Veterans Health Administration, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Ethical Boundaries in the Patient-Clinician Relationship: A Report by the National Ethics Committee of the Veterans Health Administration, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, D.C., 2003, at 1 [hereinafter cited as VHA National Ethics Committee].Google Scholar

Starr, P., The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry (New York: Basic Books, 1982):15.Google Scholar

Cavell, S., Must We Mean What We Say? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976): at 101.Google Scholar

“Technological advances in medicine have greatly enhanced the capacity of health care providers to prevent, detect, diagnose and treat disease; to rehabilitate those with physical or other handicaps, and to promote health….Unfortunately, they have also brought with them unprecedented problems concerning risk and benefit, costs and effectiveness, and ethical and legal implications for patients, clinicians, and society.” Reiser, S. J. Anbar, M., “Introduction,” in Reiser, S. J. Anbar, M., eds., The Machine at the Bedside (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984): At xv.Google Scholar

Brint, S., In an Age of Experts: The Changing Roles of Professionals in Politics and Public Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Kanoti, G. A. Youngner, S. J., “Clinical Ethics Consultation,” Encyclopedia of Bioethics (New York: Macmillan, 1995): 404–409; Aulisio, M. P. Arnold, R. M. Youngner, S. J., “Health Care Ethics Consultation: Nature, Goals, and Competencies,” Annals of Internal Medicine 133, no. 1 (2000): 59–69; see also, Andre, J., Bioethics as Practice (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Pellegrino, E. D., “Bioethics as an Interdisciplinary Enterprise: Where Does Ethics Fit in the Mosaic of Disciplines?” in Carson, R. A. Burns, C. R., eds., Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics (Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer, 1997): 1–25, at 2.Google ScholarPubMed

Yeo, M., “Prolegomena to Any Future Code of Ethics for Bioethicists,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2, no. 4 (1993): 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spielman, B. J., Bioethics in Law (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2006): At vii.Google Scholar

Eckenwiler, L. A. Cohn, F. G., “Introduction,” in Eckenwiler, L. A. Cohn, F. A., eds., The Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007): At xix.Google Scholar

“Instituting…a code [of ethics] has not been much on the ethics industry agenda. This is an incongruous omission in a guild whose bread and butter is the evaluation of codes of ethics. Codes were thought to have a place and in fact are now in place, not just for physicians and attorneys, but for engineers, policemen, businessmen, all kinds of counselors and therapists, and practitioners of some scholarly trades like cultural anthropology….It is anything but obvious why a code [of ethics] for applied ethicists would be less appropriate or functional than for any of these others.” Wertheimer, R., “Socratic Skepticism,” in Winker, E. A. Coombs, J. R., eds., Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, 1993): 143–163, at 158; see also, Baker, R., “A History of Codes of Ethics for Bioethicists,” in Eckenwiler, Cohn, , supra note 10, at 24–40; Freedman, B., “Bringing Codes to Newcastle: Ethics for Clinical Ethicists,” in Hoffmaster, B. Freedman, B. Fraser, G., eds., Clinical Ethics: Theory and Practice (Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1989): At 125–139; Baker, R., “A Draft Model Aggregated Code of Ethics for Ethicists,” American Journal of Bioethics 5, no. 5 (September-October 2005): 33–41; Brody, B. Dubler, N. Blustein, J. et al., “Bioethics Consultation in the Private Sector,” Hastings Center Report 32, no. 3 (May-June 2002): 14–20.Google Scholar

Writing about this “nascent profession” more than 10 years ago, George Kanoti and Stuart Youngner observed, “Despite growing interest in and practice of ethics consultation, important questions remain….Unlike traditional medical consultants, clinical ethics consultants are not subject to widely accepted standards and procedures for training, credentialing, maintaining accountability, charging fees, obtaining informed consent, or providing liability coverage.” See Kanoti, Youngner, , supra note 6, at 405; see also, Spielman, B. J., “Has Faith in Health Care Ethics Consultants Gone Too Far? Risks of an Unregulated Practice and a Model Act to Contain Them,” Marquette Law Review 85, no. 1 (2001): 161–221.Google Scholar

The description of medical ethicists used by a medical ethicist 25 years ago still holds true today: “They do not have a license to look and listen to doctors and patients. Their justification is a discipline of some sort that claims its methods and insights will somehow improve the quality of those activities.” Jonsen, A. R., “Watching the Doctor,” New England Journal of Medicine 308, no. 25 (1983): 1531–1535, at 1531–1532. “The people who began to write, teach, speak and otherwise do the work of bioethics were not professionally trained in it. They came from religion, medicine, philosophy, law, nursing, the social sciences and literature….Some stumbled into the territory having never sought it out….Some were professionally homeless. People who had spent five or ten years of their lives earning a doctorate emerged into a fiercely competitive academic world, in which the losers were not simply undistinguished, but unemployed. Some were tourists. A few have come to the field as hustlers. The field offers the opportunity to make a name or, if not quite a fortune, more money than in the usual academic life.” See Andre, , supra note 6, at 28. (Emphasis added.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Starr, , supra note 2, at 9–29.Google Scholar

“Only persons with certain sorts of licenses or roles or duties are allowed to observe the intimacies of the ‘doctor-patient relationship.’” See Jonsen, , supra note 13, at 1531; see also, La Puma, J. Priest, E. R., “Medical Staff Privileges for Ethics Consultants: An Institutional Model,” Quality Review Bulletin 18, no. 1 (January 1992): 17–20; Siegler, M., “Defining the Goals of Ethics Consultations: A Necessary Step for Improving Quality,” Quality Review Bulletin 18, no. 1 (January 1992): 15–16.Google Scholar

