Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:13:53.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperialism, Race, and Therapeutics: The Legacy of Medicalizing the “Colonial Body”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Patricia Barton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The BiDil controversy in America coincides with a renewed interest in the linkages between race and therapeutics, whether in the medical history of the United States itself, or in the colonial world. During the colonial era in South Asia, many anthropological and medical researchers conducted research which compared the European and “colonial” body, contrasting everything from blood composition to brain weight between the races of the Indian Empire. This, as Mark Harrison has shown, was fundamentally a phenomenon of the 19th century, arguing that “[i]t was only after 1800 that racial identities came to be fixed and that India was viewed with terror, as a reservoir of filth and disease.” Racist attitudes in British Indian colonial medicine are not hard to discover. They underpinned, for instance, campaigns to improve the appallingly high maternal and infant mortality rates in which the blame was placed squarely upon the women and the indigenous midwives who delivered them rather than the poverty in which they lived. As such, Peers Dimmock, a professor of gynecology and obstetrics at the Calcutta Medical School, opened his address to the First Indian Medical Congress in 1894 with a diatribe against “the unclean and repulsive traditionary [sic] methods of the native midwives.”

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , Fall 2008 , pp. 506 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See, for instance, Rogers, L., “The Incidence of Typhoid Fever on Civilian Europeans and on Natives in Calcutta and the Importance of Anti-Typhoid Inoculations of all European Immigrants to India,” Indian Medical Gazette 42, no. 8 (August 1907): 291–293; Harvey, W. F. and Acton, H. W., “Blood Characters: Their Variability and Interdependence,” Indian Journal of Medical Research 2, no. 2 (October 1914): 721–732; Acton, H. W. and Chopra, R. N., “Indian Diets in Relationship to Health and Disease,” Indian Medical Gazette 60, no. 7 (July 1925): 341–342; “Service Notes,” Indian Medical Gazette 43, no. 5 (May 1908): 196–197; MacDonald, A., “Estimating Skull Capacity and Brain Weight on Living Persons,” Indian Medical Record 49, no. 12 (December 1929): 693–95.Google Scholar
Harrison, M., Climates and Constitutions: Health, Race, Environment and British Imperialism in India 1600–1850 (New Delhi: OUP, 1999): At v.Google Scholar
Peers Dimmock, H., “Presidential Address,” Proceedings of the First Indian Medical Congress, Calcutta 24th-29th December 1894 (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1895): At 411; Dee, P., “Complete Rupture of Uterus,” Indian Medical Gazette 43, no. 7 (July 1908): 249–251; see Victoria Memorial Scholarship Fund, The Nineteenth Annual Report of the VMSF for the Improvement of Indigenous Dais in India (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1921); it is just one report which emphasizes the superiority of Western over traditional Indian midwifery practices.Google Scholar
See, for example, Sinha, M., Colonial Masculinity: The “Manly Englishman” and the “Effeminate” Bengali in the Late Nineteenth Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
See, for example, Buckingham, J., Leprosy in Colonial South India: Medicine and Confinement (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave, 2002); Ramanna, M., Western Medicine and Public Health in Colonial Bombay, 1845–1895 (Delhi: Orient Longman, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in BMJ vol. i (March 1907).Google Scholar
McCay, D., Banerji, S. C., Dutta, M. M., and Ghosal, L. M., “The Urine and Blood of Bengalis,” Indian Medical Gazette 43, no. 10 (October 1907): 370–373. Emphasis added.Google Scholar
See, for example, McDonald, D., Surgeons Twoe and a Barber: Being Some Account of the Life and Work of the Indian Medical Service, 1600–1947 (London: William Heinemann Medical Books, 1950).Google Scholar
McCay, D., “Standards of the Constituents of the Urine and Blood and the Bearing of the Metabolism of Bengalis on the Problems of Nutrition,” in Scientific Memoirs by Officers of the Medical and Sanitary Departments of the Government of India, new series, no. 34 (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1908): at 1.Google Scholar
Id., at 7–9 and 16–20.Google Scholar
Id., 10–11.Google Scholar
Id., at 32.Google Scholar
Editorial, “The Metabolism of Bengalis,” Indian Medical Gazette 43, no. 9 (September 1908): 344.Google Scholar
See McCay, , supra note 9, at 57.Google Scholar
Id., at 59–60.Google Scholar
Id., at 32.Google Scholar
Lt. Col. H. N. Joubert, “Menstruation in Warm Climates,” at 428–30 and Dass, K. N., “Puerperal Eclampsia,” in supra note 3 (Proceedings), at 433–435.Google Scholar
Rogers, L., “The Incidence of Typhoid Fever on Civilian European and on Natives in Calcutta and the Importance of Anti-Typhoid Inoculation of All European Immigrants to India,” Indian Medical Gazette 42, no. 8 (August 1907): 292.Google Scholar
Buchanan, W. J., Editorial, Indian Medical Gazette 43, no. 1 (January 1908): 20.Google Scholar
Stapleton, G., “Pelvic Measurements in Indian Women,” Indian Medical Gazette 60, no. 12 (December 1925): 560–561.Google Scholar
See, for instance, DeCruz, F. G., “Blackwater Fever in Jeypore Agency,” Indian Medical Gazette 42, no. 11 (November 1907): 403–404.Google Scholar
Nocht, B. and Mayer, M., Malaria: A Handbook of Treatment, Parasitology and Prevention (London: John Bale Medical Publications, 1937): At 30–37.Google Scholar
Rogers, L., Fevers in the Tropics (London: Oxford Medical Publications, 1909): at 252.Google Scholar
Megaw, J. W. D., “A Year's Experience of Malaria at the Outdoor Department of the Medical College Hospital, Calcutta,” Indian Medical Gazette 42, no. 1 (January 1907): 12–13.Google Scholar
Sinton, J. A., “A Suggested Standard Treatment of Malaria based upon the Results of the Controlled Investigation of over 3,700 cases,” Indian Medical Gazette 65, no. 11 (November 1930): 601–603.Google Scholar
Knowles, R. and das Gupta, B. M., “Clinical Studies in Malaria by Cultural and Enumerative Methods,” Indian Medical Gazette 66, no. 1 (January, 1931): 1–10.Google Scholar
Deuskar, V. N., “An Unusual Case of Malaria,” Indian Medical Gazette 60, no. 3 (March 1925): 122–123.Google Scholar
Jones, W. H. S., Ross, R., and Elliot, C. G., Malaria: A Neglected Factor in the History of Greece and Rome (Cambridge: Macmillan and Bowes, 1907): at 54.Google Scholar
Id., at 85.Google Scholar
See Sinha, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
Editorial, “Rural Malaria,” Indian Medical Gazette 76, no. 11 (November 1941): 681.Google Scholar
“Indian Systems of Medicine,” transactions of the First Indian Medical Congress, 1894, at 81.Google Scholar
Id., at 81–82.Google Scholar
Chopra, R. N., Mukerji, B., and Chopra, I. C., A Treatise on Tropical Therapeutics, 2nd ed. (Calcutta: D. N. Dhar & Sons Ltd., 1954): At vii.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. S., “Enteric Fever in the Native Army,” Indian Medical Gazette 43, no. 7 (August 1908): 314–317.Google Scholar
James, S. P., Willmore, W. S., Harvey, W. F., Gloster, T. H., and Dorrell, H. L., “Pyorrhoea Alveolaris and Associated Conditions among Indians and Europeans,” Indian Journal of Medical Research 3, no. 3 (October 1915): 742–762.Google Scholar
Buchanan, W. J., “Medical Education in India,” Indian Medical Gazette 43, no. 4 (April 1908): 141. Editorial on article by Col. Kenneth MacLeod, MD, LL.D, IMS (retired).Google Scholar
Reprinted in the BMJ vol. i (March 1907).Google Scholar
Neild Cook, J., “Infantile Mortality in India,” BMJ vol. ii (July 20, 1907): 172; Editorial, “Infant Mortality in India,” Indian Medical Gazette 42, no. 8 (August 1907): 302–303.Google Scholar
Col. Dudgeon, L. S., “The Effects of Injections of Quinine into the Tissues of Man and Animals,” Journal of Hygiene 19, no. 3 (October 1919) reported in the Indian Medical Gazette 55, no. 2 (February 1920): 63.Google Scholar
SirRogers, Leonard, “Pathological Evidence bearing on Disease Incidence in Calcutta,” Glasgow Medical Journal 78, no. 1 (January-February 1925): 1–21; reprinted in Indian Medical Gazette 60, no. 10 (October 1925): 483–492.Google Scholar
See, for example, Mills, J. H., Cannabis Britannica: Empire, Trade and Prohibition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Tapper, M., In the Blood: Sickle Cell Anemia and the Politics of Race (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).Google Scholar
See Victoria Memorial Scholarship Fund, supra note 3 at 55.Google Scholar
Id., at 5.Google Scholar
Dee, P., “Complete Rupture of Uterus,” Indian Medical Gazette 43, no. 7 (July 1908): 249–251.Google Scholar
Fraser, G. J., African American Midwifery in the South: Dialogues of Birth, Race and Memory (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Lewis, J. H., The Biology of the Negro (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1942): x-xi.Google Scholar
Id., at x.Google Scholar