Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-7g5wt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T22:17:57.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Malpractice: Ruling on State-Agent Immunity Overturned in Alabama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Neeta Toprani
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Spring 2001 , pp. 109 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wimpee v. Stella, 2000 WL 1234399 (Ala. 2000).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Ex parte Cranman, 2000 WL 772850, 23 (Ala. 2000).Google Scholar
Specifically, the court in Cranman determined that the physician is protected by the doctrine of state-agent immunity only when his or her actions involve (1) formulating plans or policies, (2) exercising judgment in the administration of a department or agency of government, or (3) discharging duties imposed by statute, rule, or regulation. Id. at 11.Google Scholar