Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T17:26:01.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Gentleman Who Was Thursday

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

Extract

When Marie Failinger and I began to play with metaphors as we talked about the scroll to honor Tom Shaffer, well, we did consider and discard some. From that heap of castoffs, I want to begin big and tell you the clearest discard, the biggest miss: Tom as a peach of a man. The positive side of the image is roundness as an indicator of wholeness, of even feminine circularity, of integrity. The down side of roundness need not be spelled out in detail (and we certainly do not want to suggest fuzziness)… but there is that one lingering wild hare, the peach's suggestion of the Southern gentleman, that Atticus Finch or Walker Percy who never quite migrates into the contemporary scene. That Southern gentry anomaly is central to Tom, and the struggle with how he can almost redeem the notion of lawyer as gentleman is for me the story of Tom as round in the finest sense, like a magic circle cast by the best of the Spirit, gentle, true, deceptively radical, quietly if slowly revolutionary, and only just a little repetitious. (Consider the list of 274 of his publications we got in the conference materials—274! I certainly have not read all 274, but even within the ones I have, there is stuff I've seen more than once). Even that repetition becomes the mark of fidelity, however. For Tom is unwilling to leave even the anachronism, the gentleman lawyer, out of the circle into which he has invited a persistently motley crew of clients and friends and students and invisible rabbits (ask him about Elwood Dowd sometime).

Type
Commentary on the Work of Thomas L. Shaffer
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. 31 St Louis U Law J 73, 80 (1986)Google Scholar.

2. 3 J Law & Relig 193 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. McThenia, Andrew W. Jr., ed, Radical Christian and Exemplary Lawyer: A Festschrift Honoring William Stringfellow (Eerdmans, forthcoming 1995)Google Scholar.