See Aulisio, Arnold, Youngner, , supra note 6, at 66–67.Google Scholar

American Society for Bioethics and the Humanities, Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation: The Report of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics Consultation, 1998) [hereinafter cited as ASBH]; see also, SHHV-SBC, Discussion Draft of the Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation (undated document); see also, Post, L. F. Blustein, J. Dubler, N. N., Handbook for Healthcare Ethics Committees (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Compare, Pellegrino, E. D., “Clinical Ethics Consultation: Some Reflections on the Report of the SHHV-SBC,” Journal of Clinical Ethics 10, no. 1 (1999): 5–12, with Ross, J. W., “The Task Force Report: Comprehensible Forest or Unknown Beetles?” Journal of Clinical Ethics 10, no. 1 (1999): 26–33; King, N. M. P., “Who Ate the Apple? A Commentary on the Core Competencies Report,” Healthcare Ethics Committee Forum 10, no. 2 (1999): 170–175, and Churchill, L. R., “Are We Professionals? A Critical Look at the Social Role of Bioethicists,” Daedalus 128, no. 4 (1999): 253–274. Pellegrino found the report “timely” and “welcome,” but also concluded that “it is long-winded, it sidesteps some of the thornier issues, it sacrifices clarity in the interests of inclusiveness, and it mutes differing opinions [in order] to preserve a conciliatory tone.” Pellegrino, id., at 5. According to King, “[T]he report does not successfully address the central challenge in the long-standing debate about ethics consultation – which is to describe the work of ethics consultation in such a way that only people with the requisite education can and should do it.” King, id., at 171. At the time, the task force said: “[A]t this time, the Task Force recommends that its report be used only for voluntary guidelines. The specification ‘at this time’ is not meant to imply that the Task Force contemplates mandatory guidelines at some later time. Rather, the specification is meant to signal no more than our assessment of the current state of knowledge and our recognition that this state is always evolving.” SHHV-SBC, id., at 5; ASBH, id., at 32.Google Scholar

Fox, E. Myers, S. Pearlman, R. A., “Ethics Consultation in United States Hospitals: A National Survey,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 13–25; Gordon, E. J., “A Better Way to Evaluate Clinical Ethics Consultations? An Ecological Approach,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 26–29; Zaner, R. M., “A Comment on Community Consultation,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 29–31; Fiester, A., “The Failure of the Consult Model: Why ‘Mediation’ Should Replace ‘Consultation,’” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 31–32; Silberman, J. Morrison, W. Feudtner, C., “Pride and Prejudice: How Might Ethics Consultation Services Minimize Bias?” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 32–34; Dubler, N. N. Blustein, J., “Credentialing Ethics Consultants: An Invitation to Collaboration,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 35–37; Parsi, K. Kuczewski, M. G., “Failure to Thrive: Can Education Save the Life of Ethics Consultation?” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 37–39; Dudzinski, D. M., “Education to Dispel the Myth,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 39–40; Jotkowitz, A. B., “Ethics Consultation: Whose Ethics?” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 41–42; Smith, M. L. Weise, K. L., “The Goal of Ethics Consultation: Rejecting the Role of the ‘Ethics Police,’” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 42–44; Scofield, G. R., “The War on Error,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 44–45; Ford, P. J. Boissy, A. R., “Different Questions, Different Goals,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 46–47; Klitzman, R., “Additional Implications of a National Survey on Ethics Consultation in United States Hospitals,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 47–48; Spike, J. P., “Who's Guarding the Henhouse? Ramifications of the Fox Study,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“Although the prevalence of [ethics consultation services] in U.S. hospitals is quite high, there appear to be wide variations in practice, a lack of formal training, and few mechanisms for quality control. To ensure the quality and consistency of ethics consultation practices, we believe that there is a need for clear standards for ethics consultation practice, for educational resources to assist [ethics consultation services] in implementing those standards, and for tools to determine whether those standards are being met.” See Fox, Myers, Pearlman, , id., at 19. “[T]he ethics consultation system we have in place in the United States is not working.” See Fiester, , id., at 32. “What is to be done? If the field of clinical ethics consultation is to legitimately be considered a ‘profession’ and not merely an assortment of individuals with varying degrees of expertise, knowledge, and supervision, standards have to be developed.” See Dubler, Blustein, , id., at 35.Google Scholar

“Let us take this sobering study to heart and start to guard the henhouse rather than continue to run around clucking that the sky is falling.” See Spike, , supra note 20, at 50; see also, Fox, E. Myers, S. Pearlman, R. A., “Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: A National Survey,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 2 (February 2007): W1–W3.Google Scholar

“[I]t is more necessary than ever today… to read well…, to read slowly, deeply, looking cautiously before and aft, with doors left open, with delicate eyes and fingers.” Nietzsche, F., Daybreak (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997): At 5 (emphasis in original); see also, Ricoeur, P., Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970): 20–36; see also, Burt, R. A., “The Uses of Psychoanalysis in Law: The Force of Jay Katz's Example,” Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 6, no. 2 (2006): 401–413; Bosk, C., “A More Skeptical Bioethics,” Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 6, no. 2 (2006): 425–429; Meissner, W. W., The Ethical Dimension of Psychoanalysis: A Dialogue (Albany: SUNY Press, 2003).Google Scholar

See VHA National Ethics Committee, supra note 1, at 1.Google Scholar

Aulisio, M., “Minutes” (final version), ShHV-SBC Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation, Meeting One, May 24–26, 1996 (July 18, 1996): At 4. (Emphasis added.)Google Scholar

