Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:53:52.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross Sector Data Sharing: Necessity, Challenge, and Hope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Cason Schmit ,
Kathleen Kelly  and
Jennifer Bernstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Existing data sources have tremendous potential to inform public health activities. However, a patchwork of data protection laws impede data sharing efforts. Nevertheless, a data-sharing initiative in Peoria, IL was able to overcome challenges to set up a cross-sectoral data system to coordinate mental health, law enforcement, and healthcare services.

Type
Symposium Articles
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 47 , Issue S2: 2018 Public Health Law Conference: Health Justice: Empowering Public Health and Advancing Health Equity , Summer 2019 , pp. 83 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organization, WHO Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Public Health Surveillance, 2017, available at <http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/255721/1/9789241512657-eng.pdf> (last visited February 20, 2019).+(last+visited+February+20,+2019).>Google Scholar
Schmit, C., Sunshine, G., Pepin, D., Ramanathan, T., Menon, A., and Penn, M., “Transitioning from Paper to Digital: State Statutory and Regulatory Frameworks for Health Information Technology,” Public Health Reports 132, no. 5 (August 16, 2017): 585-592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See 42 C.F.R. Part 2; 42 U.S.C. §1758(b)(6); 7 C.F.R. §§226.2, 226.23; 7 C.F.R. §§245.2, 245.6; 7 C.F.R. §§225.2, 225.15; 7 C.F.R. §§ 215.2, 215.13a, 245.6; 44 U.S.C. §3501 Note Sec. 501, et al.; 38 C.F.R. §§1.460-1.499; 38 C.F.R. §§17.500-17.511; 34 C.F.R. Part 99; 42 U.S.C. §9801, et seq.; 45 C.F.R. §1303 Subpart C; 45 C.F.R. Part 5b; 34 C.F.R. Part 5b; 45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164; 42 U.S.C. §11360a; 24 C.F.R. §§578.7, 578.57, 578.103; 34 C.F.R. Parts 300 and 303; 42 C.F.R. Part 431, Subpart F; 34 C.F.R. Part 98.; 7 U.S.C. Ch. 51; 7 C.F.R. §272.1; 42 C.F.R Part 59, Subpart A; 38 C.F.R. §§1.500-1.527; 7 U.S.C. §2018; 7 C.F.R. §246.26.Google Scholar
7 C.F.R. §245.2.Google Scholar
Munetz, M. R., and Griffin, P. A., “Use of the Sequential Intercept Model as an Approach to Decriminalization of People With Serious Mental Illness,” Psychiatric Services 57, no. 4 (April 2006): 544-549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar