Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:17:27.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STRICT SCRUTINY, COMPELLING STATE INTERESTS, AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM - The Distinctiveness of Religion in American Law: Rethinking Religion Clause Jurisprudence. By Kathleen A. Brady. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. 354. $39.99 (paper). ISBN: 978-1107016507.

Review products

The Distinctiveness of Religion in American Law: Rethinking Religion Clause Jurisprudence. By Kathleen A. Brady. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. 354. $39.99 (paper). ISBN: 978-1107016507.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2018

Michael P. Moreland
Michael P. Moreland*
Affiliation:
University Professor of Law and Religion, Villanova University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

religion clausesfree exerciseestablishmentneutrality
Type
Book Review Roundtable
Information
Journal of Law and Religion , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 510 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

27 Fallon, Richard, “Strict Judicial Scrutiny,” UCLA Law Review 54, no. 5 (2007): 1267–338Google Scholar.

28 For another effort to capture the tiers of scrutiny by metaphor, see Paulsen, Michael Stokes, “Medium Rare Scrutiny,” Constitutional Commentary 15, no. 3 (1998): 397–402Google Scholar.

29 Gunther, Gerald, “The Supreme Court, 1971 Term—Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection,” Harvard Law Review 86, no. 1 (1972): 1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 8.

30 Fallon, “Strict Judicial Scrutiny,” 1321.