Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T06:13:31.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Ethics and Misguided Moral Intuition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Franklin G. Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term therapeutic misconception was coined by Paul Appelbaum and his colleagues to describe the tendency of patients enrolled in clinical trials to confuse research participation with the personal clinical attention characteristic of medical care. It has not been recognized that an analogous therapeutic misconception pervades ethical thinking about clinical research with patient-subjects. Investigators and bioethicists often judge the ethics of clinical research based on ethical standards appropriate to the physician-patient relationship in therapeutic medicine. This ethical approach to clinical research constitutes a misconception because it fails to appreciate the ethically significant differences between clinical research and clinical care.

In this article I argue that the assumption that the ethical principles governing the practice of therapeutic medicine should also apply to clinical research with patient- subjects produces incoherence in research ethics and erroneous guidance concerning certain controversial research designs.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , Spring 2004 , pp. 111 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appelbaum, P.S. et al. , “False Hopes and Best Data: Consent to Research and the Therapeutic Misconception,” Hastings Center Report 17, no. 2 (1987): 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Medical Association, “Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects,” JAMA 284 (2000): 3043–3045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, R.J., Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research, 2nd edition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986): At 8–10.Google Scholar
See Freedman, B. Glass, K.C. Weijer, C., “Placebo Orthodoxy in Clinical Research II: Ethical, Legal, and Regulatory Myths,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 24 (1996): 252–259; and Beauchamp, T.L. Childress, J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York:Oxford University Press, 2001): at 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Clark, P.A., “Placebo Surgery for Parkinson’s Disease: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30 (2002): 58–68; and Weijer, C., “I Need a Placebo Like I Need a Hole in the Head,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30 (2002): 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Emanuel, E.J. Miller, F.G., “The Ethics of Placebo-Controlled Trials — A Middle Ground,” N. Engl. J. Med. 345 (2001): 915–919;Horng, S. Miller, F.G., “Is Placebo Surgery Unethical?”N. Engl. J. Med. 347 (2002): 137–139;Miller, F.G. Rosenstein, D.L., “Psychiatric Symptom-Provoking Studies: An Ethical Appraisal,”Biological Psychiatry42 (1997): 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, J.B. et al. , “A Controlled Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee,” N. Engl. J. Med. 347 (2002): 81–88.Google Scholar
Rassovsky, Y. Kushner, M.G., “Carbon Dioxide in the Study of Panic Disorder: Issues of Definition, Methodology, and Outcome,” Journal of Anxiety Disorders 17 (2003): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kekes, J., “Moral Intuition,” American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1986): 83–93.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L. Childress, J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Beecher, H.K., “Ethics and Clinical Research,” N. Engl. J. Med. 274 (1966): 1354–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, E.J. Wendler, D. Grady, C., “What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?” JAMA 283 (2000): 2701–2711.Google Scholar
Ackerman, T.F., “Therapeutic Beneficence and Placebo Controls,” American Journal of Bioethics 2, no. 2 (2002): 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, F.G. Rosenstein, D.L. DeRenzo, E.G., “Professional Integrity in Clinical Research,” JAMA 280 (1998): 1449–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar