law and Administration After Chevron,” Columbia Law Review, 90 (1990): 2071–120;. Farina, C.R., “Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State,” Columbia Law Review, 89 (1989): 452–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K.C. Pierce, R.J. Jr., Administrative Law Treatise, 3d ed. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1994): at 112–14.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Litan, R.E. Nordhaus, W.D., Reforming Federal Regulation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983);. Breyer, S., Regulation and Its Reform (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Freeman, J., “Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State,” University of California Los Angeles Law Review, 45 (1997): 1–98; Symposium, : “Private Accreditation in the Regulatory State,” Law & Contemporary Problems, 57 (1994): 1–242;. Michael, D.C., “Federal Agency Use of Audited Self-Regulation as a Regulatory Technique,” Administrative Law Review, 47 (1995): 171–253.Google Scholar
Lyon, T.P. Maxwell, J.W., “‘Voluntary’ Approaches to Environmental Regulation: A Survey,” in Franzini, M. Nicita, A., eds., Economic Institutions and Environmental Policy: Economics: Past, Present and Future (Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate, 2000);. Steinzor, R.I., “Reinventing Environmental Regulation: The Dangerous Journey from Command to Self-Control,” Harvard Environmental Law Review, 22 (1998): 103–202.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Gauging Control Technology and Regulatory Impacts in Occupational Safety and Health — An Appraisal of OSHA's Analytic Approach, OTA-ENV-635 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Gov't Printing Office, 1995).Google Scholar
See Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute, 448 U.S. 607 (1980); American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. Donovan, 452 U.S. 490 (1981).Google Scholar
See McGarity, T.O. Shapiro, S.A., Workers at Risk: The Failed Promise of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1993).Google Scholar
Shapiro, S.A. Rabinowitz, R., “Voluntary Regulatory Compliance in Theory and Practice: The Case of OSHA,” Administrative Law Review, 52 (2000): 97–155.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Ayres, I. Braithwaite, J., Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992);. McGarity, T.O., Reinventing Rationality: The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991);. Bardach, E. Kagan, R.A., Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982);. Baram, M.S.et al., Alternatives to Regulation: Managing Risks to Health, Safety and the Environment (Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1982).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Breyer, S., Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993);. Stern, P.C. Fineberg, H.V., Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Arrow, K.J.et al., “Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?,” Science, 272, no. 5259 (1996): 221–22; Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health, National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Applegate, J.S., “The Perils Of Unreasonable Risk: Information, Regulatory Policy, and Toxic Substances Control,” Columbia Law Review, 91 (1991): 261–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C., The Cost-Benefit State: The Future of Regulatory Protection (Chicago: ABA Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar
Mashaw, J.L., Greed, Chaos, and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997);. Robinson, G.O., American Bureaucracy: Public Choice and Public Law (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991);. Sunstein, C.R., “Interest Groups in American Public Law,” Stanford Law Review, 38 (1985): 29–87;. Stewart, R.B., “The Discontents of Legalism: Interest Group Relations in Administrative Regulation,” Wisconsin Law Review (1985): 655–86.Google Scholar
See Gostin, , supra note 43, at 85–109.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Cooper, E.B., “Social Risk and the Transformation of Public Health Law: Lessons from the Plague Years,” Iowa Law Review, 86 (2001): 869–947;. Nelkin, D., “Communicating Technological Risk: The Social Construction of Risk Perception,” Annual Review of Public Health, 10 (1989): 95–113.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), aff'g 153 F.3d 155 (4th Cir. 1998).Google Scholar
Regulations Restricting the Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco to Protect Children and Adolescents, 61 Fed. Reg. 44,396 (1996) (to be codified at 21 C.F.R. pt. 801).Google Scholar
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. at 161. See Fazioli, J.A., “Chevron up in Smoke?: Tobacco at the Crossroads of Administrative Law,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 22 (1999): 1057–80.Google Scholar
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. at 161.Google Scholar
Boreali v. Axelrod, 517 N.E.2d 1350 (N.Y. 1987).Google Scholar
Calahan, D., ed., Promoting Health Behavior: How Much Freedom? Whose Responsibility? (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2000);. Coughlin, S.S. Beauchamp, T.L., eds., Ethics and Epidemiology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
See Kinney, E.D., “The International Human Right to Health: What Does it Mean for Our Nation and World,” Indiana Law Review, 34 (2001): 1457–75;. Toebes, B., “Toward an Improved Understanding of the International Human Right to Health,” Human Rights Quarterly, 21 (1999): 661–79;. Gostin, L.O. Lazzarini, Z., Human Rights and Public Health in the AIDS Pandemic (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar