Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:17:16.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Future of Health Equity in America: Addressing the Legal and Political Determinants of Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Daniel E. Dawes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is much discourse and focus on the social determinants of health, but undergirding these multiple intersecting and interacting determinants are legal and political determinants that have operated at every level and impact the entire life continuum. The United States has long grappled with advancing health equity via public law and policy. Seventy years after the country was founded, lawmakers finally succeeded in passing the first comprehensive and inclusive law aimed at tackling the social determinants of health, but that effort was short-lived. Today the United States is faced with another fork in the road relative to the advancement of health equity. This article draws on lessons from history and law to argue that researchers, providers, payers, lawmakers and the legal community have a moral, economic and national security imperative to address not only the negative outcomes of health disparities, but also the imbalance of inputs resulting from laws and policies which fail to employ an equity lens.

Type
Symposium Articles
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 46 , Issue 4: Next Steps in Health Reform , Winter 2018 , pp. 838 - 840
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dawes, D., 150 Years of ObamaCare (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
HR 51, An Act to establish a Bureau for the Relief of Freed-men and Refugees, was introduced in the second session of the 38th Congress of the United States and signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln on March 3, 1865, a little over one month before he was assassinated.Google Scholar
The World Health Organization in 1985 defined health equity as the notion “that ideally everyone should have a fair opportunity to attain their full health potential and, more pragmatically, that no one should be disadvantaged from achieving this potential.” World Health Organization (1985). Targets for Health for All. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
The Freedmen's Bureau Act struggled to prevail against the political head winds determined to undermine it, and Congress eventually failed to muster the votes to reauthorize the law in 1969 after doing so every year since it was passed, and the Freedmen's Bureau was officially terminated in 1872.Google Scholar
The Disadvantaged Minority Health Improvement Act of 1990 was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush and codified into law programs and policies that were established by the Reagan administration's Secretary of Health and Human Services, Margaret Heckler.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine, Health Care in a Context of Civil Rights (Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences Press, 1981).Google Scholar
D. Dawes, supra note 1.Google Scholar
Colby, S.L. and Ortman, J.M., “Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060,” Current Population Reports (2014), P25–1143, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bacon, F., “Forbes Quotes: Thoughts On The Business Of Life,” available at <https://www.forbes.com/quotes/2913/> (last visited October 16, 2018).+(last+visited+October+16,+2018).>Google Scholar