Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:34:39.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Implications of Discrimination in Medical Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jessamyn S. Berniker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent medical studies have indicated that medical professionals discriminate in their treatment practices on the basis of race and gender. Among the many concerns stemming from this realization are questions about the possibility of legal actions and the availability of individual compensation for the denial of equal care. By meeting legal evidentiary standards, the recent statistical data pointing to discriminatory trends have created the potential for legal recourse through Title VI of the Civil Rights Act which prohibits recipients of federal funding from treating people differently on the basis of race or national origin.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , Spring 2000 , pp. 85 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See Barnes, M. Weiner, E., “Evidence of Race-Based Discrimination Triggers New Legal and Ethical Scrutiny,” Health Law Reporter (Bureau of National Affairs) 8 (1999): 1984.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 2000d.Google Scholar
See Schulman, K.A., “The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization,” N Engl J Med 340 (1999): 618, (indicating that some combination of race and gender of patients affects the way physicians treat them); Ayanian, J.Z., “The Effect of Patients' Preferences on Racial Differences in Access to Renal Transplantation,” N Engl J Med 341 (1999): 1661, (indicating that although the inclinations of end-stage renal disease patients regarding renal transplantations differ with race, differences in access to transplantations go beyond these different inclinations); Bach, P.B., “Racial Differences in the Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer,” N Engl J Med 341 (1999): 1198, (indicating that lower survival rates among African-American patients with early-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer is due to the lower rate of surgical treatment among African-Americans even though post-surgery success rates are similar between African-Americans and Caucasians); Dries, D.L., “Racial Differences in the Outcome of Left Ventricular Dysfunction,” N Engl J Med 340 (1999): 609, (indicating that African-Americans with mild-to-moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction appear to be at higher risk for progression of heart failure and death than similarly treated Caucasians).Google Scholar
Schulman, supra note 3, at 618.Google Scholar
Schwartz, L.M., “Misunderstandings About the Effects of Race and Sex on Physicians' Referrals for Cardiac Catheretization,” N Engl J Med 341 (1999): 279, (explaining that the Schulman study only showed that African-American women had lower rates of referral, but not that African-Americans alone, or women alone had lower rates).Google Scholar
Ayanian, supra note 3, at 1661.Google Scholar
Bach, supra note 3, at 1198.Google Scholar
Dries, supra note 3, at 609.Google Scholar
Bach, supra note 3, at 1204; Dries, supra note 3, at 616.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 2000d.Google Scholar
Barnes, supra note 1, at 1984.Google Scholar
U.S. v. Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr., 736 F.2d 1039, 1042 (5th Cir. 1984).Google Scholar
The meaning of “program” is more limited under the regulations than under Title VI. As used in the regulations it refers only to the specific activities receiving the funding. With respect to Title VI the term has been statutorily extended and applies to the recipient of funding on an institution-wide basis. 42 U.S.C. § 2000d-4a. Therefore, under Title VI if any program within the institution receives funding, all institutional activities are subject to the statute. See Cureton v. NCAA, 198 F.3d 107, 115–116, 119–21 (3rd Cir. 1999).Google Scholar
Id. at 1047–48.Google Scholar
See 45 C.F.R. § 80.3(b).Google Scholar
45 CFR § 80.3(b)(2).Google Scholar
45 CFR § 80.3(b)(6)(i).Google Scholar
Guardians Ass'n v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of N.Y., 463 U.S. 582, 607–08 (1983).Google Scholar
Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287, 293–94 (1985).Google Scholar
Powell v. Ridge, 189 F.3d 387, 397 (3rd Cir. 1999).Google Scholar
Id. at 397–98.Google Scholar
Guardians Ass'n, 463 U.S. at 593–95.Google Scholar
Powell, 189 F.3d at 399; Burton v. City of Belle Glade, 178 F.3d 1175, 1202 (11th Cir. 1999); Sandoval v. Hagan, 197 F.3d 484, 502–07 (11th Cir. 1999).Google Scholar
Guardians Ass'n, 463 U.S. at 607.Google Scholar
U.S. Const, art. I, § 8, cl. 1.Google Scholar
Pennhurst State Sch. v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
Id. at 17.Google Scholar
See Guardians Ass'n, 463 U.S. at 599–600.Google Scholar
20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq.Google Scholar
Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Educ., 526 U.S. 629 (1999).Google Scholar
45 CFR § 80.3(b)(6)(i).Google Scholar
Legislation is currently being introduced in both houses of Congress for the purpose of studying disparities in health care in relation to both race and gender. See H.R. 2391, 106th Cong. (1999); S. 1880, 106th Cong. (1999).Google Scholar
See Cooper-Patrick, L., “Race, Gender, and Partnership in the Patient-Physician Relationship,” JAMA 282 (1999): 583 (levels of patient participation in decisionmaking vary significantly with the race of the patient, and whether or not the doctor is of the same race).Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar