No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
WHY DOES RELIGIOUS ESTABLISHMENT NEED TO JUSTIFY ITSELF?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2018
Abstract
- Type
- Symposium Introduction
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University 2018
References
1 Ahdar, Rex & Leigh, Ian, Religious Freedom in the Liberal State 152 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Hirschl, Ran, Constitutional Theocracy 76 (2010)Google Scholar.
3 Id. at 1. On the development of a “generic constitutional law” that is traded from one legal order to the other, see Law, David, Generic Constitutional Law, 89 Minnesota Law Review 652, 742 (2005)Google Scholar.
4 On the concept of “constitutional dismemberment,” see Albert, Richard, Constitutional Amendment and Dismemberment, 43 Yale Journal of International Law 1, 84 (2018)Google Scholar.
5 Lautsi v. Italy, 54 European Court of Human Rights Reporter 3 (2012).
6 Robertson, Roland, Globalization, Politics, and Religion, in The Changing Face of Religion 19 (Beckford, James A. & Luckmann, Thomas eds., 1989)Google Scholar; Faraguna, Pietro, Constitutional Identity in the EU—A Shield or a Sword?, 18 German Law Journal 1617, 1618 (2018)Google Scholar.
7 The literature in this field is legion. Among the most recent volumes, see Patrick Deneen, Why Liberalism Failed (2018).
8 Luce, Edward, The Retreat of Western Liberalism 13 (2017)Google Scholar.
9 Law, supra note 3, at 660.
10 Waldron, Jeremy, Partly Laws Common to All Mankind 28 (2012)Google Scholar.