Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:28:26.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preemption and the Obesity Epidemic: State and Local Menu Labeling Laws and the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Worldwide, obesity has become a major cause of preventable death, disease, and disability. While the epidemic of obesity is a significant public health issue in many developed nations, the United States has the highest prevalence of obesity among adults and children internationally. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) estimates that over 60 percent of U.S. adults are overweight or obese. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “overweight” refers to adults whose body mass index (BMI), a number calculated using weight and height measurements, is between 25 and 29.9. “Obese” refers to adults whose BMI is 30 or higher. Among American children and adolescents, approximately 17 percent are overweight.

Type
Independent
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and Obesity, 2001, at 15; Brownell, K. D., “The Chronicling of Obesity: Growing Awareness of Its Social, Economic, and Political Contexts,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 30, no. 5 (2005): 955964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Obesity Still a Major Problem, April 14, 2006, available at <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/06facts/obesity03_04.htm> (last visited October 3, 2008); Koplan, J. P., Liverman, C. T. and Kraak, V. I., Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005): at 22; id. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services), at 15.Google Scholar
Id. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services), at 10.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Defining Overweight and Obesity, May 22, 2007, available at <http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/defining.htm> (last visited October 3, 2008).+(last+visited+October+3,+2008).>Google Scholar
Ogden, C. L. et al., “Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999–2004,” JAMA 295, no. 13 (2006): 15491555, at 1550.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Healthy People,” available at <http://www.healthypeople.gov/> (last visited October 3, 2008).+(last+visited+October+3,+2008).>Google Scholar
Wang, Y. and Beydoun, M. A., “The Obesity Epidemic in the United States — Gender, Age, Socioeconomic, Racial/Ethnic, and Geographic Characteristics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis,” Epidemiologic Reviews 29, no. 1 (2007): 628, at 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashe, M., Feldstein, L. M. and Graff, S. et al., “Local Venues for Change: Legal Strategies for Healthy Environments,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 1 (2007): 138147.Google Scholar
Center for Science in the Public Interest, Nutrition Labeling at Fast-Food and Other Chain Restaurants, available at <http://www.cspinet.org/nutritionpolicy/Nutrition_Labeling_Fast_Food.pdf> (last visited October 3, 2008); Brownell, K. D., “Fast Food and Obesity in Children,” Pediatrics 113, no. 1 (2004): 132.CrossRef+(last+visited+October+3,+2008);+Brownell,+K.+D.,+“Fast+Food+and+Obesity+in+Children,”+Pediatrics+113,+no.+1+(2004):+132.>Google Scholar
Id. (Center for Science in the Public Interest).Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Calories Count: Report of the Working Group on Obesity,” March 12, 2004, available at <http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼dms/owg-toc.html> (last visited October 3, 2008).+(last+visited+October+3,+2008).>Google Scholar
Lando, A. M. and Labiner-Wolfe, J., “Helping Consumers Make More Healthful Food Choices: Consumer Views on Modifying Food Labels and Providing Point-of-Purchase Nutrition Information at Quick-service Restaurants,” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 39, no. 3 (2007): 157163, at 162–63; Center for Science in the Public Interest, Summary of Polls Related to Menu Labeling, available at <http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/census_menu_board_question.pdf> (last visited October 3, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, supra note 1, at 17; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, supra note 11; Koplan, , Liverman, and Kraak, , supra note 2, at 166.Google Scholar
U.S. Constitution, art. VI.Google Scholar
Teret, S. P., DeFrancesco, S. and Bailey, L. A., “Gun Deaths and Home Rule: A Case for Local Regulation of a Local Public Health Problem,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 9, Supplement 1 (1993): 4446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 535 U.S. 525 (2001).Google Scholar
Teret, S. P., “Litigating for the Public's Health,” American Journal of Public Health 76, no. 8 (1986): 10271029.Google Scholar
Vernick, J. S. et al., “Role of Litigation in Preventing Product-Related Injuries,” Epidemiologic Reviews 25, no. 25 (2003): 9098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 999 (2008).Google Scholar
Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 529 U.S. 861 (2000).Google Scholar
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).Google Scholar
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51 (2002).Google Scholar
Fribush, R. S., “Putting Calorie and Fat Counts on the Table: Should Mandatory Nutritional Disclosure Laws Apply to Restaurant Foods?” George Washington Law Review 73, no. 2 (2005): 377394.Google Scholar
Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, “Menu Labeling Laws,” available at <http://www.yalerud-dcenter.org/what/law/topics_food_menu.html> (last visited October 3, 2008); see U.S. Food and Drug Administration, supra note 11; Koplan, , Liverman, and Kraak, , supra note 2.+(last+visited+October+3,+2008);+see+U.S.+Food+and+Drug+Administration,+supra+note+11;+Koplan,+,+Liverman,+and+Kraak,+,+supra+note+2.>Google Scholar
Wootan, M. G. and Osborn, M., “Availability of Nutrition Information from Chain Restaurants in the United States,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 30, no. 3 (2006): 266268, at 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootan, M. G., Osborn, M. and Malloy, C. J., “Availability of Point-of-Purchase Nutrition Information at a Fast-Food Restaurant,” Preventive Medicine 43, no. 6 (2006): 458459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at 459.Google Scholar
See Wootan, , Osborn, and Malloy, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
Center for Science in the Public Interest, “Subway First to List Calories on Menu Boards in Country,” July 9, 2007, available at <http://www.cspinet.org/new/200707091.html> (last visited October 3, 2008).+(last+visited+October+3,+2008).>Google Scholar
Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, Public Law No. 101–535, 104 Stat. 2353 (1990) (codified in part at 21 U.S.C. §§ 343[i], [q] and [r]).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(q) (2008); see generally McCann, M. A., “Economic Efficiency and Consumer Choice Theory in Nutritional Labeling,” Wisconsin Law Review 2004, no. 4 (2004): 11611244, at 1187–1198.Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(q)(5).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(r).Google Scholar
See Wootan, and Osborn, , supra note 25, at 267.Google Scholar
S 2784, 110th Cong. (2008).Google Scholar
HR 3895, 110th Cong. (2007).Google Scholar
S 2784; HR 3895.Google Scholar
S 1342, 110th Cong. (2007).Google Scholar
HR 2633, 110th Cong. (2007).Google Scholar
S 3484, 109th Cong. (2006); HR 5563, 109th Cong. (2006); S 2108, 108th Cong. (2004); HR 3444, 108th Cong. (2003).Google Scholar
The Public Health Law & Policy Program has developed a model menu labeling ordinance that can serve as a reference for states and localities. Public Health Law & Policy, Model California Ordinance Requiring Menu Labeling at Chain Restaurants (with Annotations), November 2007.Google Scholar
Center for Science in the Public Interest, Nutrition Labeling in Chain Restaurants: State and Local Bills/Regulations 2007, 2008, available at <http://www.cspinet.org/nutritionpolicy/MenuLabelingBills2007–2008.pdf> (last visited October 3, 2008); “New York City Brings Back Menu Labeling,” The Nation's Health, March 2008, at 10; Menu Labeling at Chain Restaurants, Ord. No. 195–08 (San Francisco 2008).+(last+visited+October+3,+2008);+“New+York+City+Brings+Back+Menu+Labeling,”+The+Nation's+Health,+March+2008,+at+10;+Menu+Labeling+at+Chain+Restaurants,+Ord.+No.+195–08+(San+Francisco+2008).>Google Scholar
New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 2008 WL 1752455 (S.D.N.Y. 2008); New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 509 F.Supp.2d 351 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).Google Scholar
Allday, E., “S.F. Supes Require Posting of Nutrition Info,” San Francisco Chronicle, March 12, 2008.Google Scholar
Public Health, Seattle & King County, Nutrition Menu Labeling in King County, available at <http://www.metrokc.gov/health/boh/reg0802.pdf> (last visited Oct. 9, 2008).+(last+visited+Oct.+9,+2008).>Google Scholar
E.g., Menu Education and Labeling Act, B17–0139 (District of Columbia 2007), available at <http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/images/00001/20070309121159.pdf> (last visited October 3, 2008).+(last+visited+October+3,+2008).>Google Scholar
E.g., Chicago City Council, Nutrition Labeling of Food at Certain Retail Food Establishments, available at <http://www.chicityclerk.com/citycouncil/journals/121306meeting/17NewBusiness/pgs95762–95811.pdf> (last visited October 7, 2008).+(last+visited+October+7,+2008).>Google Scholar
E.g., SB 1436 (Arizona 2007), available at <http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/48leg/1r/bills/sb1436p.htm> (last visited October 7, 2008).+(last+visited+October+7,+2008).>Google Scholar
E.g., Bill No. 19–07 (Montgomery County, Maryland 2007), available at <http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/council/pdf/bill/2007/19–07.pdf> (last visited October 7, 2008).+(last+visited+October+7,+2008).>Google Scholar
See Public Health, Seattle & King County, supra note 48.Google Scholar
Bill No. 19–07 (Montgomery County, Maryland 2007), supra note 53.Google Scholar
See Public Health, Seattle & King County, supra note 48.Google Scholar
E.g., Bill No. 070153 (Philadelphia, PA 2007), available at <http://webapps.phila.gov/council/attachments/4243.pdf> (last visited October 7, 2008); see Barron, J., “5 Restaurants in Manhattan Get Citations Over Calories,” New York Times, May 6, 2008.+(last+visited+October+7,+2008);+see+Barron,+J.,+“5+Restaurants+in+Manhattan+Get+Citations+Over+Calories,”+New+York+Times,+May+6,+2008.>Google Scholar
U.S. Constitution, art. VI.Google Scholar
Hodge, J. G. Jr., “The Role of New Federalism and Public Health Law,” Journal of Law and Health 12, no. 2 (1998): 309357.Google Scholar
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 485 (1996).Google Scholar
Gostin, L. O., Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000): At 48; U.S. Constitution, amend. X; e.g., Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218, 230 (1947). The U.S. Supreme Court, however, recently explained that a state law's public health purpose is not enough to save the law from being preempted by a federal law when Congress has the power to act and its intent to preempt is clear. Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transp. Assn., 128 S.Ct. 989 (2008); Yost, P., “Court Invalidates Maine Tobacco Law,” Washington Post, Feb. 20, 2008.Google Scholar
16 C.F.R. §§ 1203.1 to .17, .30 to .34, .40 to .41, .51 to .53 (2008).Google Scholar
O'Reilly, J. T., Federal Preemption of State and Local Law (Chicago: American Bar Association, 2006): at 23.Google Scholar
See Pursley, G. B., “Rationalizing Complete Preemption After Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson: A New Rule, A New Justification,” Drake Law Review 54, no. 2 (2006): 371472, at 385.Google Scholar
Ausness, R. C., “Preemption of State Tort Law by Federal Safety Statutes: Supreme Court Preemption Jurisprudence,” Kentucky Law Journal 92, no. 4 (2003–2004): 913977, at 969.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, E., Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, 2nd ed. (New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc., 2d ed. 2002): at 380.Google Scholar
See O'Reilly, , supra note 65, at 52.Google Scholar
Id., at 54.Google Scholar
Davis, M. J., “The Battle Over Implied Preemption: Products Liability and the FDA,” Boston College Law Review 48, no. 5 (2007): 10891154, at 1092.Google Scholar
See O'Reilly, , supra note 65, at 62–63.Google Scholar
See Chemerinsky, , supra note 68, at 384–385.Google Scholar
Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218, 230 (1947).Google Scholar
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 999 (2008).Google Scholar
See Chemerinsky, , supra note 68, at 390–91.Google Scholar
Id., at 391.Google Scholar
See O'Reilly, , supra note 65, at 72.Google Scholar
E.g., Gade v. National Solid Waste Management Association, 505 U.S. 88, 98 (1992).Google Scholar
See O'Reilly, , supra note 65, at 75.Google Scholar
See Chemerinsky, , supra note 68, at 398.Google Scholar
529 U.S. 861 (2000).Google Scholar
See generally, Diller, P., “Intrastate Preemption,” Boston University Law Review 87, no. 5 (2007): 11131176.Google Scholar
Dillon's rule is named for John Dillon, a 19th-century Iowa state court judge. Dillon published several treatises on local government law. His writings explain the theories behind what is now known as Dillon's rule. Barron, D. J., “Reclaiming Home Rule,” Harvard Law Review 116, no. 8 (2003): 22552386, at 2285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briffault, R., “Our Localism: Part I — The Structure of Local Government Law,” Columbia Law Review 90, no. 1 (1990): 1115, at 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluestein, F. S., “Do North Carolina Local Governments Need Home Rule?” North Carolina Law Review 84, no. 6 (2006): 19832029, at 2011.Google Scholar
See Briffault, , supra note 86, at 9.Google Scholar
Barron, D. J. and Frug, G. E., “Defensive Localism: A View of the Field from the Field,” Journal of Law and Politics 21, nos. 2–3 (2005): 261291, at 263.Google Scholar
See Bluestein, , supra note 87, at 1986.Google Scholar
Id., at 1994.Google Scholar
Illinois Constitution, sec. 6.Google Scholar
Washington State Legislature, House Bill Report: ESHB 3160 (February 19, 2008), available at <http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2007–08/Pdf/Bill%20Reports/House/3–160-S.HBR.pdf> (last visited October 7, 2008).+(last+visited+October+7,+2008).>Google Scholar
SB 6659; HB 3160 (Washington 2008).Google Scholar
The amended King County ordinance is discussed in Part II.B. When King County amended its ordinance, it changed the date of its effect from August 1, 2008 to December 1, 2008. The ordinance now applies to chain restaurants with 15 or more locations. It originally applied to restaurants with 10 or more locations. In addition, the amended ordinance only applies to items that remain on a chain restaurant's menu for more than 90 days. The original ordinance applied to items on a chain restaurant's menu for more than 60 days. The amended ordinance does not require restaurants to provide information about trans fats. See Public Health, Seattle & King County, supra note 48.Google Scholar
Ohio Restaurant Association, “Ohio Blocks Local Menu Labeling Authority,” ORA News, January 4, 2008.Google Scholar
HB 217 (Ohio 2008).Google Scholar
HB 1303 (Georgia 2008).Google Scholar
Jones, A. and Lee, E., “Bill Opposing Menu Labeling Goes to Governor,” Atlanta Journal-Constitution, March 27, 2008.Google Scholar
Public Law No. 101–535, 104 Stat. 2353 (1990) (codified in part at 21 U.S.C. §§ 343(i), (q) and (r)).Google Scholar
HR Rep. No. 101–538 (1990); reprinted in 1990 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3337.Google Scholar
Although designed to benefit consumers, the Act provides no mechanism for a private cause of action against entities that sell mislabeled foods. Cohen v. McDonald's Corp., 808 N.E.2d 1, 8 (Ill.App. 2004); see generally Guarino, E. T., “Nutrient Descriptor and Disease Claims for Foods Under the New FDA and USDA Rules,” Food & Drug Law Journal 48, no. 4 (1993): 665674.Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(q) (2008); 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.1–101.9 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(q)(1).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(q)(5).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(a)(4).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(r)(5)Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(r)(1).Google Scholar
21 C.F.R. § 101.13(b).Google Scholar
21 C.F.R. §§ 101.10, 101.13, 101.54–101.65.Google Scholar
Public Citizen, Inc. v. Shalala, 932 F.Supp. 13, 18 (D.D.C. 1996).Google Scholar
Reyes v. McDonald's Corp., 2006 WL 3253579, *4-*7 (N.D.Ill. 2006).Google Scholar
21 C.F.R. § 101.10.Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1, note on Construction.Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(a)(4).Google Scholar
136 Cong. Rec. S16607, S16608 (Oct. 24, 1990).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(a)(5).Google Scholar
See Institute of Medicine, Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1992): at 142–143; Jordan, C., “Preemption and Uniform Enforcement of Food Marketing Regulations,” Food & Drug Law Journal 49, no. 2 (1994): 401-407, at 404.Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343(r)(2)(B).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(b).Google Scholar
21 C.F.R. §§ 101.69, 101.70 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See generally Sullivan, K. M. and Gunther, G., Constitutional Law, 14th ed. (New York: Foundation Press, 2001): At 119171, 234–305.Google Scholar
See notes 114120 and accompanying text.Google Scholar
See U.S. Food and Drug Administration, supra note 11; Koplan, , Liverman, and Kraak, , supra note 2.Google Scholar
509 F.Supp.2d 351 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). For this case, three groups filed briefs as amici, or friends of the court, in support of the New York City Board of Health. These briefs were filed by the following: (1) U.S. Representative Henry Waxman, Public Citizen, Center for Science in the Public Interest et al.; (2) the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University; and (3) a consortium of state and local governments.Google Scholar
509 F.Supp.2d 351, 352–53 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).Google Scholar
New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 2008 WL 1752455 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). For this case, two groups filed briefs as amici, or friends of the court, in support of the New York City Board of Health. These briefs were filed by (1) U.S. Representative Henry Waxman, Public Citizen, Center for Science in the Public Interest et al.; and (2) the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University.Google Scholar
509 F.Supp.2d 351, 353 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at 359.Google Scholar
Id., at 360.Google Scholar
Id., at 361, n.14 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
Id., at 362.Google Scholar
Id., at 363.Google Scholar
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Board of Health Votes to Require Chain Restaurants to Display Calorie Information in New York City, Press Release, January 22, 2008, available at <http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2008/pr008–08.shtml> (last visited October 7, 2008).+(last+visited+October+7,+2008).>Google Scholar
New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 2008 WL 1752455 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).Google Scholar
Brief for Plaintiff at 17, New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health (S.D.N.Y. January 31, 2008).Google Scholar
Id., at 20.Google Scholar
New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 2008 WL 1752455, at *4.Google Scholar
Id., at *4.Google Scholar
Id., at *5.Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(a)(5) (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(a)(4). In April 2008, the FDA provided updated guidance that reinforces this interpretation of the NLEA. Office of Nutrition, Labeling, and Dietary Supplements, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “A Labeling Guide for Restaurants and Other Retail Establishments Selling Away-from-Home Foods,” April 2008, available at <http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼dms/labrguid.html> (last visited October 7, 2008).+(last+visited+October+7,+2008).>Google Scholar
New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 2008 WL 1752455 (S.D.N.Y. 2008); New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 509 F.Supp.2d 351 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).Google Scholar
See notes 114–120 and accompanying text.Google Scholar
New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 509 F.Supp.2d 351, 360–61 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).Google Scholar
Brief for Plaintiff at 18, New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health (S.D.N.Y. January 31, 2008); 21 C.F.R. § 101.13(c) (2008).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(a)(4).Google Scholar
Washington Market Co. v. Hoffman, 101 U.S. 112, 116 (1879) (emphasis added).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(a)(4).Google Scholar
New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health, 2008 WL 1752455, *4-*5 (S.D.N.Y. 2008); see Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd., 350 U.S. 270, 298 (1956).Google Scholar
Brief for Plaintiff at 28–38, New York State Restaurant Association v. New York City Board of Health (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008).Google Scholar
U.S. Constitution, amend. XIV.Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 343–1(a)(4).Google Scholar
E.g., see Public Health Law & Policy, supra note 44.Google Scholar