Burgess, M. Bereza, E. Campion, B. et al., “Feeder Disciplines: The Education and Training of Health Care Ethics Consultants,” in Baylis, F., ed., The Health Care Ethics Consultant (Totowa, NJ: Humana, 1994): 63–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mizrachi, N. Shuval, J. T., “Between Formal and Enacted Policy: Changing the Contours of Boundaries,” Social Science & Medicine 60, no. 7 (2005): 1649–1660; see also, Gieryn, T. F., “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists,” American Sociological Review 48, no. 6 (1983): 781–795; Gieryn, T. F., Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999): 1–35, 336–362; Larson, M. S., The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (Berkeley: University of California, 1977): 41–51; Lamont, M. Molnar, V., “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences,” American Review of Sociology 28 (2002): 167–195; Abbott, A., “Things of Boundaries,” Social Research 62, no. 4 (1995): 857–882; Abbott, A., The System of Professions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Committee on Ethics of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “Seeking and Giving Consultation,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 109, no. 5 (2007): 1255–1260; Salerno, S. M. Hurst, F. P. Halvorson, S. et al., “Principles of Effective Consultation: An Update for the 21st Century Consultant,” Archives of Internal Medicine 167, no. 3 (2007): 271–275; Goldman, L. Lee, T. Rudd, P., “Ten Commandments for Effective Consultations,” Archives of Internal Medicine 143, no. 9 (1983): 1753–1755; Cohn, S. L., “The Role of the Medical Consultant,” Medical Clinics of North America 87, no. 1 (2003): 1–6; Emanuel, L. L. Richter, J., “The Consultant and the Physician-Patient Relationship: A Trilateral Deliberative Model,” Archives of Internal Medicine 154, no. 16 (1994): 1785–1790; Pasnau, R., “Ten Commandments of Medical Etiquette for Psychiatrists,” Psychosomatics 26, no. 2 (1985): 128–132; see also, Frader, J. E., “Political and Interpersonal Aspects of Ethics Consultation,” Theoretical Medicine 13, no. 1 (1992): 31–44.Google Scholar

Cummins, D., “The Professional Status of Bioethics Consultation,” Theoretical Medicine & Bioethics 23, no. 1 (2002): 19–43; see also, Ozar, D. T., “Profession and Professional Ethics,” in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, supra note 6, at 2103–2112; Agich, G. J., “Professionalism and Ethics in Health Care,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5, no. 3 (1980): 186–199; Churchill, L. R., “The Professionalization of Ethics: Some Implications for Accountability in Medicine,” Soundings 60, no. 1 (1977): 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, F. G. Fins, J. J. Bachetta, M. D., “Clinical Pragmatism: John Dewey and Clinical Ethics,” Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy 13, no. 1 (1996): 27–51, at 28.Google Scholar

See Kanoti, Youngner, , supra note 6, at 404.Google Scholar

La Puma, J. Toulmin, S., “Ethics Committees and Ethics Consultants,” Archives of Internal Medicine 149, no. 5 (1989): 1109–1112, at 1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agich, G. J., “Clinical Ethics: A Role Theoretic Look,” Social Science & Medicine 30, no. 4 (1990): 389–399, at 392; see also, Agich, G. J., “Roles and Responsibilities: Theoretical Issues in the Definition of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry,” Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 10, no. 4 (1985): 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winslade, W. J., “Ethics Consultation: Cases in Context,” Albany Law Review 57, no. 3 (1992): 679–691, at 682. According to Andre, “[B]ioethics is something like a practice[, whose] goals may be thought of as a loose bundle (keeping moral space open, designing solutions, promoting a better public discourse) or. as a mutual engagement in moral growth.” See Andre, , supra note 6, at 102.Google Scholar

Capron, A. M. Michel, V., “Law and Bioethics,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 27, no. 1 (1993): 25–40, at 30.Google Scholar

Fox, M. D. McGee, G. Caplan, A., “Paradigms for Clinical Ethics Consultation Practice,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7, no. 3 (1998): 308–314, at 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“What is a bioethicist? We might suppose that we can define this role…[but] this keeps changing.” Wikler, D., “Bioethics and Social Responsibility,” Bioethics 11, nos. 3–4 (1997): 185–92, at 185. “People do not know who we are; indeed, we may not know who we are ourselves.” Jonsen, A. R., “Beating Up Bioethics,” Hastings Center Report 31, no. 3 (May 2001): 40–45, at 44; see also, Agich, G. J., “What Kind of Doing Is Clinical Ethics?” Theoretical Medicine 26, no. 1 (2005): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See SHHV-SBC, supra note 18, at 3.Google Scholar

See Aulisio, Arnold, Youngner, , supra note 6, at 59.Google Scholar

La Puma, J. Schiedermayer, D., Ethics Consultation: A Practical Guide (Boston: Jones & Bartlett, 1994): At 53–55.Google Scholar

Veterans Health Administration National Center for Ethics, Ethics Consultation: Responding to Ethics Concerns in Health Care, VHA National Center for Ethics, Washington, D.C., 2007, at 3.Google Scholar

Id., at 44.Google Scholar

Id., at 45.Google Scholar

Id., at 44.Google Scholar

Agich, G. J., “Authority in Ethics Consultation,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 23, no. 3 (1995): 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Society for Bioethics and the Humanities Clinical Ethics Task Force, Improving Competence in Clinical Ethics Consultation: A Learner's Guide, undated draft, at 1 [hereinafter cited as ASBH Clinical Ethics Task Force].Google Scholar

Id., at 2.Google Scholar

Id., at 1, n. 1.Google Scholar

“Facts are just what there aren’t, there are only interpretations. My main proposition: There are no moral phenomena, there is only a moral interpretation of these phenomena.” Nietzsche, F., Writings from the Late Notebooks (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003): At 139, 94. (Emphasis in original.) “There are no moral facts whatever….Morality is only an interpretation of certain phenomena.” Nietzsche, F., Twilight of the Idols (New York: Penguin Books, 1990): At 66. (Emphasis in original.)Google Scholar

Meyers, C., A Practical Guide to Clinical Ethics Consulting: Expertise, Ethos, and Power (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2007): at 11.Google Scholar

“The clinical ethicist's role has been the subject of extensive debate in the bioethics literature, but one point that everyone accepts is that the specifics of the consultant's role are as varied as are the people engaged in the work.” Meyers, C., “Clinical Ethics Consulting and Conflict of Interest: Structurally Intertwined,” Hastings Center Report 37, no. 2 (March-April 2007): 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“Trimming the Fat,” The Economist (Special Survey) 3, March 22, 1997.Google Scholar

Hoffmaster, B., “The Form and Limits of Medical Ethics,” Social Science and Medicine 39, no. 9 (1994): 1155–1164, at 1162. Hoffmaster quickly adds, “Much of the time in practical ethics they are objectionable as well, largely because they serve to cloud responsibility.” Id. Indeed, “vagueness may be used as a vehicle for the exercise of control or for the evasion of control.” Schön, D. A., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (New York: Basic Books, 1983): At 305. “Rather than comfort…deliberate vagueness creates confusion, anxiety and unrealistic expectations.” See Post, Blustein, Dubler, , supra note 18, at 55. As one medical ethicist has observed, “[I]t is important for professionals to promote their authority and establish their role as indispensable by mystifying their particular knowledge and skills, and by fostering the dependence of others on their services.” Sherwin, S., “Certification of Health Care Ethics Consultants: Advantages and Disadvantages,” in Baylis, F. E., ed., The Health Care Ethics Consultant (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1994): 11–24, at 18; see also, Cummins, supra note 29, at 23–24. Depending on the circumstances, uncertainty and ambiguity, therefore, can be the ethicist's friend or the ethicist's foe, an insight that is sociologically and psychologically significant. See, for example, Nilson, L. B., “An Application of the Occupational ‘Uncertainty Principle’ to the Professions,” Social Problems 26, no. 5 (1979): 570–581; Light, D., “Uncertainty and Control in Professional Training,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 20, no. 4 (1979): 310–322; Horowitz, M. J., “Sliding Meanings: A Defense against Threat in Narcissistic Personalities,” International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy 4 (1975): 167–180; Maldonado, J. L., “On Ambiguity, Confusion and the Ego Ideal,” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 74, pt. 1 (1993): 93–100; Katz, J., The Silent World of Doctor and Patient (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002): 165–206; Katz, J., “Why Physicians Don’t Disclose Uncertainty,” Hastings Center Report 14, no. 1 (February 1984): 35–44; Scofield, G., “Why Medical Ethicists Don’t (and Won’t) Share Uncertainty,” in Rubin, S. Zoloth, L., eds., Margin of Error: The Ethics of Mistakes in the Practice of Medicine (Hagerstown, MD: University Press Group, 2000): 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goode, W. J., “Encroachment, Charlatanism, and the Emerging Profession: Psychology, Sociology and Medicine,” American Sociological Review 25, no. 6 (1960): 902–914; Pettigrew, A. M., “Occupational Specialization as an Emergent Process,” Sociology Review 21, no. 2 (1973): 255–278; Baer, W. C., “Expertise and Professional Standards,” Work & Occupations 13, no. 4 (1986): 532–552; see Abbott, , supra note 27, at 38–113, 280–314; Reed, M. I., “Expert Power and Control in Late Modernity: An Empirical View and Theoretical Synthesis,” Organization Studies 17, no. 4 (1996): 573–597.Google Scholar

See VHA National Ethics Committee, supra note 1, at 2. “It is incumbent on the individual ethics consultant to recognize her strengths and limitations, and to get help when needed.” See Post, Blustein, Dubler, , Handbook, supra note 18, at 141.Google Scholar

See Aulisio, Arnold, Youngner, , supra note 6, at 61.Google Scholar

Id., at 60–61.Google Scholar

See, for example, McGee, G., “Therapeutic Clinical Ethics,” Health Care Ethics Committee Forum 9, no. 3 (1997): 276–279; Goold, S. D., “Is Distance Critical for Clinical Ethicists? – A Reply to Glenn McGee,” Health Care Ethics Committee Forum 9, no. 3 (1997): 280–283; Churchill, L. R. Cross, A. W., “Moralist, Technician, Sophist, Teacher/Learner: Reflections on the Ethicist in the Clinical Setting,” Theoretical Medicine 7, no. 1 (1986): 3–12; Glover, J. Ozar, D. T. Thomasma, D. C., “Teaching Ethics on Rounds: The Ethicist as Teacher, Consultant, Decisionmaker,” Theoretical Medicine 7, no. 1 (1986): 13–32; Walker, M. U., “Keeping Moral Spaces Open: New Images of Ethics Consultation,” Hastings Center Report 23, no. 2 (March-April 1993): 33–40; Self, D. Skeel, J., “Potential Roles of the Medical Ethicist in the Clinical Setting,” Theoretical Medicine 7, no. 1 (1986): 33–39; Aulisio, M. P. Arnold, R. M. Youngner, S. J., “Can There be Educational and Training Standards for Those Conducting Health Care Ethics Consultation?” in Thomasma, D. Monagle, J., eds., Health Care Ethics: Critical Issues for the 21st Century (Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, 1998): 484–496.Google Scholar

See SHHV-SBC, supra note 18, at 7–8.Google Scholar

See ASBH, supra note 18, at 5–6; Aulisio, Arnold, Youngner, , supra note 6, at 60–61.Google Scholar

Id. (Aulisio, Arnold, Youngner, ), at 61.Google Scholar

See ASBH, supra note 18, at 5; Aulisio, Arnold, Youngner, , supra note 6, at 60.Google Scholar

Sontag, D. N., “What is Wrong with “Ethics for Sale”? An Analysis of the Many Issues that Complicate the Debate about Conflicts of Interest in Bioethics,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 1 (2007): 175–186, at 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scully, J. L., “Drawing a Line: Situating Moral Boundaries in Genetic Medicine,” Bioethics 15, no. 3 (2001): 189–204, at 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See, for example, Nadelson, C. Notman, M. T., “Boundaries in the Doctor-Patient Relationship,” Theoretical Medicine 23, no. 3 (2002): 191–201; Frank, A. W., “The Painter and the Cameraman: Boundaries in Clinical Relationships,” Theoretical Medicine 23, no. 3 (2002): 219–232; Coombs, G. Freedman, J., “Relationships, Not Boundaries,” Theoretical Medicine 23, no. 3 (2002): 203–217.Google Scholar

