Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:12:34.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Public Health Law: Three Pillars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Richard J. Jackson  and
Timothy F. Malloy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most people dread being the subject of interest for doctors, scientists, regulators, and lawyers. While we may joke about the arrogance of the medical profession and the aggressiveness of the legal field, both lie at the core of environmental public health (EPH). They are inseparable, sometimes complementary and other times in tension. The role of medicine and science in EPH is clear, but their relationship with law is often opaque. Yet in no other area of public health, from infectious and chronic disease prevention to providing health care in underserved communities, is law so central as an instrument and partner. In this article we explore the relationship of law and science in the broader context of EPH, beginning with an overview of potential goals and challenges. We then offer three organizing principles that inform and guide the integration of law, science and policy in EPH.

Type
JLME Supplement
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 39 , Issue S1 , Spring 2011 , pp. 34 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Institute of Medicine, Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health, Division of Health Care Services, The Future of Public Health (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1988): at 7.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, “Achievements in Public Health, 1900–1999: Control of Infectious Disease,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 48 (1999): 621–629.Google Scholar
Air Quality Management District, The Southland's War on Smog: Fifty Years of Progress toward Cleaner Air, May 1997, available at <http://www.aqmd.gov/news1/Archives/History/marchcov.html> (last visited November 16, 2010). (last visited November 16, 2010).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Air+Quality+Management+District,+The+Southland's+War+on+Smog:+Fifty+Years+of+Progress+toward+Cleaner+Air,+May+1997,+available+at++(last+visited+November+16,+2010).>Google Scholar
Anastas, P. and Warner, J., Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998): at 11.Google Scholar
Malloy, T. F., “Of Natmats, Terrorists, and Toxics: Regulatory Adaptation in a Changing World,” UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 26 (2008): 93–127.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Lichterman, J. et al., “Preventing Toxic Exposures Workplace Lessons in Safer Alternatives,” Perspectives 5, no. 1 (July 2010), available at <http://www.sustainableproduction.org/downloads/PreventingToxicExposure9–10.pdf> (last visited November 16, 2010).Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Summary Health Statistics for US Children: National Health Interview Survey, 2008, Series 10, No. 4 (December 2009), available at <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_244.pdf> (last visited November 16, 2010).+(last+visited+November+16,+2010).>Google Scholar
Wu, F. and Takaro, T. K., “Childhood Asthma and Environmental Interventions,” Environmental Health Perspectives 115 (2007): 971–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeatts, K., Sly, P., and Shore, S. et al., “A Brief Targeted Review of Susceptibility Factors, Environmental Exposures, Asthma Incidence, and Recommendations for Future Asthma Incidence Research,” Environmental Health Perspectives 114 (2006): 634–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, T. F. and Sinsheimer, P., “Innovation, Regulation and the Selection Environment,” Rutgers Law Review 57(2004): 183–233.Google Scholar