Some form of assisted dying is also lawful in Luxembourg, Montana, Washington State, and Colombia. However, there is insufficient evidence to include these jurisdictions in our review.Google Scholar

Given the variation in the legal regimes, not all the headings are used for all the jurisdictions.Google Scholar

On this issue, see Lewis, P., “The Empirical Slippery Slope from Voluntary to Non Voluntary Euthanasia,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 1 (2007): 197–210. The Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel, End-of-Life Decision Making (Ottawa, The Royal Society of Canada, 2011): 63–68; Bartels, L. Otlowski, M., “A Right to Die? Euthanasia and the Law in Australia,” Journal of Law and Medicine 17, no. 4 (2010): 532–555, at 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penal Code (Netherlands) 1881, Arts. 293, 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedures) Act, 2001 [Euthanasia Act (Netherlands) 2001].Google Scholar

Id., at Article 2(1).Google Scholar

Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter Bevordering van de Geneeskunst [Royal Dutch Medical Association] (KNMG), Standpunt Federatiebestuur KNMG inzake euthanasie [Position of the Federal Board of the KNMG concerning euthanasia] (2003): Para 5.1.1 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychiatrie [Dutch Association for Psychiatry] (NVP), Richtlijn omgaan met het verzoek om hulp bij zelfdoding door patiënten met een psychiatrische stoornis [Guideline on requests for assisted suicide by patients with psychiatric disorders] (2009): At para 5.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. Bood, A. Weyers, H., Euthanasia and Law in the Netherlands (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998): At 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Id., at 85–86.Google Scholar

See Euthanasia Act (Netherlands) 2001, supra note 5, at Article 2 (2).Google Scholar

Id., at Article 2(3).Google Scholar

Id., at Article 2(4).Google Scholar

See Euthanasia Act (Belgium) 2002, at Article 3§1.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id., at Article 3§2(1).Google Scholar

Id., at Article 3§4.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id., at Article 4§1.Google Scholar

Id.;. Lewis, P., “Euthanasia in Belgium Five Years after Legalisation,” European Journal of Health Law 16, no. 2 (2009): 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Euthanasia Act (Belgium) 2002, at Article 4§1.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

The Oregon Death With Dignity Act, Oregon Revised Statutes 127.800–127.995 (1999), 127.880 §3.14 states that “[a]ctions taken in accordance with ORS 127.800 to 127.897 shall not, for any purpose, constitute suicide, assisted suicide, mercy killing or homicide, under the law.” Therefore, the term physician assisted dying (PAD) is used to refer to lawful conduct under the DWDA.Google Scholar

Id., at 127.800 §1.01(3).Google Scholar

Id., at 127.840 §3.06.Google Scholar

Id., at 127.840 §3.06.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id., at 127.810 §2.02(1).Google Scholar

Id., at 127.850 §3.08.Google Scholar

Id., at 127.800 §1.01(7).Google Scholar

Id., at 127.830 §3.04.Google Scholar

Id., at 127.845 §3.07.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Penal Code (Switzerland), at Article 115.Google Scholar

Bosshard, G., “Switzerland,” in Griffiths, J. Weyers, H. Adams, M., eds., Euthanasia and Law in Europe (Oxford, Portland (OR): Hart, 2008): At 471–472; Guillod, O. Schmidt, A., “Assisted Suicide under Swiss Law,” European Journal of Health Law 12, no. 1 (2005): 25–38, at 30.Google Scholar

Id., at 31.Google Scholar

Id., at 30.Google Scholar

The term assisted suicide or physician assisted suicide (PAS) is the legally accurate term for facilitated self-killing in The Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland. This usage is relatively unproblematic in Europe.Google Scholar

Loi fédérale sur les stupéfiants et les substances psychotropes du 3 octobre 1951 [Federal Narcotics Act 1951] Loi fédérale sur les médicaments et les dispositifs médicaux du 15 décembre 2000 [Therapeutic Products Act 2000].Google Scholar

See Bosshard, , supra note 37, at 473; Zurich Case Entscheid der 3 Kammer VB Nr 99.00145 (1999) (Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich [Zurich Administrative Court]) Aargau Case Entscheid BE 2003.00354–K3 (2005) (Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Aargau [Aargau Administrative Court]).Google Scholar

Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences, Care of Patients in the End of Life, at para 4.1, available at <http://www.samw.ch/dms/en/Ethics/Guidelines/Currently-valid-guidelines/e_RL_Lebensende.pdf> (last visited October 18, 2013).+(last+visited+October+18,+2013).>Google Scholar

Sobel, J., “Capacité de discernement et demande d'assistance au suicide,” [“Decisional capacity and requests for suicide assistance”] Bioethica Forum 2, no. 1 (2009): 29–30, at 30.Google Scholar

Haas Entscheid 2A.48/2006, 2006 (November 3, 2006) (Schweizerisches Bundesgericht; Haas v Switzerland (2011) 53 EHRR 33 (ECtHR); Black, I., “Suicide Assistance for Mentally Disordered Individuals in Switzerland and the State's Positive Obligation to Facilitate Dignified Suicide: Haas c. Suisse, Cour europeenne des droits de l'homme, 1re section [European Court of Human Rights, 1st Section] (20 janvier 2011) (Unreported),” Medical Law Review 20, no. 1 (2012): 157–166 see Bosshard, , supra note 37, at 473.Google Scholar

Rurup, M. L. Smets, T. Cohen, J. Bilsen, J. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. Deliens, L., “The First Five Years of Euthanasia Legislation in Belgium and The Netherlands: Description and Comparison of Cases,” Palliative Medicine 26, no. 1 (2012): 43–49, at Table 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Wijlick, E. H. J. van Dijk, G., “Zorgvuldige Euthanasie,” [“Careful Euthanasia,” Medisch Contact [Medical Contact] 65, nos. 33/34 (2010): 1612–1615, at 1615.Google Scholar

van der Heide, A. Legemaate, J. Ontwuteaka-Philipsen, B. Bolt, E. Bolt, I. van Delden, H. Geijteman, M. Snijdewind, M. van Tol, D. Willems, D., Tweede evaluatie Wet toetsing levensbeëindiging op verzoek en hulp bij zelfdoding [Second evaluation of the Euthanasia Law] (Den Haag: ZonMW, 2012): Tabel 8.10.Google Scholar

See Rurup, et al., supra note 46, at Table 1.Google Scholar

Chambaere, K. Bilsen, J. Cohen, J. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. Mortier, F. Deliens, L., “Trends in Medical End-of-Life Decision Making in Flanders, Belgium 1998-2001-2007,” Medical Decision Making 31, no. 3 (2011): 500–510, at table 4, table 1; Chambaere, K. Rietjens, J. A. Smets, T. Bilsen, J. Deschepper, R. Pasman, H. R. W. Deliens, L., “Age-Based Disparities in End-of-Life Decisions in Belgium: A Population-Based Death Certificate Survey,” BMC Public Health 12, no. 1 (2012): 447–456, at Table 4 and 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oregon Public Health Division, Fifteenth Annual Report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (2013), at Table 1, available at <http://public.health.oregon.gov/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Documents/year15.pdf> (last visited November 14, 2013). Note that responsibility for monitoring PAD under the DWDA previously vested in the Oregon Department of Human Services, and the Oregon Department of Human Resources (defunct). At the time of writing, all DWDA Annual Reports were available at <http://public.health.oregon.gov/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Pages/ar-index.aspx>. (last visited November 14, 2013). Note that responsibility for monitoring PAD under the DWDA previously vested in the Oregon Department of Human Services, and the Oregon Department of Human Resources (defunct). At the time of writing, all DWDA Annual Reports were available at .' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Oregon+Public+Health+Division,+Fifteenth+Annual+Report+on+Oregon's+Death+with+Dignity+Act+Oregon's+Death+with+Dignity+Act+(2013),+at+Table+1,+available+at++(last+visited+November+14,+2013).+Note+that+responsibility+for+monitoring+PAD+under+the+DWDA+previously+vested+in+the+Oregon+Department+of+Human+Services,+and+the+Oregon+Department+of+Human+Resources+(defunct).+At+the+time+of+writing,+all+DWDA+Annual+Reports+were+available+at+.>Google Scholar

In Switzerland, suicide assistance must be notified as unnatural death to the local police and coroner. There is no national body to which assisted suicides must be reported: Bosshard, G. Ulrich, E. Bar, W., “748 Cases of Suicide Assisted by a Swiss Right-to-Die Organisation,” Swiss Medical Weekly 133, nos. 21–22 (2003): 310–317, at 311. Therefore, no national reporting data is available.Google Scholar

See Rurup, et al., supra note 46, at Table 1.Google Scholar

de Boer, M. E. Droes, R.-M. Jonker, C. Eefsting, J. A. Hertogh, C. M. P. M., “Advance Directives for Euthanasia in Dementia: Do Law-Based Opportunities Lead to More Euthanasia?” Health Policy 98, no. 2–3 (2010): 256–262, at 258: 0.7% (3/454) respondent geriatricians in nursing homes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See, for example, Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2012 [Annual Report 2012] (2013), casus 4.Google Scholar

The judgment is published on the RRCs' website <http://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl> 60–69 jarig vrouw 2011 123821 (Regionale toetsingscommissie euthanasie) and as casus 7 in Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2011 [Annual Report 2011] (2012). It is also summarized in Sheldon, T., “Dementia Patient's Euthanasia Was Lawful, Say Dutch Authorities,” BMJ 343, (2011): d7510, at 1. It does not appear in the English language version of the RRCs' annual report.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rurup, M. L. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. van der Heide, A. van der Wal, G. van der Maas, P. J., “Physicians' Experiences with Demented Patients with Advance Euthanasia Directives in the Netherlands,” Journal of American Geriatrics Society 53, no. 7 (2005): 1138–44, at Table 1 (n=410, weighted percentage).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See de Boer, et al., supra note 54, at 258. In the 2010 annual report of the RRCs, 25 patients with dementia received euthanasia all were found competent at that time: Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Annual Report 2010 (2011). In the 2011 Jaarverslag, supra note 56, at 11, a dementia-syndrome played a role in 49 reported cases. All were judged to have met the requirements of careful practice. All of the patients involved were considered competent.Google Scholar

KNMG, Tijdig spreken over het levenseinde [Timely end of life discussions] (KNMG, 2nd ed, 2012): 19, available at <www.knmg.nl/spreken-over-levenseinde> (last visited October 22, 2013) According to Dr.Lode Wigersma, , KNMG Director of Policy and Advice, this position is based on the patient's change in personality caused by his dementia. Zembla, Als ik dement ben, wil ik dood [When I am demented, I want to die] <http://zembla.vara.nl/Afleveringen.1973.0.html?&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=81415&cHash=de3768ac4ffe8f2414ca102affe457b6> (last visited October 22, 2013), first broadcast on February 14, 2013. On this “personal identity problem” and advance decision-making at the end of life, see Lewis, P., “Medical Treatment of Dementia Patients at the End of Life: Can the Law Accommodate the Personal Identity and Welfare Problems,” European Journal of Health Law 13, no. 3 (2006): 219–234. (last visited October 22, 2013), first broadcast on February 14, 2013. On this “personal identity problem” and advance decision-making at the end of life, see Lewis, P., “Medical Treatment of Dementia Patients at the End of Life: Can the Law Accommodate the Personal Identity and Welfare Problems,” European Journal of Health Law 13, no. 3 (2006): 219–234.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=KNMG,+Tijdig+spreken+over+het+levenseinde+[Timely+end+of+life+discussions]+(KNMG,+2nd+ed,+2012):+19,+available+at++(last+visited+October+22,+2013)+According+to+Dr.Lode+Wigersma,+,+KNMG+Director+of+Policy+and+Advice,+this+position+is+based+on+the+patient's+change+in+personality+caused+by+his+dementia.+Zembla,+Als+ik+dement+ben,+wil+ik+dood+[When+I+am+demented,+I+want+to+die]++(last+visited+October+22,+2013),+first+broadcast+on+February+14,+2013.+On+this+“personal+identity+problem”+and+advance+decision-making+at+the+end+of+life,+see+Lewis,+P.,+“Medical+Treatment+of+Dementia+Patients+at+the+End+of+Life:+Can+the+Law+Accommodate+the+Personal+Identity+and+Welfare+Problems,”+European+Journal+of+Health+Law+13,+no.+3+(2006):+219–234.>Google Scholar

van Wijlick, E. Kruseman, A. N., “Geen communicatie, geen euthanasie – reactie KNMG,” [“No communication, no euthanasia – reaction of the KNMG,”] Medisch Contact [Medical Contact] 67, no. 10 (2012): 586–587, at 587.Google Scholar

See, for example, the finding of the RRCs in 2009 that such a case involving no current communication had met the legal requirements. Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2009 [Annual Report 2009] (2010) casus 2.Google Scholar

See Zembla, , supra note 59.Google Scholar

See Rurup, et al., supra note 46, at Table 1;. Smets, T. Bilsen, J. Cohen, J. Rurup, M. L. Deliens, L., “Legal Euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of All Reported Euthanasia Cases,” Medical Care 48, no. 2 (2010): 187–192 at Table 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meeussen, K. Van den Block, L. Bossuyt, N. Echteld, M. Bilsen, J. Deliens, L., “Dealing with Requests for Euthanasia: Interview Study among General Practitioners in Belgium,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 41, no. 6 (2011): 1060–1072, at Table 2 and Table 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Commission fédérale de contrôle et d'évaluation de l'euthanasie, Cinquième rapport aux chambres législatives (2010–2011), [Federal commission for monitoring and evaluation of euthanasia, Fifth report to legislature (2010–2011)] 2012, at 7.Google Scholar

See ODPH, supra note 51, at Table 1.Google Scholar

Oregon Department of Human Services, Thirteenth Annual Report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (2011), at 2.Google Scholar

van der Heide, A. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, A. van Delden, H. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., Euthanasie en andere medische beslissingen rond het levenseinde: Sterfgevallenonderzoek 2010 [Euthanasia and other medical decisions at the end of life: Death certificate study 2010] (Den Haag: ZonMw, 2012): At Tabel 2.6.Google Scholar

Jansen-Van der Weide, M. C. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. van der Wal, G., “Granted, Undecided, Withdrawn, and Refused Requests for Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide,” Archives of Internal Medicine 165, no. 15 (2005): 1698–1704, at Table 4 (95 per cent CI = 4.2–1096).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jansen-Van der Weide, M. C. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. van der Wal, G., “Implementation of the Project ‘Support and Consultation on Euthanasia in The Netherlands’ (SCEN),” Health Policy 69, no. 3 (2004): 365–373; Jansen-Van der Weide, M. C. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. van der Wal, G., “Quality of Consultation and the Project ‘Support and Consultation on Euthanasia in the Netherlands’ (SCEN),” Health Policy 80, no. 1 (2007): 97–106.Google Scholar

KNMG, Spiegelinformatie SCEN 2011 [SCEN Annual inventory of activities 2011] (2012): At Table 4.5, available at <http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Diensten/SCEN/Spiegelinformatie-3.htm> (last visited October 23, 2013) (31.2 percent in 2008, 29.8 percent in 2009, 22.2 percent in 2010; data from the most recently performed consultation). Note that the consultation intervenes prior to the provision of euthanasia, and where the consultant finds that the due care criteria have not been met, euthanasia will usually not occur.+(last+visited+October+23,+2013)+(31.2+percent+in+2008,+29.8+percent+in+2009,+22.2+percent+in+2010;+data+from+the+most+recently+performed+consultation).+Note+that+the+consultation+intervenes+prior+to+the+provision+of+euthanasia,+and+where+the+consultant+finds+that+the+due+care+criteria+have+not+been+met,+euthanasia+will+usually+not+occur.>Google Scholar

See van der Heide, et al., supra note 48, p. 182.Google Scholar

Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. Rurup, M. L. Pasman, H. R. W. van der Heide, A., “The Last Phase of Life: Who Requests and Who Receives Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide?” Medical Care 48, no. 7 (2010): 596–603, at Table 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Jansen-van der Weide, supra note 69, at Table 1 (depression present in 0.01 percent of granted euthanasia requests and 21.3 percent of refused requests); Groenewoud, J. H. Van Der Heide, A. Tholen, A. J. Schudel, W. J. Hengeveld, M. W. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. Van Der Maas, P. J. Van Der Wal, G., “Psychiatric Consultation with Regard to Requests for Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide,” General Hospital Psychiatry 26, no. 4 (2004): 323–330. Haverkate, I. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. van Der Heide, A. Kostense, P. van Der Wal, G. van Der Maas, P., “Refused and Granted Requests for Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in The Netherlands: Interview Study with Structured Questionnaire,” BMJ 321, no. 7265 (2000): 865–866.Google Scholar

Ruijs, C. D. Kerkhof, A. van der Wal, G. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., “Depression and Explicit Requests for Euthanasia in End-of-Life Cancer Patients in Primary Care in The Netherlands: A Longitudinal, Prospective Study,” Family Practice 28, no. 4 (2011): 393–399, at 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See KNMG, supra note 7, at para 5.1.1 NVP, supra note 7, at para 5.Google Scholar

See NVP, supra note 7, at para 5.2 (stating that the rate is only 3 percent) Groenewoud, et al., supra note 74, at Table 1, p. 328 (estimating that the rate of psychiatric consultation is about 4 percent of all requests for euthanasia and assisted suicide and reporting almost twice as many requests for psychiatric consultation from psychiatrists than from non-psychiatrists).Google Scholar

Following a complaint, the regional disciplinary tribunal found that a psychiatrist had erred in deciding that the patient lacked capacity simply because he suffered from dementia: “The dementia diagnosis does not automatically mean that a patient is incompetent in relation to [the desire for euthanasia].” Regionaal Tuchtcollege Groningen [Regional Disciplinary Tribunal Groningen], December 6, 2011, LJN: YG1572 discussed in van der Heide, et al., supra note 48, at 66–67.Google Scholar

Id., at 183.Google Scholar

Id., at 184.Google Scholar

See Smets, et al., supra note 63, at Table 3.Google Scholar

See Chambaere, et al., ‘Trends in Medical End-of Life Decision Making…,” supra note 50, at Table 4.Google Scholar

Smets, T. Bilsen, J. Van den Block, L. Cohen, J. Van Casteren, V. Deliens, L., “Euthanasia in Patients Dying at Home in Belgium: Interview Study on Adherence to Legal Safeguards,” British Journal of General Practice 60, no. 573 (2010): e163–e170, at e165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Meeussen, et al., supra note 64, at Table 3.Google Scholar

Id., at Table 2.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Van Wesemael, Y. Cohen, J. Bilsen, J. Smets, T. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. Deliens, L., “Process and Outcomes of Euthanasia Requests under the Belgian Act on Euthanasia: A Nationwide Survey,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 42, no. 5 (2011): 721–733, at Table 3 and Table 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Id., at Table 3.Google Scholar

Id., at 726.Google Scholar

Ganzini, L. Nelson, H. Schmidt, T. Kraemer, D. Delorit, M. Lee, M., “Physicians' Experiences with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act,” New England Journal of Medicine 342, no. 8 (2000): 557–563, at Table 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See ODPH, supra note 51, at Table 1.Google Scholar

Ganzini, L. Dobscha, S. K. Heintz, R. T. Press, N., “Oregon Physicians' Perceptions of Patients Who Request Assisted Suicide and Their Families,” Journal of Palliative Medicine 6, no. 3 (2003): 381–390, at 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See ODHS, supra note 51, at Table 1.Google Scholar

See Ganzini, et al., supra note 56, at Table 2. Note that in Table 4 it is reported that 29 patients had depressive symptoms.Google Scholar

Hamilton, N. G. Hamilton, C. A., “Competing Paradigms of Response to Assisted Suicide Requests in Oregon,” American Journal of Psychiatry 162, no. 6 (2005): 1060–1065; Ganzini, L., “Physician-Assisted Suicide,” American Journal of Psychiatry 163, no. 6 (2006): 1109–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levene, I. Parker, M., “Prevalence of Depression in Granted and Refused Requests for Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Medical Ethics 37, no. 4 (2011): 205–211, at Table 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganzini, L. Goy, E. R. Dobscha, S. K., “Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety in Patients Requesting Physicians' Aid in Dying: Cross Sectional Survey,” BMJ 337 (2008): a1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Id., at 973.Google Scholar

Id., at 974.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

See Zurich Case, supra note 42; Aargau Case, supra note 42; Basel Case Entscheid 6B_48/2009 (11 Juni 2009) (Schweizerisches Bundesgericht) [Swiss Federal Supreme Court].Google Scholar

Wasserfallen, J.-B. Chiolero, R. Stiefel, F., “Assisted Suicide in an Acute Care Hospital: 18 Months' Experience,” Swiss Medical Weekly 138, no. 15–16 (2008): 239–242, at 240.Google Scholar

See Bosshard, et al., supra note 52, at 313.Google Scholar

Bosshard, G. Ulrich, E. Ziegler, S. J. Bar, W., “Assessment of Requests for Assisted Suicide by a Swiss Right-to-Die Society,” Death Studies 32, no. 7 (2008): 646–657, at Table 1. This evidence is of highly questionable quality, as discussed in the analysis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, S. Huber, C. Imhof, L. Mahrer Imhof, R. Furter, M. Ziegler, S. Bosshard, G., “Suicide Assisted by Two Swiss Right-to-Die Organisations,” Journal of Medical Ethics 34, no. 11 (2008): 810–814, at Table 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Haas, supra note 42; Black, , supra note 45.Google Scholar

See van der Heide, et al., supra note 68, at Table 2.6.Google Scholar

See SCEN 2011, supra note 71, at Table 4.5.Google Scholar

See van der Heide, et al., supra note 48, at 182.Google Scholar

See Smets, et al., supra note 63, at Table 3.Google Scholar

See Smets, et al., supra note 83, at Table 2.Google Scholar

See Meeussen, et al., supra note 64, at Table 2.Google Scholar

Oregon Department of Human Services, Oregon's Death with Dignity Act: Three Years of Legalized Physician-Assisted suicide (2001): At 4.Google Scholar

Oregon Department of Human Services, Fourth Annual Report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (2002), at 10; Oregon Department of Human Services, Sixth Annual Report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (2004), at 13; Oregon Department of Human Services, Seventh Annual Report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (2005), at 14; Oregon Department of Human Services, Eighth Annual Report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (2006), at 13; Oregon Department of Human Services, Twelfth Annual Report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (2010), at 2.Google Scholar

Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2004 [Annual Report 2004] (2005) casus 14.Google Scholar

See Griffiths, et al., supra note 8, at 169.Google Scholar

See van der Heide, et al., supra note 48, at 188.Google Scholar

Id., at 189.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

See Smets, et al., supra note 83, at Table 2.Google Scholar

See Griffiths, et al., supra note 8, at 169.Google Scholar

Two such cases appear in the annual report for 2009: RRC, Jaarverslag 2009, supra note 61: Casi 2, 13. In case 2, the patient had developed aphasia which prevented a written request but the RRC was satisfied that the request by means of hand gestures, repeated at a later date in the presence of the patient's daughter, had been competent, and that the physician had paid particular attention to the issue of the patient's competence. In case 13, the patient had made repeated oral requests, but at the time of admission to hospital was no longer able to make a written request. Although this fact alone would not necessarily have resulted in a judgment of “not careful,” the fact that the consulted physician had not been able to assess the patient's capacity did result in such a judgment. Only case 2 appears in the English language version of the Annual Report: Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Annual Report 2009 (2010): At 9.Google Scholar

Smets, T. Bilsen, J. Cohen, J. Rurup, M. L. Mortier, F. Deliens, L., “Reporting of Euthanasia in Medical Practice in Flanders, Belgium: Cross Sectional Analysis of Reported and Unreported Cases,” BMJ 341, (2010): c5174, at Table 3. The response rate in this study was only 58 percent so the data should be used cautiously.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Rurup, et al., supra note 46, at Table 1; Smets, et al., supra note 63, at Table 3.Google Scholar

See Smets, et al., supra note 83, at Table 2.Google Scholar

See Meeussen, et al., supra note 64, at Table 2 and Table 3.Google Scholar

Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2005 [Annual Report 2005] (2006): Casus 3.Google Scholar

One in 2003; two in 2004; one in 2006.Google Scholar

See Smets, et al., supra note 123, at Table 2.Google Scholar

Pousset, G. Bilsen, J. Cohen, J. Chambaere, K. Deliens, L. Mortier, F., “Medical End-of-Life Decisions in Children in Flanders, Belgium: A Population-Based Postmortem Survey,” Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 164, no. 6 (2010): 547–553, at Table 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Smets, et al., supra note 83, at Table 1.Google Scholar

See Meeussen, et al., supra note 64, at Table 1.Google Scholar

See Chambaere, et al., (2012), supra note 50, at 458.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Van Wesemael, et al., supra note 87, at Table 3.Google Scholar

Commissie Late Zwangerschapsafbreking en Levensbeëindiging bij Pasgeborenen [Commission on late abortion and termination of life of neonates] (LZA-LP), Jaarverslag 2007 [Annual Report 2007] (2008) LZA-LP, Jaarverslag 2008 [Annual Report 2008] (2009) LZA-LP, Gecombineerd Jaarverslag over de jaren 2009 en 2010 [Combined Annual Report 2009–2010] (2011) LZA-LP, Gecombineerd Jaarverslag over de jaren 2011 en 2012 [Combined Annual Report 2011–2012] (2013).Google Scholar

See de Boer, et al., supra note 54, at 260.Google Scholar

See Wijlick, Kruseman, , supra note 60, at 587.Google Scholar

Id., at 261.Google Scholar

See Rurup, , supra note 46, at 47.Google Scholar

See Lewis, , supra note 20, at 127.Google Scholar

Id., at 127–128.Google Scholar

Sénat de Belgique, , Proposition de loi modifiant la loi du 28 mai 2002 relative à l'euthanasie [Bill to amend the Euthanasia Act (Belgium) 2002] (S 5–1611) (2012).Google Scholar

See Smets, et al., supra note 63, at Table 3; see RRC, Jaarverslag 2005, supra note 127; Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2006 [Annual Report 2006] (2007) Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2007 [Annual Report 2007] (2008) Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2008 [Annual Report 2008] (2009) RRC, Jaarverslag 2009, supra note 61; Regional Review Committees Euthanasia, Jaarverslag 2010 [Annual Report 2010] (2011) RRC, Jaarverslag 2011, supra note 56.Google Scholar

See Bosshard, , supra note 37, at 464–465.Google Scholar

See, e.g., Hamilton, Hamilton, , supra note 42; Ganzini, L., “Commentary: Assessment of Clinical Depression in Patients Who Request Physician-Assisted Death,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 19, no. 6 (2000): 474–478 Finlay, I. George, R., “Legal Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon and The Netherlands: Evidence Concerning the Impact on Patients in Vulnerable Groups - Another Perspective on Oregon's Data,” Journal of Medical Ethics 37, no. 3 (2011): 171–174.Google Scholar

Battin, M. P. van der Heide, A. Ganzini, L. van der Wal, G. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., “Legal Physician-Assisted Dying in Oregon and The Netherlands: Evidence Concerning the Impact on Patients in “Vulnerable” Groups,” Journal of Medical Ethics 33, no. 10 (2007): 591–597, at 596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Finlay, George, , supra note 146, at 173.Google Scholar

See Ganzini, , supra note 97, at 974. Note that this study was not available at the time of Battin et al.'s review.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id., at 975.Google Scholar

See Bosshard, et al., supra note 104, at Table 1.Google Scholar

Id., at 652.Google Scholar

Id., at 655.Google Scholar

See Black, , supra note 45, at 164–165.Google Scholar

See Van Wesemael, et al., supra note 87, at 731.Google Scholar

See Sénat de Belgique, Proposition de loi complétant, en ce qui concerne les mineurs, la loi du 28 mai 2002 relative à l'euthanasie [Bill to add provisions in respect of minors to the Euthanasia Act (Belgium) 2002] (S 5–1947) (2013).Google Scholar