Hilliard, B., “The Politics of Palliative Care and the Ethical Boundaries of Medicine: Gonzales v. Oregon as a Cautionary Tale,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 1 (2007): 158–174; Szalados, J. F., “Discontinuation of Mechnical Ventilation at End-of-Life: The Ethical and Legal Boundaries of Physician Conduct in the Termination of Life Support,” Critical Care Clinics 23, no. 2 (2007): 317–337; Bliton, M. J. Finder, Stuart G., “Traversing Boundaries: Clinical Ethics, Moral Experience, and the Withdrawal of Life Supports,” Theoretical Medicine 23, no. 3 (2002): 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“In much advocacy work, the boundary between research and therapy is fuzzy.” Dresser, R., When Science Offers Salvation: Patient Advocacy & Research Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001): at 9.Google Scholar

Lynn, J. Baily, M. A. Bottrell, M. et al., “The Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health Care,” Annals of Internal Medicine 146, no. 9 (2007): 666–672; Grady, C., “Quality Improvement and Ethical Oversight,” Annals of Internal Medicine 146, no. 9 (2007): 677–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, C. E., “Contested Boundaries: Psychiatry, Disease, and Diagnosis,” Perspectives in Biology & Medicine 49, no. 3 (2006): 407–424; Martinez, R., “The Nature of Illness Experience: A Course on Boundaries,” Theoretical Medicine 23, no. 3 (2002): 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wainwright, S. P. Williams, C. et al., “Ethical Boundary-Work in the Embryonic Stem Cell Laboratory,” Sociology of Health & Illness 28, no. 6 (2006): 732–748. “Medical scientists equivocate on the exact beginning and ending of life (as loved ones, ethicists, religious activists, feminists, prospective organdonor recipients press their cases). See Gieryn, (Cultural Boundaries), supra note 27, at 2–3. (Emphasis added).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“Discussions of…boundaries, not surprisingly, comprise a large portion of the bioethics literature (e.g. explorations of informed consent, autonomy, confidentiality, privacy, resource allocation, and conscientious objection).” See ASBH, supra note 18, at 4.Google Scholar

See, for example, Gabbard, G. O. Lester, E. P., Boundaries and Boundary Violations in Psychoanalysis (New York: Basic Books, 1995); Peterson, M. R., At Personal Risk: Boundary Violations in Professional-Client Relationships (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1992); Epstein, R. S., Keeping Boundaries: Maintaining Safety and Integrity in the Psychotherapeutic Process (Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, 1994).Google ScholarPubMed

Jones, J. W. McCullough, L. B., “Ethics of Unprofessional Behavior that Disrupts: Crossing the Line,” Journal of Vascular Surgery 45, no. 2 (2007): 433–455; National Ethics Committee of the Veterans Health Administration, Ethical Boundaries in the Patient-Clinician Relationship, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, D.C., July 2003; Preisman, R. C. Steinberg, M. D. Rummans, T. A. et al., “An Annotated Bibliography for Ethics Training in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry,” Psychosomatics 40, no. 5 (1999): 369–379; Farber, N. J. Novack, D. H. Silverstein, J. et al., “Physicians with Patients Who Transgress Boundaries,” Journal of General Internal Medicine 15, no. 11 (2000): 770–775; Baylis, F., “Therapist-Patient Sexual Contact: A Nonconsensual, Inherently Harmful Activity,” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 38, no. 7 (1993): 502–506; Yarborough, M., “The Reluctant Retained Witness: Alleged Sexual Misconduct in the Doctor/Patient Relationship,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22, no. 4 (1997): 345–364; Martinez, R., “Professionalism and Boundaries,” Theoretical Medicine 23, no. 3 (2002): 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutheil, T. G. Gabbard, G. O., “Misuses and Misunderstandings of Boundary Theory in Clinical and Regulatory Settings,” American Journal of Psychiatry 155, no. 3 (1998): 409–414, at 410; see also, Gutheil, T. G. Gabbard, G. O., “The Concept of Boundaries in Clinical Practice: Theoretical and Risk Management Dimensions,” American Journal of Psychiatry 150, no. 2 (1993): 189–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Gutheil, Gabbard, (“Concept of Boundaries”), supra note 80, at 190.Google Scholar

“Attempts to define the boundaries of the therapeutic relationship yield limited results, because codifying all aspects of human interaction is impossible….This leaves us with the challenge of distinguishing between boundary crossings that further the treatment and those that damage it.” Waldinger, R. J., “Boundary Crossings and Boundary Violations: Thoughts on Navigating a Slippery Slope,” Harvard Review of Psychiatry 2, no. 4 (1994): 225–227, at 225; see also, Glass, L. L., “The Gray Areas of Boundary Crossings and Violations,” American Journal of Psychotherapy 57, no. 4 (2003): 429–444; Radden, J., “Boundary Violation Ethics: Some Conceptual Clarifications,” Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law 29, no. 3 (2001): 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Gutheil, Gabbard, (“Misuses and Misunderstandings”), supra note 80, at 410; see also, Gutheil, T. G., “Boundary Issues and Personality Disorders,” Journal of Psychiatric Practice 11, no. 2 (2005): 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutheil, Gabbard, (“Misuses and Misunderstandings”), supra, note 80, at 413; see also, Psychopathology Committee of the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, “Reexamination of Therapist Self-Disclosure,” Psychiatric Services 52, no. 11 (2001): 1489–1493, at 1490–1491.Google Scholar

Gruenberg, P. B., “Boundary Violations,” in American Psychiatric Association, Ethics Primer of the American Psychiatric Association (Washington, D.C.: APA, 2001): 1–9, at 5.Google Scholar

See, Katz, G. A., “Where the Action Is: The Enacted Dimension of Analytic Process,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 46, no. 4 (1998): 1129–1167; Hirsch, I., “The Concept of Enactment and Theoretical Convergence,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 67, no. 1 (1998): 78–101; Renik, O., “Countertransference Enactment and the Psychoanalytic Process,” in Horowitz, M. J. Kernberg, O. F. Weinshel, E. M., eds., Psychicstructure and Psychic Change: Essays in Honor of Robert S. Wallerstein (Madison, CT: International University Press, 1993): 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabbard, G. O. Nadelson, C., “Professional Boundaries in the Physician-patient Relationship,” JAMA 273, no. 14 (1995): 1445–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gula, R. M., Ethics in Pastoral Ministry (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Institute of Medicine, Assessing Genetic Risks (Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press, 1994): at 148–184.Google Scholar

Brendel, D. H. Chu, J. Radden, J. et al., “The Price of a Gift: An Approach to Receiving Gifts from Patients in Psychiatric Practice,” Harvard Review of Psychiatry 15, no. 2 (2007): 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Post, S. G. Pulchaski, C. M. Larson, D. B., “Physicians and Patient Spirituality: Professional Boundaries, Competency and Ethics,” Annals of Internal Medicine 132, no. 7 (2000): 578–583; Kuczewski, M. G., “Talking about Spirituality in the Clinical Setting: Can Being Professional Require Being Personal?” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 7 (July 2007): 4–11; see also, Meisel, A., “A ‘Dignitary Tort’ as a Bridge between the Idea of Informed Consent and the Law of Informed Consent,” Law, Medicine & Health Care 16, nos. 3–4 (1988): 210–218. “While part of the concern for human beings contained in our culture relates to protecting [them] personally, part [of the concern for human beings] also relates to the respect which is deemed proper for the ‘non-physical’ aspects of [humanity], such as [the] power of thought.” Katz, J. Capron, A. M., Catastrophic Diseases: Who Decides What? (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1982): 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“The sole goal of the pure facilitation approach is to forge consensus among involved parties….By placing too much emphasis on facilitating consensus, consultants risk forging a consensus that falls outside acceptable boundaries.” Id. Edmund G. Howe noted that there was something inherently problematic about the ethics facilitation approach, in that it might not end up differing all that much from the authoritarian approach. Howe, E. G., “Ethics Consultants: Could They Do Better?” Journal of Clinical Ethics 10, no. 1 (1999): 13–25, at 15–21. Although three members of the task force believed that “Howe's caveats should serve as a wise caution to ethics consultants to take steps to guard against the dangers of subtle, unintended, or merely perceived abuses of power,” they concluded that, if one took his critique to its logical conclusion, then almost anything would be disqualified from being what the ethics facilitation model aspires and claims to be. Aulisio, M. Arnold, R. M. Youngner, S. J., “Moving the Conversation Forward,” Journal of Clinical Ethics 10, no. 1 (1999): 49–56, at 51.Google Scholar

Dr. William Nelson presentation at the National Ethics Teleconference, Core Competencies for Ethics Consultation, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, May 22, 2002, at 2–3Google Scholar

“To understand fully the business of drawing moral lines, we need to know both where the lines have been placed…and what forces have put them there. Bioethicists have so far been rather good at answering the first question, but less skilled at even noticing that the second question exists.” See Scully, , supra note 70, at 199.Google Scholar

G. O. Gabbard, M. L. Peltz, and COPE Study Group on Boundary Violations, “Speaking the Unspeakable: Institutional Reactions to Boundary Violations by Training Analysts,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 49, no. 2 (2001): 659–673; Blos, P., “Silence: A Clinical Exploration,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 41, no. 3 (1972): 348–363; Kurtz, S. A., “On Silence,” Psychoanalytic Review 71, no. 2 (1984): 227–245; Meissner, W. W., “On Analytic Listening,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 69, no. 2 (2000): 317–367, at 347–351; Gans, J. S. Counselman, E. F., “Silence in Group Psychotherapy: A Powerful Communication,” International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 50, no. 1 (2000): 71–86; Millenson, M. L., “The Silence,” Health Affairs 22, no. 2 (2003): 103–112; Henriksen, K. Dayton, E., “Organizational Silence and Hidden Threats to Patient Safety,” Health Services Research 41, no. 4 (2006): 1539–1554; Jones, T. R., “Speak No Evil: Physician Silence in the Face of Professional Impropriety,” Journal of the American Medical Association 276, no. 9 (1996): 753–754; see also, Baylis, F., “The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?” Journal of Medical Ethics 30, no. 1 (2004): 44–49 (arguing that silence can be morally significant). According to Gans and Counselman, “Silence, like speaking, is the result of a decision. People decide whether or not to talk.” Gans and Counselman, id., at 72. Thus, silence can be a form of resistance that must be worked through, be the result of “narcissistic mortification,” or the signifier of a topic that a group would rather avoid. Id., at 73, 77, 82. To the same effect, silence can denote the absence of a thorough discussion of what happens if one does not respond appropriately to a matter that needs to be addressed, in which case “awkward facts swallowed up by the ‘memory hole’ become as if they had never existed at all.” Id. (Millenson), at 104. Just as there are and can be times when a cigar is just a cigar, there are and can be times when silence is simply silence. But because “silence can be as expressive and as defensive, as meaningful and as meaningless, as generous and as begrudging as the spoken word.” Id. (Gans and Counselman), at 85, one must understand the phenomenon in order to make sense of it. Hence, while silence can and often does denote resistance, one should never forget that “assessing the quality of silence is slippery business.” Id. (Meissner), at 348; see also, Katz, (The Silent World), supra note 57, at 28–29, 199.Google Scholar

Gifford, F., “So-Called ‘Clinical Equipoise’ and the Argument from Design,’” Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 32, no. 2 (2007): 135–150, at 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, C. H. Spencer, S. P. Zanna, M. P. et al., “Secure and Defensive High Self-Esteem,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85, no. 5 (2003): 969–978; Stucke, T. S. Sporer, S. L., “When a Grandiose Self-Image Is Threatened: Narcissism and Self-Concept Clarity as Predictors of Negative Emotions and Aggression Following Ego-Threat,” Journal of Personality 70, no. 4 (2002): 509–632; Maldonado, J. L., “Narcissistic Resistances in the Analytic Experience,” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 80, pt. 6 (1999): 1131–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See VHA National Ethics Committee, supra note 1, at 3 (citing Roberts, L.W. Battaglia, J. Epstein, R. S., “Frontier Ethics: Mental Health Care Needs and Ethical Dilemmas in Rural Communities,” Psychiatric Services 50, no. 4 [1999]: 497–503).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Howe, , supra note 96, at 21.Google Scholar

Smith, H. F., “Countertransference, Conflictual Listening, and the Analytic Object Relationship,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48, no. 1 (2000): 95–127; Sandler, J., “Countertransference and Role-Responsiveness,” International Review of Psychoanalysis 3, no. 1 (1976): 43–47; Parsons, M., “The Analyst's Countertransference to the Psychoanalytic Process,” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87, pt. 6 (2006): 1183–1198; Gabbard, G. O., “Countertransference: The Emerging Common Ground,” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 76, pt. 3 (1995): 475–486; Gabbard, G. O., “A Contemporary Psychoanalytic Model of Countertransference,” Journal of Clinical Psychology 57, no. 8 (2001): 983–991; see also, Katz, (The Silent World), supra note 57, at 142–150; Katz, J., “Disclosure and Consent in Psychiatric Practice: Mission Impossible?” in Hofling, C. K., ed., Law and Ethics in the Practice of Psychiatry (New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1981): 91–117, at 109–111.Google Scholar

Levinson, E. A., “Aspects of Self-revelation and Self-disclosure,” Contemporary Psychoanalysis 32, no. 2 (1996): 237–248; Levine, S. S., “Nothing but the Truth: Self-disclosure, Self-revelation, and the Persona of the Analyst,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 55, no. 1 (2007): 81–104; Jacobs, T., “On the Question of Self-disclosure by the Analyst: Error or Advance in Technique?” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 68, no. 2 (1999): 159–183; Renik, O., “The Ideal of the Anonymous Analyst and the Problem of Self-disclosure,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 64, no. 3 (1995): 466–495; Meissner, W. W., “The Problem of Self-disclosure in Psychoanalysis,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 50, no. 3 (2002): 827–867; Dixon, L. Adler, D. Braun, D. et al., “Reexamination of Therapist Self-disclosure,” Psychiatric Services 52, no. 11 (2001): 1489–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shill, M. A., “Analytic Neutrality, Anonymity, Abstinence, and Elective Self-disclosure,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 52, no. 1 (2004): 151–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, R., “Finding the Neutral Position: Patient and Analyst Perspectives,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48, no. 1 (2000): 129–153; Renik, O., “The Perils of Neutrality,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65, no. 3 (1996): 495–517; Franklin, G., “The Multiple Meanings of Neutrality,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 38, no. 1 (1990): 195–220; Shapiro, T., “On Neutrality,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 32, no. 2 (1984): 269–282; Poland, W. S., “On the Analyst's Neutrality,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 32, no. 2 (1984): 283–299; Hoffer, A., “Toward a Definition of Psychoanalytic Neutrality,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 33, no. 4 (1985): 771–795; Apfelbaum, B., “Interpretive Neutrality,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 53, no. 3 (2005): 917–943.Google Scholar

Kernberg, O. F., “The Analyst's Authority in the Psychoanalytic Situation,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65, no. 1 (1996): 137–157; Tuch, R. H., “Questioning the Psychoanalyst's Authority,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 49, no. 2 (2001): 491–513; Havens, L., “The Risks of Knowing and Not Knowing,” Journal of Social & Biological Structures 5, no. 3 (1982): 213–222.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, R. S., The Talking Cures: The Psychoanalyses and the Psychotherapies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995); Stone, L., The Psychoanalytic Situation: An Examination of Its Development and Essential Nature (New York: International Universities Press, Inc., 1961); Aron, L., A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis (Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, 1996); see also, Kelly, K. V., “Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Therapies,” in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, supra note 6, at 2132–2138.Google Scholar

Klugman, C. M., “As Advisors, Nondirectional Consultation Is Best,” American Journal of Bioethics 5, no. 5 (September-October 2005): 56–57; Kessler, S., “The Genetic Counselor as Psychotherapist,” Birth Defects Original Article Series 15, no. 2 (1979): 187–200; see also, Kenen, R. H., “Genetic Counseling: The Development of a New Interdisciplinary Occupational Field,” Social Science and Medicine 18, no. 7 (1984): 541–549; Biesecker, B. B., “Future Directions in Genetic Counseling: Practical and Ethical Considerations,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8, no. 2 (1998): 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poland, W. S., “The Interpretive Attitude,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 50, no. 3 (2002): 807–826; Cooper, S. H., “Interpretive Fallibility and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 41, no. 1 (1993): 95–126; Kantrowitz, J. L., “The Analyst's Style and Its Impact on the Analytic Process: Overcoming a Patient-analyst Stalemate,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 40, no. 1 (1992): 169–194; Hoffman, I. Z., “The Intimate and Ironic Authority of the Psychoanalyst's Presence,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65, no. 1 (1996): 102–136; Kernberg, O. F., “The Analyst's Authority in the Psychoanalytic Situation,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65, no. 1 (1996): 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See, Gruenberg, P. B., “Boundary Violations,” in the American Psychiatric Association, Ethics Primer (Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 2001): 1–9; Gabbard, G. O., “Boundary Violations,” in Bloch, S. Chodoff, P. Green, S. A., eds., Psychiatric Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999): 141–160; Hundert, E. M. Appelbaum, P. S., “Boundaries in Psychotherapy: Model Guidelines,” Psychiatry 58, no. 4 (1995): 345–356; Radden, J., “Notes towards a Professional Ethics for Psychiatry,” Australia-New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36, no. 1 (2002): 52–59; Malone, S. B. Reed, M. R. Norbeck, J. et al., “Development of a Training Module on Therapeutic Boundaries for Mental Health Clinicians and Case Managers,” Lippincott's Case Management 9, no. 4 (2004): 197–202; Mohamed, M. Punwani, M. Clay, M. et al., “Protecting the Residency Training Environment: A Resident's Perspective on Ethical Boundaries in the Faculty-Resident Relationship,” Academic Psychiatry 29, no. 4 (2005): 368–373.Google Scholar

Aulisio, M., “Common Themes and Disputed Questions from the Literature Review and Essay Exercise,” speech presented at the SHHV-SBC Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation, December 13, 1996, at 1.Google Scholar

Aulisio, M., “Minutes of Meeting Three,” SHHV-SBC Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation, February 28- March 1, 1997, at 4.Google Scholar

Id.; see also, Baylis, F. Brody, H., “The Importance of Character for Ethics Consultants,” in Aulisio, Arnold, Youngner, , Ethics Consultation, supra note 67, 37–44, at 40–42.Google Scholar

Aulisio, M., “Minutes of Meeting Four,” SHHV-SBC Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation, May 30–31, 1997, at 5.Google Scholar

See Aulisio, , supra, note 25, at 5.Google Scholar

Id., at 6.Google Scholar

“Psychiatrists Expel ‘Captain Ethics,’” Washington Post, December 23, 1992, at A4; “‘Capt. Ethics’ Thrown out by Psychiatrists,” Cleveland Plain Dealer, December 23, 1992, at A6; “Medical Ethicist Dr. Charles Culver Expelled by Psychiatric Association,” Union Leader, December 22, 1992, at 4; “Psychiatrist Disciplined for Alleged Affair,” Las Vegas ReviewJournal, December 23, 1992, at 5A; “Culver Calls Expulsion ‘Totally Absurd,’” Union Leader, December 26, 1992, at 5; see also, Culver, C. M., “Should We Research Doctor-Patient Sex?” IRB 3, no. 5 (May 1981): 7–8; Riskin, L. L., “IRB Review of Psychotherapist-Patient Sexual Relations,” IRB 3, no. 10 (December 1981): 7–8; Otten, A. L., “Medical Aid: Ethics Experts Help More Doctors Handle Hard Moral Decisions,” The Wall Street Journal, March 6, 1987, at section 1, page 1. There are no names for the expulsion stories, as it was picked up by the AP Wire Service on December 22,.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Aulisio, , supra note 25, at 2–3.Google Scholar

Goode, W. J., “The Protection of the Inept,” American Sociological Review 32, no. 1 (1967): 5–19; Thompson, J. B., Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc., 2000): At 11–30.Google Scholar

See Dubler, Blustein, , supra note 20, at 35.Google Scholar

Id. (Emphasis added.)Google Scholar

Shalit, R., “When We Were Philosopher Kings,” New Republic, April 28, 1997, 24–28, at 26.Google Scholar

See, for example, McCullough, L. B., “Preventive Ethics, Professional Integrity, and Boundary Setting: The Clinical Management of Moral Uncertainty,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20, no. 1 (1995): 1–11; Furrow, L. Arnold, R. M. Parker, L. S., “Preventive Ethics: Expanding the Horizions of Clinical Ethics,” Journal of Clinical Ethics 4, no. 4 (1993): 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Dubler, Blustein, , supra note 20, at 35.Google Scholar

See King, , supra note 19, at 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreno, J., “Ethics Committees: Beyond Benign Neglect,” Healthcare Ethics Committee Forum 18, no. 4 (2006): 368–369.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, D. Tarzian, A. O'Neil, J. A., “Are Ethics Committee Members Competent to Consult?” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28, no. 1 (2000): 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Thornton, B. C. Callahan, D. Nelson, J. L., “Bioethics Education: Expanding the Circle of Participants,” Hastings Center Report 23, no. 1 (January-February 1993): 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, R. Pearlman, R. Taylor, H. Kipnis, K., Report and Recommendations of the ASBH Advisory Committee on Ethics Standards, undated, at 13. (Emphasis added)Google Scholar

Schudson, M., “The Trouble with Experts – and Why Democracies Need Them,” Theory and Society 35, nos. 5–6 (2006): 491–506, at 500. On the debate itself, see, for example, Rasmussen, L., ed., Ethics Expertise: History, Contemporary Perspectives and Applications (Dordrecht, NL: Springer, 2006); Yoder, S. D., “The Nature of Ethical Expertise,” Hastings Center Report 28, no. 6 (November-December 1998): 11–19; Agich G. J., “Ethics Expert Testimony: Against the Skeptics,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22, no. 4 (1997): 381–403; Noble, C. N., “Ethics and Experts,” Hastings Center Report 12, no. 3 (May-June, 1982): 7–9; Nielsen, K., “On Being Skeptical about Applied Ethics,” in Ackerman, T. F. Graber, G. C. Reynolds, C. H. et al., eds., Clinical Medical Ethics: Exploration and Assessment (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987): 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See VHA National Ethics Committee, supra note 1, at 3, 9.Google Scholar

Scofield, G. R., “Ethics Consultation: The Least Dangerous Profession?” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2, no. 4 (1993): 417–426, at 417.Google Scholar

Callahan, D., “Bioethics as a Discipline,” Studies of the Hastings Center 1, no. 1 (1973): 66–73, at 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar